Cargando…

Animal-Based Indicators for On-Farm Welfare Assessment in Sheep

SIMPLE SUMMARY: As we keep and use sheep, we need to be able to assess their welfare and deal with welfare problems as they arise. To assess welfare, a comprehensive protocol based on valid and feasible indicators is needed. The aim of this study was to review the scientific literature and identify...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zufferey, Romane, Minnig, Adrian, Thomann, Beat, Zwygart, Sibylle, Keil, Nina, Schüpbach, Gertraud, Miserez, Raymond, Zanolari, Patrik, Stucki, Dimitri
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8532706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34679992
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11102973
_version_ 1784587132410527744
author Zufferey, Romane
Minnig, Adrian
Thomann, Beat
Zwygart, Sibylle
Keil, Nina
Schüpbach, Gertraud
Miserez, Raymond
Zanolari, Patrik
Stucki, Dimitri
author_facet Zufferey, Romane
Minnig, Adrian
Thomann, Beat
Zwygart, Sibylle
Keil, Nina
Schüpbach, Gertraud
Miserez, Raymond
Zanolari, Patrik
Stucki, Dimitri
author_sort Zufferey, Romane
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: As we keep and use sheep, we need to be able to assess their welfare and deal with welfare problems as they arise. To assess welfare, a comprehensive protocol based on valid and feasible indicators is needed. The aim of this study was to review the scientific literature and identify protocols and indicators for assessing the welfare of sheep. We identified promising protocols, well-known and established indicators, such as lameness or body condition score, as well as novel indicators that still need to be evaluated to prove their validity, such as pruritic behaviour or resting time. This review provides a starting point for the development of valid and feasible on-farm protocols using animal-based indicators to assess sheep welfare. ABSTRACT: The value society assigns to animal welfare in agricultural productions is increasing, resulting in ever-enhancing methods to assess the well-being of farm animals. The aim of this study was to review the scientific literature to obtain an overview of the current knowledge on welfare assessments for sheep and to extract animal-based welfare indicators as well as welfare protocols with animal-based indicators. By title and abstract screening, we identified five protocols and 53 potential indicators from 55 references. Three out of the five protocols include animal-based as well as resource-based indicators. All of them were assessed as being practicable on-farm but lacking reliability. Some of the single indicators are endorsed by the literature and widely used in the field like assessment of behaviour, lameness or body condition score. Others (e.g., Faffa Malan Chart FAMACHA©, dag score or pain assessment) are regularly mentioned in the literature, but their reliability and usefulness are still subject of discussion. Several indicators, such as pruritic behaviour, eye condition, lying time or tooth loss are relatively new in the literature and still lack evidence for their validity and usefulness. This literature review serves as a starting point for the development of valid and practicable welfare protocols for sheep.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8532706
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85327062021-10-23 Animal-Based Indicators for On-Farm Welfare Assessment in Sheep Zufferey, Romane Minnig, Adrian Thomann, Beat Zwygart, Sibylle Keil, Nina Schüpbach, Gertraud Miserez, Raymond Zanolari, Patrik Stucki, Dimitri Animals (Basel) Review SIMPLE SUMMARY: As we keep and use sheep, we need to be able to assess their welfare and deal with welfare problems as they arise. To assess welfare, a comprehensive protocol based on valid and feasible indicators is needed. The aim of this study was to review the scientific literature and identify protocols and indicators for assessing the welfare of sheep. We identified promising protocols, well-known and established indicators, such as lameness or body condition score, as well as novel indicators that still need to be evaluated to prove their validity, such as pruritic behaviour or resting time. This review provides a starting point for the development of valid and feasible on-farm protocols using animal-based indicators to assess sheep welfare. ABSTRACT: The value society assigns to animal welfare in agricultural productions is increasing, resulting in ever-enhancing methods to assess the well-being of farm animals. The aim of this study was to review the scientific literature to obtain an overview of the current knowledge on welfare assessments for sheep and to extract animal-based welfare indicators as well as welfare protocols with animal-based indicators. By title and abstract screening, we identified five protocols and 53 potential indicators from 55 references. Three out of the five protocols include animal-based as well as resource-based indicators. All of them were assessed as being practicable on-farm but lacking reliability. Some of the single indicators are endorsed by the literature and widely used in the field like assessment of behaviour, lameness or body condition score. Others (e.g., Faffa Malan Chart FAMACHA©, dag score or pain assessment) are regularly mentioned in the literature, but their reliability and usefulness are still subject of discussion. Several indicators, such as pruritic behaviour, eye condition, lying time or tooth loss are relatively new in the literature and still lack evidence for their validity and usefulness. This literature review serves as a starting point for the development of valid and practicable welfare protocols for sheep. MDPI 2021-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8532706/ /pubmed/34679992 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11102973 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Zufferey, Romane
Minnig, Adrian
Thomann, Beat
Zwygart, Sibylle
Keil, Nina
Schüpbach, Gertraud
Miserez, Raymond
Zanolari, Patrik
Stucki, Dimitri
Animal-Based Indicators for On-Farm Welfare Assessment in Sheep
title Animal-Based Indicators for On-Farm Welfare Assessment in Sheep
title_full Animal-Based Indicators for On-Farm Welfare Assessment in Sheep
title_fullStr Animal-Based Indicators for On-Farm Welfare Assessment in Sheep
title_full_unstemmed Animal-Based Indicators for On-Farm Welfare Assessment in Sheep
title_short Animal-Based Indicators for On-Farm Welfare Assessment in Sheep
title_sort animal-based indicators for on-farm welfare assessment in sheep
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8532706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34679992
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11102973
work_keys_str_mv AT zuffereyromane animalbasedindicatorsforonfarmwelfareassessmentinsheep
AT minnigadrian animalbasedindicatorsforonfarmwelfareassessmentinsheep
AT thomannbeat animalbasedindicatorsforonfarmwelfareassessmentinsheep
AT zwygartsibylle animalbasedindicatorsforonfarmwelfareassessmentinsheep
AT keilnina animalbasedindicatorsforonfarmwelfareassessmentinsheep
AT schupbachgertraud animalbasedindicatorsforonfarmwelfareassessmentinsheep
AT miserezraymond animalbasedindicatorsforonfarmwelfareassessmentinsheep
AT zanolaripatrik animalbasedindicatorsforonfarmwelfareassessmentinsheep
AT stuckidimitri animalbasedindicatorsforonfarmwelfareassessmentinsheep