Cargando…

Tools for Assessment of Country Preparedness for Public Health Emergencies: A Critical Review

Recent international communicable disease crises have highlighted the need for countries to assure their preparedness to respond effectively to public health emergencies. The objective of this study was to critically review existing tools to support a country’s assessment of its health emergency pre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haeberer, Mariana, Tsolova, Svetla, Riley, Paul, Cano-Portero, Rosa, Rexroth, Ute, Ciotti, Massimo, Fraser, Graham
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8532124/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32366350
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2020.13
_version_ 1784587007475843072
author Haeberer, Mariana
Tsolova, Svetla
Riley, Paul
Cano-Portero, Rosa
Rexroth, Ute
Ciotti, Massimo
Fraser, Graham
author_facet Haeberer, Mariana
Tsolova, Svetla
Riley, Paul
Cano-Portero, Rosa
Rexroth, Ute
Ciotti, Massimo
Fraser, Graham
author_sort Haeberer, Mariana
collection PubMed
description Recent international communicable disease crises have highlighted the need for countries to assure their preparedness to respond effectively to public health emergencies. The objective of this study was to critically review existing tools to support a country’s assessment of its health emergency preparedness. We developed a framework to analyze the expected effectiveness and utility of these tools. Through mixed search strategies, we identified 12 tools with relevance to public health emergencies. There was considerable consensus concerning the critical preparedness system elements to be assessed, although their relative emphasis and means of assessment and measurement varied considerably. Several tools identified appeared to have reporting requirements as their primary aim, rather than primary utility for system self-assessment of the countries and states using the tool. Few tools attempted to give an account of their underlying evidence base. Only some tools were available in a user-friendly electronic modality or included quantitative measures to support the monitoring of system preparedness over time. We conclude there is still a need for improvement in tools available for assessment of country preparedness for public health emergencies, and for applied research to increase identification of system measures that are valid indicators of system response capability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8532124
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85321242021-11-02 Tools for Assessment of Country Preparedness for Public Health Emergencies: A Critical Review Haeberer, Mariana Tsolova, Svetla Riley, Paul Cano-Portero, Rosa Rexroth, Ute Ciotti, Massimo Fraser, Graham Disaster Med Public Health Prep Original Research Recent international communicable disease crises have highlighted the need for countries to assure their preparedness to respond effectively to public health emergencies. The objective of this study was to critically review existing tools to support a country’s assessment of its health emergency preparedness. We developed a framework to analyze the expected effectiveness and utility of these tools. Through mixed search strategies, we identified 12 tools with relevance to public health emergencies. There was considerable consensus concerning the critical preparedness system elements to be assessed, although their relative emphasis and means of assessment and measurement varied considerably. Several tools identified appeared to have reporting requirements as their primary aim, rather than primary utility for system self-assessment of the countries and states using the tool. Few tools attempted to give an account of their underlying evidence base. Only some tools were available in a user-friendly electronic modality or included quantitative measures to support the monitoring of system preparedness over time. We conclude there is still a need for improvement in tools available for assessment of country preparedness for public health emergencies, and for applied research to increase identification of system measures that are valid indicators of system response capability. Cambridge University Press 2021-08 2020-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8532124/ /pubmed/32366350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2020.13 Text en © Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Haeberer, Mariana
Tsolova, Svetla
Riley, Paul
Cano-Portero, Rosa
Rexroth, Ute
Ciotti, Massimo
Fraser, Graham
Tools for Assessment of Country Preparedness for Public Health Emergencies: A Critical Review
title Tools for Assessment of Country Preparedness for Public Health Emergencies: A Critical Review
title_full Tools for Assessment of Country Preparedness for Public Health Emergencies: A Critical Review
title_fullStr Tools for Assessment of Country Preparedness for Public Health Emergencies: A Critical Review
title_full_unstemmed Tools for Assessment of Country Preparedness for Public Health Emergencies: A Critical Review
title_short Tools for Assessment of Country Preparedness for Public Health Emergencies: A Critical Review
title_sort tools for assessment of country preparedness for public health emergencies: a critical review
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8532124/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32366350
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2020.13
work_keys_str_mv AT haeberermariana toolsforassessmentofcountrypreparednessforpublichealthemergenciesacriticalreview
AT tsolovasvetla toolsforassessmentofcountrypreparednessforpublichealthemergenciesacriticalreview
AT rileypaul toolsforassessmentofcountrypreparednessforpublichealthemergenciesacriticalreview
AT canoporterorosa toolsforassessmentofcountrypreparednessforpublichealthemergenciesacriticalreview
AT rexrothute toolsforassessmentofcountrypreparednessforpublichealthemergenciesacriticalreview
AT ciottimassimo toolsforassessmentofcountrypreparednessforpublichealthemergenciesacriticalreview
AT frasergraham toolsforassessmentofcountrypreparednessforpublichealthemergenciesacriticalreview