Cargando…

Biomechanical analysis of subcondylar fracture fixation using miniplates at different positions and of different lengths

BACKGROUND: Many types of titanium plates were used to treat subcondylar fracture clinically. However, the efficacy of fixation in different implant positions and lengths of the bone plate has not been thoroughly investigated. Therefore, the primary purpose of this study was to use finite element an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Chao-Min, Chan, Man-Yee, Hsu, Jui-Ting, Su, Kuo-Chih
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8532336/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34674692
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01905-5
_version_ 1784587046909640704
author Huang, Chao-Min
Chan, Man-Yee
Hsu, Jui-Ting
Su, Kuo-Chih
author_facet Huang, Chao-Min
Chan, Man-Yee
Hsu, Jui-Ting
Su, Kuo-Chih
author_sort Huang, Chao-Min
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Many types of titanium plates were used to treat subcondylar fracture clinically. However, the efficacy of fixation in different implant positions and lengths of the bone plate has not been thoroughly investigated. Therefore, the primary purpose of this study was to use finite element analysis (FEA) to analyze the biomechanical effects of subcondylar fracture fixation with miniplates at different positions and lengths so that clinicians were able to find a better strategy of fixation to improve the efficacy and outcome of treatment. METHODS: The CAD software was used to combine the mandible, miniplate, and screw to create seven different FEA computer models. These models with subcondylar fracture were fixed with miniplates at different positions and of different lengths. The right unilateral molar clench occlusal mode was applied. The observational indicators were the reaction force at the temporomandibular joint, von Mises stress of the mandibular bone, miniplate and screw, and the sliding distance on the oblique surface of the fracture site at the mandibular condyle. RESULTS: The results showed the efficacy of fixation was better when two miniplates were used comparing to only one miniplates. Moreover, using longer miniplates for fixation had better results than the short one. Furthermore, fixing miniplates at the posterior portion of subcondylar region would have a better fixation efficacy and less sliding distance (5.46–5.76 μm) than fixing at the anterolateral surface of subcondylar region (6.10–7.00 μm). CONCLUSION: Miniplate fixation, which was placed closer to the posterior margin, could effectively reduce the amount of sliding distance in the fracture site, thereby achieving greater stability. Furthermore, fixation efficiency was improved when an additional miniplate was placed at the anterior margin. Our study suggested that the placement of miniplates at the posterior surface and the additional plate could effectively improve stability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8532336
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85323362021-10-25 Biomechanical analysis of subcondylar fracture fixation using miniplates at different positions and of different lengths Huang, Chao-Min Chan, Man-Yee Hsu, Jui-Ting Su, Kuo-Chih BMC Oral Health Research BACKGROUND: Many types of titanium plates were used to treat subcondylar fracture clinically. However, the efficacy of fixation in different implant positions and lengths of the bone plate has not been thoroughly investigated. Therefore, the primary purpose of this study was to use finite element analysis (FEA) to analyze the biomechanical effects of subcondylar fracture fixation with miniplates at different positions and lengths so that clinicians were able to find a better strategy of fixation to improve the efficacy and outcome of treatment. METHODS: The CAD software was used to combine the mandible, miniplate, and screw to create seven different FEA computer models. These models with subcondylar fracture were fixed with miniplates at different positions and of different lengths. The right unilateral molar clench occlusal mode was applied. The observational indicators were the reaction force at the temporomandibular joint, von Mises stress of the mandibular bone, miniplate and screw, and the sliding distance on the oblique surface of the fracture site at the mandibular condyle. RESULTS: The results showed the efficacy of fixation was better when two miniplates were used comparing to only one miniplates. Moreover, using longer miniplates for fixation had better results than the short one. Furthermore, fixing miniplates at the posterior portion of subcondylar region would have a better fixation efficacy and less sliding distance (5.46–5.76 μm) than fixing at the anterolateral surface of subcondylar region (6.10–7.00 μm). CONCLUSION: Miniplate fixation, which was placed closer to the posterior margin, could effectively reduce the amount of sliding distance in the fracture site, thereby achieving greater stability. Furthermore, fixation efficiency was improved when an additional miniplate was placed at the anterior margin. Our study suggested that the placement of miniplates at the posterior surface and the additional plate could effectively improve stability. BioMed Central 2021-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8532336/ /pubmed/34674692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01905-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Huang, Chao-Min
Chan, Man-Yee
Hsu, Jui-Ting
Su, Kuo-Chih
Biomechanical analysis of subcondylar fracture fixation using miniplates at different positions and of different lengths
title Biomechanical analysis of subcondylar fracture fixation using miniplates at different positions and of different lengths
title_full Biomechanical analysis of subcondylar fracture fixation using miniplates at different positions and of different lengths
title_fullStr Biomechanical analysis of subcondylar fracture fixation using miniplates at different positions and of different lengths
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical analysis of subcondylar fracture fixation using miniplates at different positions and of different lengths
title_short Biomechanical analysis of subcondylar fracture fixation using miniplates at different positions and of different lengths
title_sort biomechanical analysis of subcondylar fracture fixation using miniplates at different positions and of different lengths
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8532336/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34674692
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01905-5
work_keys_str_mv AT huangchaomin biomechanicalanalysisofsubcondylarfracturefixationusingminiplatesatdifferentpositionsandofdifferentlengths
AT chanmanyee biomechanicalanalysisofsubcondylarfracturefixationusingminiplatesatdifferentpositionsandofdifferentlengths
AT hsujuiting biomechanicalanalysisofsubcondylarfracturefixationusingminiplatesatdifferentpositionsandofdifferentlengths
AT sukuochih biomechanicalanalysisofsubcondylarfracturefixationusingminiplatesatdifferentpositionsandofdifferentlengths