Cargando…
Whole-body Computed Tomography Versus Dual Energy X‑ray Absorptiometry for Assessing Heterotopic Ossification in Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva
Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) is an ultra-rare genetic disorder that leads to heterotopic ossification (HO), resulting in progressive restriction of physical function. In this study, low-dose, whole-body computed tomography (WBCT) and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) were evaluat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8531122/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34331548 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00223-021-00877-6 |
_version_ | 1784586788650614784 |
---|---|
author | Warner, Sarah E. Kaplan, Frederick S. Pignolo, Robert J. Smith, Stacy E. Hsiao, Edward C. De Cunto, Carmen Di Rocco, Maja Harnett, Kathleen Grogan, Donna Genant, Harry K. |
author_facet | Warner, Sarah E. Kaplan, Frederick S. Pignolo, Robert J. Smith, Stacy E. Hsiao, Edward C. De Cunto, Carmen Di Rocco, Maja Harnett, Kathleen Grogan, Donna Genant, Harry K. |
author_sort | Warner, Sarah E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) is an ultra-rare genetic disorder that leads to heterotopic ossification (HO), resulting in progressive restriction of physical function. In this study, low-dose, whole-body computed tomography (WBCT) and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) were evaluated to determine the preferred method for assessing total body burden of HO in patients with FOP. This was a non-interventional, two-part natural history study in patients with FOP (NCT02322255; date of registration: December 2014). In Part A (described here), WBCT and DXA scans were individually assessed for HO presence and severity across 15 anatomical regions. All images were independently reviewed by an expert imaging panel. Ten adult patients were enrolled across four sites. The sensitivity to HO presence and severity varied considerably between the two imaging modalities, with WBCT demonstrating HO in more body regions than DXA (76/138 [55%] versus 47/113 [42%]) evaluable regions). Inability to evaluate HO presence, due to overlapping body regions (positional ambiguity), occurred less frequently by WBCT than by DXA (mean number of non-evaluable regions per scan 1.2 [standard deviation: 1.5] versus 2.4 [1.4]). Based on the increased sensitivity and decreased positional ambiguity of low-dose WBCT versus DXA in measuring HO in patients with FOP, low-dose WBCT was chosen as the preferred imaging for measuring HO. Therefore, low-dose WBCT was carried forward to Part B of the natural history study, which evaluated disease progression over 36 months in a larger population of patients with FOP. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8531122 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85311222021-11-04 Whole-body Computed Tomography Versus Dual Energy X‑ray Absorptiometry for Assessing Heterotopic Ossification in Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva Warner, Sarah E. Kaplan, Frederick S. Pignolo, Robert J. Smith, Stacy E. Hsiao, Edward C. De Cunto, Carmen Di Rocco, Maja Harnett, Kathleen Grogan, Donna Genant, Harry K. Calcif Tissue Int Original Research Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) is an ultra-rare genetic disorder that leads to heterotopic ossification (HO), resulting in progressive restriction of physical function. In this study, low-dose, whole-body computed tomography (WBCT) and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) were evaluated to determine the preferred method for assessing total body burden of HO in patients with FOP. This was a non-interventional, two-part natural history study in patients with FOP (NCT02322255; date of registration: December 2014). In Part A (described here), WBCT and DXA scans were individually assessed for HO presence and severity across 15 anatomical regions. All images were independently reviewed by an expert imaging panel. Ten adult patients were enrolled across four sites. The sensitivity to HO presence and severity varied considerably between the two imaging modalities, with WBCT demonstrating HO in more body regions than DXA (76/138 [55%] versus 47/113 [42%]) evaluable regions). Inability to evaluate HO presence, due to overlapping body regions (positional ambiguity), occurred less frequently by WBCT than by DXA (mean number of non-evaluable regions per scan 1.2 [standard deviation: 1.5] versus 2.4 [1.4]). Based on the increased sensitivity and decreased positional ambiguity of low-dose WBCT versus DXA in measuring HO in patients with FOP, low-dose WBCT was chosen as the preferred imaging for measuring HO. Therefore, low-dose WBCT was carried forward to Part B of the natural history study, which evaluated disease progression over 36 months in a larger population of patients with FOP. Springer US 2021-07-31 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8531122/ /pubmed/34331548 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00223-021-00877-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Warner, Sarah E. Kaplan, Frederick S. Pignolo, Robert J. Smith, Stacy E. Hsiao, Edward C. De Cunto, Carmen Di Rocco, Maja Harnett, Kathleen Grogan, Donna Genant, Harry K. Whole-body Computed Tomography Versus Dual Energy X‑ray Absorptiometry for Assessing Heterotopic Ossification in Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva |
title | Whole-body Computed Tomography Versus Dual Energy X‑ray Absorptiometry for Assessing Heterotopic Ossification in Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva |
title_full | Whole-body Computed Tomography Versus Dual Energy X‑ray Absorptiometry for Assessing Heterotopic Ossification in Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva |
title_fullStr | Whole-body Computed Tomography Versus Dual Energy X‑ray Absorptiometry for Assessing Heterotopic Ossification in Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva |
title_full_unstemmed | Whole-body Computed Tomography Versus Dual Energy X‑ray Absorptiometry for Assessing Heterotopic Ossification in Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva |
title_short | Whole-body Computed Tomography Versus Dual Energy X‑ray Absorptiometry for Assessing Heterotopic Ossification in Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva |
title_sort | whole-body computed tomography versus dual energy x‑ray absorptiometry for assessing heterotopic ossification in fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8531122/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34331548 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00223-021-00877-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT warnersarahe wholebodycomputedtomographyversusdualenergyxrayabsorptiometryforassessingheterotopicossificationinfibrodysplasiaossificansprogressiva AT kaplanfredericks wholebodycomputedtomographyversusdualenergyxrayabsorptiometryforassessingheterotopicossificationinfibrodysplasiaossificansprogressiva AT pignolorobertj wholebodycomputedtomographyversusdualenergyxrayabsorptiometryforassessingheterotopicossificationinfibrodysplasiaossificansprogressiva AT smithstacye wholebodycomputedtomographyversusdualenergyxrayabsorptiometryforassessingheterotopicossificationinfibrodysplasiaossificansprogressiva AT hsiaoedwardc wholebodycomputedtomographyversusdualenergyxrayabsorptiometryforassessingheterotopicossificationinfibrodysplasiaossificansprogressiva AT decuntocarmen wholebodycomputedtomographyversusdualenergyxrayabsorptiometryforassessingheterotopicossificationinfibrodysplasiaossificansprogressiva AT diroccomaja wholebodycomputedtomographyversusdualenergyxrayabsorptiometryforassessingheterotopicossificationinfibrodysplasiaossificansprogressiva AT harnettkathleen wholebodycomputedtomographyversusdualenergyxrayabsorptiometryforassessingheterotopicossificationinfibrodysplasiaossificansprogressiva AT grogandonna wholebodycomputedtomographyversusdualenergyxrayabsorptiometryforassessingheterotopicossificationinfibrodysplasiaossificansprogressiva AT genantharryk wholebodycomputedtomographyversusdualenergyxrayabsorptiometryforassessingheterotopicossificationinfibrodysplasiaossificansprogressiva |