Cargando…

A systematic scoping review of early interventions for parents of deaf infants

BACKGROUND: Over 90% of the 50,000 deaf children in the UK have hearing parents, many of whom were not expecting a deaf child and may require specialist support. Deaf children can experience poorer long-term outcomes than hearing children across a range of domains. After early detection by the Unive...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wright, B., Hargate, R., Garside, M., Carr, G., Wakefield, T., Swanwick, R., Noon, I., Simpson, P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8532316/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34686176
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-021-02893-9
_version_ 1784587042965946368
author Wright, B.
Hargate, R.
Garside, M.
Carr, G.
Wakefield, T.
Swanwick, R.
Noon, I.
Simpson, P.
author_facet Wright, B.
Hargate, R.
Garside, M.
Carr, G.
Wakefield, T.
Swanwick, R.
Noon, I.
Simpson, P.
author_sort Wright, B.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Over 90% of the 50,000 deaf children in the UK have hearing parents, many of whom were not expecting a deaf child and may require specialist support. Deaf children can experience poorer long-term outcomes than hearing children across a range of domains. After early detection by the Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Programme, parents in the UK receive support from Qualified Teachers of the Deaf and audiologists but resources are tight and intervention support can vary by locality. There are challenges faced due to a lack of clarity around what specific parenting support interventions are most helpful. METHODS: The aim of this research was to complete a systematic scoping review of the evidence to identify early support interventions for parents of deaf infants. From 5577 identified records, 54 met inclusion criteria. Two reviewers screened papers through three rounds before completing data extraction and quality assessment. RESULTS: Identified parent support interventions included both group and individual sessions in various settings (including online). They were led by a range of professionals and targeted various outcomes. Internationally there were only five randomised controlled trials. Other designs included non-randomised comparison groups, pre / post and other designs e.g. longitudinal, qualitative and case studies. Quality assessment showed few high quality studies with most having some concerns over risk of bias. CONCLUSION: Interventions commonly focused on infant language and communication followed by parental knowledge and skills; parent wellbeing and empowerment; and parent/child relationship. There were no interventions that focused specifically on parent support to understand or nurture child socio-emotional development despite this being a well-established area of poor outcome for deaf children. There were few UK studies and research generally was not of high quality. Many studies were not recent and so not in the context of recent healthcare advances. Further research in this area is urgently needed to help develop evidence based early interventions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12887-021-02893-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8532316
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85323162021-10-25 A systematic scoping review of early interventions for parents of deaf infants Wright, B. Hargate, R. Garside, M. Carr, G. Wakefield, T. Swanwick, R. Noon, I. Simpson, P. BMC Pediatr Research BACKGROUND: Over 90% of the 50,000 deaf children in the UK have hearing parents, many of whom were not expecting a deaf child and may require specialist support. Deaf children can experience poorer long-term outcomes than hearing children across a range of domains. After early detection by the Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Programme, parents in the UK receive support from Qualified Teachers of the Deaf and audiologists but resources are tight and intervention support can vary by locality. There are challenges faced due to a lack of clarity around what specific parenting support interventions are most helpful. METHODS: The aim of this research was to complete a systematic scoping review of the evidence to identify early support interventions for parents of deaf infants. From 5577 identified records, 54 met inclusion criteria. Two reviewers screened papers through three rounds before completing data extraction and quality assessment. RESULTS: Identified parent support interventions included both group and individual sessions in various settings (including online). They were led by a range of professionals and targeted various outcomes. Internationally there were only five randomised controlled trials. Other designs included non-randomised comparison groups, pre / post and other designs e.g. longitudinal, qualitative and case studies. Quality assessment showed few high quality studies with most having some concerns over risk of bias. CONCLUSION: Interventions commonly focused on infant language and communication followed by parental knowledge and skills; parent wellbeing and empowerment; and parent/child relationship. There were no interventions that focused specifically on parent support to understand or nurture child socio-emotional development despite this being a well-established area of poor outcome for deaf children. There were few UK studies and research generally was not of high quality. Many studies were not recent and so not in the context of recent healthcare advances. Further research in this area is urgently needed to help develop evidence based early interventions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12887-021-02893-9. BioMed Central 2021-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8532316/ /pubmed/34686176 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-021-02893-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Wright, B.
Hargate, R.
Garside, M.
Carr, G.
Wakefield, T.
Swanwick, R.
Noon, I.
Simpson, P.
A systematic scoping review of early interventions for parents of deaf infants
title A systematic scoping review of early interventions for parents of deaf infants
title_full A systematic scoping review of early interventions for parents of deaf infants
title_fullStr A systematic scoping review of early interventions for parents of deaf infants
title_full_unstemmed A systematic scoping review of early interventions for parents of deaf infants
title_short A systematic scoping review of early interventions for parents of deaf infants
title_sort systematic scoping review of early interventions for parents of deaf infants
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8532316/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34686176
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-021-02893-9
work_keys_str_mv AT wrightb asystematicscopingreviewofearlyinterventionsforparentsofdeafinfants
AT hargater asystematicscopingreviewofearlyinterventionsforparentsofdeafinfants
AT garsidem asystematicscopingreviewofearlyinterventionsforparentsofdeafinfants
AT carrg asystematicscopingreviewofearlyinterventionsforparentsofdeafinfants
AT wakefieldt asystematicscopingreviewofearlyinterventionsforparentsofdeafinfants
AT swanwickr asystematicscopingreviewofearlyinterventionsforparentsofdeafinfants
AT nooni asystematicscopingreviewofearlyinterventionsforparentsofdeafinfants
AT simpsonp asystematicscopingreviewofearlyinterventionsforparentsofdeafinfants
AT wrightb systematicscopingreviewofearlyinterventionsforparentsofdeafinfants
AT hargater systematicscopingreviewofearlyinterventionsforparentsofdeafinfants
AT garsidem systematicscopingreviewofearlyinterventionsforparentsofdeafinfants
AT carrg systematicscopingreviewofearlyinterventionsforparentsofdeafinfants
AT wakefieldt systematicscopingreviewofearlyinterventionsforparentsofdeafinfants
AT swanwickr systematicscopingreviewofearlyinterventionsforparentsofdeafinfants
AT nooni systematicscopingreviewofearlyinterventionsforparentsofdeafinfants
AT simpsonp systematicscopingreviewofearlyinterventionsforparentsofdeafinfants