Cargando…

Body Habitus Considerations During Right Heart Catheterization

BACKGROUND: Obese and overweight body habitus are common among patients undergoing right heart catheterization for suspected pulmonary hypertension, but previous studies have described only patients with severe obesity. This study examined the effect of body habitus on intracardiac pressures, thermo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Girdharry, Natasha R., Bentley, Robert F., Valle, Felipe H., Karvasarski, Elizabeth, Osman, Sinan, Gurtu, Vikram, Kolker, Shimon, Mak, Susanna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8531193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34712937
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjco.2021.04.015
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Obese and overweight body habitus are common among patients undergoing right heart catheterization for suspected pulmonary hypertension, but previous studies have described only patients with severe obesity. This study examined the effect of body habitus on intracardiac pressures, thermodilution cardiac output (TDCO), indirect Fick (iFick) cardiac output (CO), and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) in subjects with normal cardiopulmonary hemodynamics. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on healthy volunteers and patients referred for right heart catheterization for dyspnea of unknown origin with normal hemodynamics. Of the 65 subjects (53 ± 14 years; 51% female), 31% were normal weight, 49% were overweight, and 20% had obesity, as defined by a body mass index of 30-39.9 kg/m(2). Mixed venous oxygen saturations and intracardiac pressures were compared across body mass index categories. Agreement between iFick CO calculated by 3 formulae, and TDCO and PVR was examined. RESULTS: No differences in intracardiac pressures were observed, but mixed venous oxygen saturations were lower in the obese group. iFick CO underestimated TDCO, particularly with the LaFarge formula, with a systematic difference of 0.33 L/min for every 1 L/min increase in CO. This difference was largest in the obese group—on average by 23% ± 10%, translating to an overestimation of PVR by 34% ± 16% on average. CONCLUSIONS: In individuals without severe obesity, intracardiac pressures are not different, but mixed venous oxygen saturations are lower. Obesity confounds estimations of CO and PVR by iFick methods, which could result in inappropriate hemodynamic classification. These data can inform best practices in hemodynamic assessment of populations with obesity.