Cargando…
A systematic scoping review of early interventions for parents of deaf infants
BACKGROUND: Over 90% of the 50,000 deaf children in the UK have hearing parents, many of whom were not expecting a deaf child and may require specialist support. Deaf children can experience poorer long-term outcomes than hearing children across a range of domains. After early detection by the Unive...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8532316/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34686176 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-021-02893-9 |
_version_ | 1784587042965946368 |
---|---|
author | Wright, B. Hargate, R. Garside, M. Carr, G. Wakefield, T. Swanwick, R. Noon, I. Simpson, P. |
author_facet | Wright, B. Hargate, R. Garside, M. Carr, G. Wakefield, T. Swanwick, R. Noon, I. Simpson, P. |
author_sort | Wright, B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Over 90% of the 50,000 deaf children in the UK have hearing parents, many of whom were not expecting a deaf child and may require specialist support. Deaf children can experience poorer long-term outcomes than hearing children across a range of domains. After early detection by the Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Programme, parents in the UK receive support from Qualified Teachers of the Deaf and audiologists but resources are tight and intervention support can vary by locality. There are challenges faced due to a lack of clarity around what specific parenting support interventions are most helpful. METHODS: The aim of this research was to complete a systematic scoping review of the evidence to identify early support interventions for parents of deaf infants. From 5577 identified records, 54 met inclusion criteria. Two reviewers screened papers through three rounds before completing data extraction and quality assessment. RESULTS: Identified parent support interventions included both group and individual sessions in various settings (including online). They were led by a range of professionals and targeted various outcomes. Internationally there were only five randomised controlled trials. Other designs included non-randomised comparison groups, pre / post and other designs e.g. longitudinal, qualitative and case studies. Quality assessment showed few high quality studies with most having some concerns over risk of bias. CONCLUSION: Interventions commonly focused on infant language and communication followed by parental knowledge and skills; parent wellbeing and empowerment; and parent/child relationship. There were no interventions that focused specifically on parent support to understand or nurture child socio-emotional development despite this being a well-established area of poor outcome for deaf children. There were few UK studies and research generally was not of high quality. Many studies were not recent and so not in the context of recent healthcare advances. Further research in this area is urgently needed to help develop evidence based early interventions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12887-021-02893-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8532316 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85323162021-10-25 A systematic scoping review of early interventions for parents of deaf infants Wright, B. Hargate, R. Garside, M. Carr, G. Wakefield, T. Swanwick, R. Noon, I. Simpson, P. BMC Pediatr Research BACKGROUND: Over 90% of the 50,000 deaf children in the UK have hearing parents, many of whom were not expecting a deaf child and may require specialist support. Deaf children can experience poorer long-term outcomes than hearing children across a range of domains. After early detection by the Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Programme, parents in the UK receive support from Qualified Teachers of the Deaf and audiologists but resources are tight and intervention support can vary by locality. There are challenges faced due to a lack of clarity around what specific parenting support interventions are most helpful. METHODS: The aim of this research was to complete a systematic scoping review of the evidence to identify early support interventions for parents of deaf infants. From 5577 identified records, 54 met inclusion criteria. Two reviewers screened papers through three rounds before completing data extraction and quality assessment. RESULTS: Identified parent support interventions included both group and individual sessions in various settings (including online). They were led by a range of professionals and targeted various outcomes. Internationally there were only five randomised controlled trials. Other designs included non-randomised comparison groups, pre / post and other designs e.g. longitudinal, qualitative and case studies. Quality assessment showed few high quality studies with most having some concerns over risk of bias. CONCLUSION: Interventions commonly focused on infant language and communication followed by parental knowledge and skills; parent wellbeing and empowerment; and parent/child relationship. There were no interventions that focused specifically on parent support to understand or nurture child socio-emotional development despite this being a well-established area of poor outcome for deaf children. There were few UK studies and research generally was not of high quality. Many studies were not recent and so not in the context of recent healthcare advances. Further research in this area is urgently needed to help develop evidence based early interventions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12887-021-02893-9. BioMed Central 2021-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8532316/ /pubmed/34686176 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-021-02893-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Wright, B. Hargate, R. Garside, M. Carr, G. Wakefield, T. Swanwick, R. Noon, I. Simpson, P. A systematic scoping review of early interventions for parents of deaf infants |
title | A systematic scoping review of early interventions for parents of deaf infants |
title_full | A systematic scoping review of early interventions for parents of deaf infants |
title_fullStr | A systematic scoping review of early interventions for parents of deaf infants |
title_full_unstemmed | A systematic scoping review of early interventions for parents of deaf infants |
title_short | A systematic scoping review of early interventions for parents of deaf infants |
title_sort | systematic scoping review of early interventions for parents of deaf infants |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8532316/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34686176 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-021-02893-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wrightb asystematicscopingreviewofearlyinterventionsforparentsofdeafinfants AT hargater asystematicscopingreviewofearlyinterventionsforparentsofdeafinfants AT garsidem asystematicscopingreviewofearlyinterventionsforparentsofdeafinfants AT carrg asystematicscopingreviewofearlyinterventionsforparentsofdeafinfants AT wakefieldt asystematicscopingreviewofearlyinterventionsforparentsofdeafinfants AT swanwickr asystematicscopingreviewofearlyinterventionsforparentsofdeafinfants AT nooni asystematicscopingreviewofearlyinterventionsforparentsofdeafinfants AT simpsonp asystematicscopingreviewofearlyinterventionsforparentsofdeafinfants AT wrightb systematicscopingreviewofearlyinterventionsforparentsofdeafinfants AT hargater systematicscopingreviewofearlyinterventionsforparentsofdeafinfants AT garsidem systematicscopingreviewofearlyinterventionsforparentsofdeafinfants AT carrg systematicscopingreviewofearlyinterventionsforparentsofdeafinfants AT wakefieldt systematicscopingreviewofearlyinterventionsforparentsofdeafinfants AT swanwickr systematicscopingreviewofearlyinterventionsforparentsofdeafinfants AT nooni systematicscopingreviewofearlyinterventionsforparentsofdeafinfants AT simpsonp systematicscopingreviewofearlyinterventionsforparentsofdeafinfants |