Cargando…

Effect of Light Regiment on Farrowing Performance and Behavior in Sows

SIMPLE SUMMARY: When sows approach birthing in most commercial farms, they are often exposed to continuous light to help farm workers monitor pig health and progress. Being in constant lighting may have a negative effect on sows as mammals often prefer a quiet environment with low stimulation during...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McLoda, Shelby, Anderson, Nichole C., Earing, Jennifer, Lugar, Drew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8532603/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34679879
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11102858
_version_ 1784587105864777728
author McLoda, Shelby
Anderson, Nichole C.
Earing, Jennifer
Lugar, Drew
author_facet McLoda, Shelby
Anderson, Nichole C.
Earing, Jennifer
Lugar, Drew
author_sort McLoda, Shelby
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: When sows approach birthing in most commercial farms, they are often exposed to continuous light to help farm workers monitor pig health and progress. Being in constant lighting may have a negative effect on sows as mammals often prefer a quiet environment with low stimulation during birthing. In our study, we placed 15 sows in a 12 h light/12 h dark environment, and 15 sows in 24 h light. Sows were watched for ease of farrowing (measured in total time farrowing, birthing interval, and behavior during farrowing). We also measured total piglets born alive and stillborn piglets. Overall, we observed that sows who received darkness gave birth earlier in gestation. Light availability had no effect on total piglets born alive, farrowing behavior, or total length of time giving birth. It was observed that there were more stillborn animals for the sows who received darkness. Overall, it is possible that light availability could have an impact on farrowing behavior and health; however, more factors should be considered in the environment. ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of light exposure on farrowing performance in sows. Thirty sows were moved to the farrowing unit at d 110 of gestation and assigned a treatment: 12 h light/12 h dark cycle (Dark) or 24 h light (Light). Treatments began upon entry into the farrowing unit. Video was recorded continuously from initiation of the treatments until completion of farrowing. Data collected included duration of farrowing, birthing interval, and behavior during farrowing. Additionally, the number of total born, liveborn, and stillborn piglets was recorded. Gestation length was different between treatments, with a shorter gestation in Dark treatment sows than Light treatment sows (116.4 vs. 117.1 ± 0.2 d, respectively; p = 0.027). The total duration of parturition and number of liveborn did not differ (p = 0.393). Number of stillborn piglets between treatments did differ (p = 0.018). Dark had more stillborns compared to Light treatment sows (1.5 vs. 0.7 ± 0.2 piglets, respectively). Neither the interval between piglets nor farrowing behavior differed between treatments (p > 0.100). The results from this experiment indicate that a sudden change in photoperiod has the potential to impact the gestation length of sows and number of stillborn pigs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8532603
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85326032021-10-23 Effect of Light Regiment on Farrowing Performance and Behavior in Sows McLoda, Shelby Anderson, Nichole C. Earing, Jennifer Lugar, Drew Animals (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: When sows approach birthing in most commercial farms, they are often exposed to continuous light to help farm workers monitor pig health and progress. Being in constant lighting may have a negative effect on sows as mammals often prefer a quiet environment with low stimulation during birthing. In our study, we placed 15 sows in a 12 h light/12 h dark environment, and 15 sows in 24 h light. Sows were watched for ease of farrowing (measured in total time farrowing, birthing interval, and behavior during farrowing). We also measured total piglets born alive and stillborn piglets. Overall, we observed that sows who received darkness gave birth earlier in gestation. Light availability had no effect on total piglets born alive, farrowing behavior, or total length of time giving birth. It was observed that there were more stillborn animals for the sows who received darkness. Overall, it is possible that light availability could have an impact on farrowing behavior and health; however, more factors should be considered in the environment. ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of light exposure on farrowing performance in sows. Thirty sows were moved to the farrowing unit at d 110 of gestation and assigned a treatment: 12 h light/12 h dark cycle (Dark) or 24 h light (Light). Treatments began upon entry into the farrowing unit. Video was recorded continuously from initiation of the treatments until completion of farrowing. Data collected included duration of farrowing, birthing interval, and behavior during farrowing. Additionally, the number of total born, liveborn, and stillborn piglets was recorded. Gestation length was different between treatments, with a shorter gestation in Dark treatment sows than Light treatment sows (116.4 vs. 117.1 ± 0.2 d, respectively; p = 0.027). The total duration of parturition and number of liveborn did not differ (p = 0.393). Number of stillborn piglets between treatments did differ (p = 0.018). Dark had more stillborns compared to Light treatment sows (1.5 vs. 0.7 ± 0.2 piglets, respectively). Neither the interval between piglets nor farrowing behavior differed between treatments (p > 0.100). The results from this experiment indicate that a sudden change in photoperiod has the potential to impact the gestation length of sows and number of stillborn pigs. MDPI 2021-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8532603/ /pubmed/34679879 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11102858 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
McLoda, Shelby
Anderson, Nichole C.
Earing, Jennifer
Lugar, Drew
Effect of Light Regiment on Farrowing Performance and Behavior in Sows
title Effect of Light Regiment on Farrowing Performance and Behavior in Sows
title_full Effect of Light Regiment on Farrowing Performance and Behavior in Sows
title_fullStr Effect of Light Regiment on Farrowing Performance and Behavior in Sows
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Light Regiment on Farrowing Performance and Behavior in Sows
title_short Effect of Light Regiment on Farrowing Performance and Behavior in Sows
title_sort effect of light regiment on farrowing performance and behavior in sows
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8532603/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34679879
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11102858
work_keys_str_mv AT mclodashelby effectoflightregimentonfarrowingperformanceandbehaviorinsows
AT andersonnicholec effectoflightregimentonfarrowingperformanceandbehaviorinsows
AT earingjennifer effectoflightregimentonfarrowingperformanceandbehaviorinsows
AT lugardrew effectoflightregimentonfarrowingperformanceandbehaviorinsows