Volume Elastic Modulus, Vascular Function, and Vascular Structure in Patients with Cardiovascular Risk Factors

Aims: Volume elastic modulus (V (E) ), an index of arterial elasticity, and arterial diameter of the brachial artery can be automatically measured by a newly developed oscillometric device. We investigated the associations of V (E) with flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD), an index of endothelium-depen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maruhashi, Tatsuya, Kajikawa, Masato, Kishimoto, Shinji, Takaeko, Yuji, Yamaji, Takayuki, Harada, Takahiro, Hashimoto, Yu, Han, Yiming, Aibara, Yoshiki, Mohamad Yusoff, Farina, Chayama, Kazuaki, Nakashima, Ayumu, Goto, Chikara, Nakano, Yukiko, Higashi, Yukihito
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Japan Atherosclerosis Society 2021
Materias:
Original Article
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8532062/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33100278
http://dx.doi.org/10.5551/jat.59261
Descripción
Sumario:Aims: Volume elastic modulus (V (E) ), an index of arterial elasticity, and arterial diameter of the brachial artery can be automatically measured by a newly developed oscillometric device. We investigated the associations of V (E) with flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD), an index of endothelium-dependent vasodilation, nitroglycerine-induced vasodilation (NID), an index of endothelium-independent vasodilation, and intima-media thickness (IMT) of the brachial artery and association of oscillometrically measured brachial artery diameter with ultrasonographically measured brachial artery diameter in patients with cardiovascular risk factors. Methods: Oscillometric measurements of V (E) and brachial artery diameter and ultrasound measurements of brachial artery diameter, FMD, NID, and IMT of the brachial artery were performed in 50 patients with cardiovascular risk factors. Results: The mean values were 2.1±0.4 mmHg/% for V (E) , 0.31±0.05 mm for brachial IMT, 4.48±0.70 mm for oscillometric brachial artery diameter, and 4.30±0.55 mm for ultrasound brachial artery diameter. V (E) significantly correlated with brachial IMT (r=0.51, P ＜0.001), whereas there was no significant correlation of V (E) with FMD (r=-0.08, P =0.58) or NID (r=0.07, P =0.61). Multivariate analysis revealed that V (E) was significantly associated with brachial IMT (β=0.33, P =0.04). Oscillometric brachial artery diameter significantly correlated with ultrasound brachial artery diameter (r=0.79, P ＜0.001). The Bland-Altman plot showed good agreement between oscillometric brachial artery diameter and ultrasound brachial artery diameter (mean difference, -0.17 mm; limits of agreement, -1.03 mm to 0.69 mm). Conclusions: In patients with cardiovascular risk factors, V (E) may represent atherosclerotic structural alterations of the vascular wall but not vascular function. The accuracy of oscillometric measurement of brachial artery diameter is acceptable.

Ejemplares similares