Cargando…

Reappraisal—but not Suppression—Tendencies Determine Negativity Bias After Laboratory and Real-World Stress Exposure

Higher reactivity to stress exposure is associated with an increased tendency to appraise ambiguous stimuli as negative. However, it remains unknown whether tendencies to use emotion regulation strategies—such as cognitive reappraisal, which involves altering the meaning or relevance of affective st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Raio, Candace M., Harp, Nicholas R., Brown, Catherine C., Neta, Maital
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8531907/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34704072
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42761-021-00059-5
_version_ 1784586964021805056
author Raio, Candace M.
Harp, Nicholas R.
Brown, Catherine C.
Neta, Maital
author_facet Raio, Candace M.
Harp, Nicholas R.
Brown, Catherine C.
Neta, Maital
author_sort Raio, Candace M.
collection PubMed
description Higher reactivity to stress exposure is associated with an increased tendency to appraise ambiguous stimuli as negative. However, it remains unknown whether tendencies to use emotion regulation strategies—such as cognitive reappraisal, which involves altering the meaning or relevance of affective stimuli—can shape individual differences regarding how stress affects perceptions of ambiguity. Here, we examined whether increased reappraisal use is one factor that can determine whether stress exposure induces increased negativity bias. In Study 1, healthy participants (n = 43) rated the valence of emotionally ambiguous (surprised) faces before and after an acute stress or control manipulation and reported reappraisal habits. Increased negativity ratings were milder for stressed individuals that reported more habitual reappraisal use. In Study 2 (n = 97), we extended this investigation to real-world perceived stress before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. We found that reappraisal tendency moderates the relationship between perceived stress and increased negativity bias. Collectively, these findings suggest that the propensity to reappraise determines negativity bias when evaluating ambiguity under stress. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s42761-021-00059-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8531907
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85319072021-10-22 Reappraisal—but not Suppression—Tendencies Determine Negativity Bias After Laboratory and Real-World Stress Exposure Raio, Candace M. Harp, Nicholas R. Brown, Catherine C. Neta, Maital Affect Sci Research Article Higher reactivity to stress exposure is associated with an increased tendency to appraise ambiguous stimuli as negative. However, it remains unknown whether tendencies to use emotion regulation strategies—such as cognitive reappraisal, which involves altering the meaning or relevance of affective stimuli—can shape individual differences regarding how stress affects perceptions of ambiguity. Here, we examined whether increased reappraisal use is one factor that can determine whether stress exposure induces increased negativity bias. In Study 1, healthy participants (n = 43) rated the valence of emotionally ambiguous (surprised) faces before and after an acute stress or control manipulation and reported reappraisal habits. Increased negativity ratings were milder for stressed individuals that reported more habitual reappraisal use. In Study 2 (n = 97), we extended this investigation to real-world perceived stress before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. We found that reappraisal tendency moderates the relationship between perceived stress and increased negativity bias. Collectively, these findings suggest that the propensity to reappraise determines negativity bias when evaluating ambiguity under stress. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s42761-021-00059-5. Springer International Publishing 2021-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8531907/ /pubmed/34704072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42761-021-00059-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Article
Raio, Candace M.
Harp, Nicholas R.
Brown, Catherine C.
Neta, Maital
Reappraisal—but not Suppression—Tendencies Determine Negativity Bias After Laboratory and Real-World Stress Exposure
title Reappraisal—but not Suppression—Tendencies Determine Negativity Bias After Laboratory and Real-World Stress Exposure
title_full Reappraisal—but not Suppression—Tendencies Determine Negativity Bias After Laboratory and Real-World Stress Exposure
title_fullStr Reappraisal—but not Suppression—Tendencies Determine Negativity Bias After Laboratory and Real-World Stress Exposure
title_full_unstemmed Reappraisal—but not Suppression—Tendencies Determine Negativity Bias After Laboratory and Real-World Stress Exposure
title_short Reappraisal—but not Suppression—Tendencies Determine Negativity Bias After Laboratory and Real-World Stress Exposure
title_sort reappraisal—but not suppression—tendencies determine negativity bias after laboratory and real-world stress exposure
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8531907/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34704072
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42761-021-00059-5
work_keys_str_mv AT raiocandacem reappraisalbutnotsuppressiontendenciesdeterminenegativitybiasafterlaboratoryandrealworldstressexposure
AT harpnicholasr reappraisalbutnotsuppressiontendenciesdeterminenegativitybiasafterlaboratoryandrealworldstressexposure
AT browncatherinec reappraisalbutnotsuppressiontendenciesdeterminenegativitybiasafterlaboratoryandrealworldstressexposure
AT netamaital reappraisalbutnotsuppressiontendenciesdeterminenegativitybiasafterlaboratoryandrealworldstressexposure