Cargando…

Magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of indeterminate breast (BIRADS 3 & 4A) in a general population

OBJECTIVE: Currently, mammography and ultrasonography are the most used imaging techniques for breast cancer screening. However, these examinations report many indeterminate studies with a low probability of being malignant, i.e., BIRADS 3 and 4A. This prospective study aims to evaluate the value of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hernández, Liliana, Díaz, Gloria M., Posada, Catalina, Llano-Sierra, Alejandro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8531154/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34674056
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-021-01098-z
_version_ 1784586793175220224
author Hernández, Liliana
Díaz, Gloria M.
Posada, Catalina
Llano-Sierra, Alejandro
author_facet Hernández, Liliana
Díaz, Gloria M.
Posada, Catalina
Llano-Sierra, Alejandro
author_sort Hernández, Liliana
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Currently, mammography and ultrasonography are the most used imaging techniques for breast cancer screening. However, these examinations report many indeterminate studies with a low probability of being malignant, i.e., BIRADS 3 and 4A. This prospective study aims to evaluate the value of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to clarify the BIRADS categorization of indeterminate mammography or ultrasonography studies. METHODS: MRI studies acquired prospectively from 105 patients previously classified as BIRADS 3 or 4A were analyzed independently by four radiologists with different experience levels. Interobserver agreement was determined by the first-order agreement coefficient (AC1), and divergent results were re-analyzed for consensus. The possible correlation between the MRI and the mammography/ultrasound findings was evaluated, and each study was independently classified in one of the five BIRADS categories (BIRADS 1 to 5). In lesions categorized as BIRADS 4 or 5 at MRI, histopathological diagnosis was established by image-guided biopsy; while short-term follow-up was performed in lesions rated as BIRADS 3. RESULTS: Breast MRI was useful in diagnosing three invasive ductal carcinomas, upgraded from BIRADS 4A to BIRADS 5. It also allowed excluding malignancy in 86 patients (81.9%), avoiding 22 unnecessary biopsies and 64 short-term follow-ups. The MRI showed good diagnostic performance with the area under roc curve, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 0.995, 100%, 83.5%, 10.5%, and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: MRI showed to be useful as a problem-solving tool to clarify indeterminate findings in breast cancer screening and avoiding unnecessary short-follow-ups and percutaneous biopsies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8531154
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85311542021-11-04 Magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of indeterminate breast (BIRADS 3 & 4A) in a general population Hernández, Liliana Díaz, Gloria M. Posada, Catalina Llano-Sierra, Alejandro Insights Imaging Original Article OBJECTIVE: Currently, mammography and ultrasonography are the most used imaging techniques for breast cancer screening. However, these examinations report many indeterminate studies with a low probability of being malignant, i.e., BIRADS 3 and 4A. This prospective study aims to evaluate the value of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to clarify the BIRADS categorization of indeterminate mammography or ultrasonography studies. METHODS: MRI studies acquired prospectively from 105 patients previously classified as BIRADS 3 or 4A were analyzed independently by four radiologists with different experience levels. Interobserver agreement was determined by the first-order agreement coefficient (AC1), and divergent results were re-analyzed for consensus. The possible correlation between the MRI and the mammography/ultrasound findings was evaluated, and each study was independently classified in one of the five BIRADS categories (BIRADS 1 to 5). In lesions categorized as BIRADS 4 or 5 at MRI, histopathological diagnosis was established by image-guided biopsy; while short-term follow-up was performed in lesions rated as BIRADS 3. RESULTS: Breast MRI was useful in diagnosing three invasive ductal carcinomas, upgraded from BIRADS 4A to BIRADS 5. It also allowed excluding malignancy in 86 patients (81.9%), avoiding 22 unnecessary biopsies and 64 short-term follow-ups. The MRI showed good diagnostic performance with the area under roc curve, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 0.995, 100%, 83.5%, 10.5%, and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: MRI showed to be useful as a problem-solving tool to clarify indeterminate findings in breast cancer screening and avoiding unnecessary short-follow-ups and percutaneous biopsies. Springer International Publishing 2021-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8531154/ /pubmed/34674056 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-021-01098-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Hernández, Liliana
Díaz, Gloria M.
Posada, Catalina
Llano-Sierra, Alejandro
Magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of indeterminate breast (BIRADS 3 & 4A) in a general population
title Magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of indeterminate breast (BIRADS 3 & 4A) in a general population
title_full Magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of indeterminate breast (BIRADS 3 & 4A) in a general population
title_fullStr Magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of indeterminate breast (BIRADS 3 & 4A) in a general population
title_full_unstemmed Magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of indeterminate breast (BIRADS 3 & 4A) in a general population
title_short Magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of indeterminate breast (BIRADS 3 & 4A) in a general population
title_sort magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of indeterminate breast (birads 3 & 4a) in a general population
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8531154/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34674056
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-021-01098-z
work_keys_str_mv AT hernandezliliana magneticresonanceimagingindiagnosisofindeterminatebreastbirads34ainageneralpopulation
AT diazgloriam magneticresonanceimagingindiagnosisofindeterminatebreastbirads34ainageneralpopulation
AT posadacatalina magneticresonanceimagingindiagnosisofindeterminatebreastbirads34ainageneralpopulation
AT llanosierraalejandro magneticresonanceimagingindiagnosisofindeterminatebreastbirads34ainageneralpopulation