Cargando…

Perspectives and limits of cancer treatment in an oldest old population

BACKGROUND: Population of oldest old will grow dramatically in the next future and cancer, physiologically related to aging, will be very prevalent among them. Lack of evidence is a huge problem to manage cancer in oldest old and will be more and more in the next years. AIMS: Our purpose was to inve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Di Capua, Beatrice, Bellieni, Andrea, Fusco, Domenico, Gambacorta, Maria Antonietta, Tagliaferri, Luca, Villani, Emanuele Rocco, Bernabei, Roberto, Valentini, Vincenzo, Colloca, Giuseppe Ferdinando
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8531055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33704699
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40520-021-01821-2
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Population of oldest old will grow dramatically in the next future and cancer, physiologically related to aging, will be very prevalent among them. Lack of evidence is a huge problem to manage cancer in oldest old and will be more and more in the next years. AIMS: Our purpose was to investigate the characteristics of a population of oldest old patients with cancer treated in the Radiation Oncology Unit of Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study. The primary outcome was to evaluate which characteristics of the population could influence the choice of oncological treatment (with radical or non-radical intent). RESULTS: We identified a total of 348 patients: 140 were on follow-up; 177 were under treatment; 31 were considered not eligible for treatments. Patients under treatment had a high comorbidity index (mean Charlson Comorbidity Index 5.4), and a high prevalence of polypharmacy (mean number of drugs 5.6). More than half (53.1%) was treated with radical intent. Patients treated with radical intent were 1 year younger (87.1 years old vs 88.1 years old), more performant (ECOG 0.7 vs 1.3), and had less prevalence of metastatic neoplasia (6.4% vs 34.9%); comorbidities and drugs did not show differences in the two groups. CONCLUSION: Oldest old, usually not considered in international guidelines, are treated for oncological disease, often with radical intent. The treatment seems not to be tailored considering comorbidities but on performance status.