Cargando…
Tools for Assessment of Country Preparedness for Public Health Emergencies: A Critical Review
Recent international communicable disease crises have highlighted the need for countries to assure their preparedness to respond effectively to public health emergencies. The objective of this study was to critically review existing tools to support a country’s assessment of its health emergency pre...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8532124/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32366350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2020.13 |
_version_ | 1784587007475843072 |
---|---|
author | Haeberer, Mariana Tsolova, Svetla Riley, Paul Cano-Portero, Rosa Rexroth, Ute Ciotti, Massimo Fraser, Graham |
author_facet | Haeberer, Mariana Tsolova, Svetla Riley, Paul Cano-Portero, Rosa Rexroth, Ute Ciotti, Massimo Fraser, Graham |
author_sort | Haeberer, Mariana |
collection | PubMed |
description | Recent international communicable disease crises have highlighted the need for countries to assure their preparedness to respond effectively to public health emergencies. The objective of this study was to critically review existing tools to support a country’s assessment of its health emergency preparedness. We developed a framework to analyze the expected effectiveness and utility of these tools. Through mixed search strategies, we identified 12 tools with relevance to public health emergencies. There was considerable consensus concerning the critical preparedness system elements to be assessed, although their relative emphasis and means of assessment and measurement varied considerably. Several tools identified appeared to have reporting requirements as their primary aim, rather than primary utility for system self-assessment of the countries and states using the tool. Few tools attempted to give an account of their underlying evidence base. Only some tools were available in a user-friendly electronic modality or included quantitative measures to support the monitoring of system preparedness over time. We conclude there is still a need for improvement in tools available for assessment of country preparedness for public health emergencies, and for applied research to increase identification of system measures that are valid indicators of system response capability. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8532124 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85321242021-11-02 Tools for Assessment of Country Preparedness for Public Health Emergencies: A Critical Review Haeberer, Mariana Tsolova, Svetla Riley, Paul Cano-Portero, Rosa Rexroth, Ute Ciotti, Massimo Fraser, Graham Disaster Med Public Health Prep Original Research Recent international communicable disease crises have highlighted the need for countries to assure their preparedness to respond effectively to public health emergencies. The objective of this study was to critically review existing tools to support a country’s assessment of its health emergency preparedness. We developed a framework to analyze the expected effectiveness and utility of these tools. Through mixed search strategies, we identified 12 tools with relevance to public health emergencies. There was considerable consensus concerning the critical preparedness system elements to be assessed, although their relative emphasis and means of assessment and measurement varied considerably. Several tools identified appeared to have reporting requirements as their primary aim, rather than primary utility for system self-assessment of the countries and states using the tool. Few tools attempted to give an account of their underlying evidence base. Only some tools were available in a user-friendly electronic modality or included quantitative measures to support the monitoring of system preparedness over time. We conclude there is still a need for improvement in tools available for assessment of country preparedness for public health emergencies, and for applied research to increase identification of system measures that are valid indicators of system response capability. Cambridge University Press 2021-08 2020-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8532124/ /pubmed/32366350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2020.13 Text en © Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Haeberer, Mariana Tsolova, Svetla Riley, Paul Cano-Portero, Rosa Rexroth, Ute Ciotti, Massimo Fraser, Graham Tools for Assessment of Country Preparedness for Public Health Emergencies: A Critical Review |
title | Tools for Assessment of Country Preparedness for Public Health Emergencies: A Critical Review |
title_full | Tools for Assessment of Country Preparedness for Public Health Emergencies: A Critical Review |
title_fullStr | Tools for Assessment of Country Preparedness for Public Health Emergencies: A Critical Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Tools for Assessment of Country Preparedness for Public Health Emergencies: A Critical Review |
title_short | Tools for Assessment of Country Preparedness for Public Health Emergencies: A Critical Review |
title_sort | tools for assessment of country preparedness for public health emergencies: a critical review |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8532124/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32366350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2020.13 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT haeberermariana toolsforassessmentofcountrypreparednessforpublichealthemergenciesacriticalreview AT tsolovasvetla toolsforassessmentofcountrypreparednessforpublichealthemergenciesacriticalreview AT rileypaul toolsforassessmentofcountrypreparednessforpublichealthemergenciesacriticalreview AT canoporterorosa toolsforassessmentofcountrypreparednessforpublichealthemergenciesacriticalreview AT rexrothute toolsforassessmentofcountrypreparednessforpublichealthemergenciesacriticalreview AT ciottimassimo toolsforassessmentofcountrypreparednessforpublichealthemergenciesacriticalreview AT frasergraham toolsforassessmentofcountrypreparednessforpublichealthemergenciesacriticalreview |