Cargando…
A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Readability of Online Healthcare Materials Regarding Distal Radius Fractures
Introduction Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are among the most common upper limb fractures reviewed in the emergency and orthopaedic departments. Approximately 40% of these fractures are unstable and require fixation to improve limb function. Confronted with an impending operation, many patients wil...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8532190/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34707959 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.18188 |
_version_ | 1784587017886105600 |
---|---|
author | Mc Carthy, Andrea Bossut, Catherine |
author_facet | Mc Carthy, Andrea Bossut, Catherine |
author_sort | Mc Carthy, Andrea |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are among the most common upper limb fractures reviewed in the emergency and orthopaedic departments. Approximately 40% of these fractures are unstable and require fixation to improve limb function. Confronted with an impending operation, many patients will access the internet, looking for information and reassurance. Previous studies have suggested that orthopaedic healthcare websites are beyond the comprehension of their target audience. Objective To assess the readability of healthcare websites regarding DRFs. Methods The terms distal radius fracture, broken wrist and wrist fracture were searched on Google and Bing. Of 101 websites initially considered, 52 unique websites underwent evaluation using readability software. Websites were assessed using two common methods for assessing readabilty; the Reading Grade Level (RGL) and the Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES). In line with recommended guidelines and previous studies, an RGL of sixth grade and under and a FRES score above 65 was considered acceptable. Results The mean score for the FRES index was 56.67 (SD: ± 19.6), which resulted in the majority of pieces assessed being classified as ‘fairly difficult to read'. The mean RGL was 8.61 (SD: ± 2.86); 17.3% of the websites assessed fulfilled the criteria of having an RGL of six or less. One way T-tests comparing the FRES and RGL mean scores against the acceptable standards showed that they failed to meet the acceptable indexes (FRES: P<0.004; 95% CI: -13.8 to -2.8; RGL: P<0.0001; CI: 1.8-3.4). ANOVA testing showed no significant difference based on category (FRES: P=0.791; RGL: P=0.101). Conclusion The level of comprehension required for online healthcare education materials related to distal radius fractures exceeds the recommended guidelines. Improving the readability content of these websites would enhance the internet’s usability as an educational tool as well as improve patient post-operative outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8532190 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85321902021-10-26 A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Readability of Online Healthcare Materials Regarding Distal Radius Fractures Mc Carthy, Andrea Bossut, Catherine Cureus Medical Education Introduction Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are among the most common upper limb fractures reviewed in the emergency and orthopaedic departments. Approximately 40% of these fractures are unstable and require fixation to improve limb function. Confronted with an impending operation, many patients will access the internet, looking for information and reassurance. Previous studies have suggested that orthopaedic healthcare websites are beyond the comprehension of their target audience. Objective To assess the readability of healthcare websites regarding DRFs. Methods The terms distal radius fracture, broken wrist and wrist fracture were searched on Google and Bing. Of 101 websites initially considered, 52 unique websites underwent evaluation using readability software. Websites were assessed using two common methods for assessing readabilty; the Reading Grade Level (RGL) and the Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES). In line with recommended guidelines and previous studies, an RGL of sixth grade and under and a FRES score above 65 was considered acceptable. Results The mean score for the FRES index was 56.67 (SD: ± 19.6), which resulted in the majority of pieces assessed being classified as ‘fairly difficult to read'. The mean RGL was 8.61 (SD: ± 2.86); 17.3% of the websites assessed fulfilled the criteria of having an RGL of six or less. One way T-tests comparing the FRES and RGL mean scores against the acceptable standards showed that they failed to meet the acceptable indexes (FRES: P<0.004; 95% CI: -13.8 to -2.8; RGL: P<0.0001; CI: 1.8-3.4). ANOVA testing showed no significant difference based on category (FRES: P=0.791; RGL: P=0.101). Conclusion The level of comprehension required for online healthcare education materials related to distal radius fractures exceeds the recommended guidelines. Improving the readability content of these websites would enhance the internet’s usability as an educational tool as well as improve patient post-operative outcomes. Cureus 2021-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8532190/ /pubmed/34707959 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.18188 Text en Copyright © 2021, Mc Carthy et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Medical Education Mc Carthy, Andrea Bossut, Catherine A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Readability of Online Healthcare Materials Regarding Distal Radius Fractures |
title | A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Readability of Online Healthcare Materials Regarding Distal Radius Fractures |
title_full | A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Readability of Online Healthcare Materials Regarding Distal Radius Fractures |
title_fullStr | A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Readability of Online Healthcare Materials Regarding Distal Radius Fractures |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Readability of Online Healthcare Materials Regarding Distal Radius Fractures |
title_short | A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Readability of Online Healthcare Materials Regarding Distal Radius Fractures |
title_sort | comprehensive evaluation of the readability of online healthcare materials regarding distal radius fractures |
topic | Medical Education |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8532190/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34707959 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.18188 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mccarthyandrea acomprehensiveevaluationofthereadabilityofonlinehealthcarematerialsregardingdistalradiusfractures AT bossutcatherine acomprehensiveevaluationofthereadabilityofonlinehealthcarematerialsregardingdistalradiusfractures AT mccarthyandrea comprehensiveevaluationofthereadabilityofonlinehealthcarematerialsregardingdistalradiusfractures AT bossutcatherine comprehensiveevaluationofthereadabilityofonlinehealthcarematerialsregardingdistalradiusfractures |