Cargando…

Impact of Feeding Syngenta Enogen(®) Feed Corn Compared to Control Corn in Different Diet Scenarios to Finishing Beef Cattle

SIMPLE SUMMARY: A pooled statistical analysis of seven experiments and 200 pen observations was performed to determine the impact of feeding Enogen(®) corn compared to conventional corn grain in beef cattle finishing diets. When the corn was compared as dry-rolled corn in diets with lower inclusion...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Volk, Stacia M., Wilson, Hannah C., Hanford, Kathryn J., MacDonald, James C., Erickson, Galen E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8532963/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34679961
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11102940
_version_ 1784587196808822784
author Volk, Stacia M.
Wilson, Hannah C.
Hanford, Kathryn J.
MacDonald, James C.
Erickson, Galen E.
author_facet Volk, Stacia M.
Wilson, Hannah C.
Hanford, Kathryn J.
MacDonald, James C.
Erickson, Galen E.
author_sort Volk, Stacia M.
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: A pooled statistical analysis of seven experiments and 200 pen observations was performed to determine the impact of feeding Enogen(®) corn compared to conventional corn grain in beef cattle finishing diets. When the corn was compared as dry-rolled corn in diets with lower inclusion rates of distiller grains plus solubles (less than 20% of the diet), feeding Enogen(®) corn improved the efficiency of beef production. That response was a 4.8% improvement due to feeding Enogen(®) in a corn-based diet without distiller grains but was 1.8% in diets with 18 to 20% distiller grains. Feeding Enogen(®) corn improved the efficiency by 4.5% in diets with another common byproduct, Sweet Bran(®). Cattle performance was similar for Enogen(®) and conventional hybrids when processed and fed as high-moisture corn. Feeding Enogen(®) corn improves the gain efficiency of finishing cattle compared with conventional corn when fed as dry-rolled corn in diets with less than 20% distillers or diets that include Sweet Bran(®) feeds. ABSTRACT: The objective of this pooled statistical analysis was to evaluate Syngenta Enogen(®) Feed Corn (EFC) versus conventional corn (CON) when fed as either dry-rolled corn (DRC) or high-moisture corn (HMC) for effects on finishing beef cattle performance and carcass characteristics. Corns were evaluated in diets with byproduct inclusion rates of 0, 15, 18, 20, and 30% distiller grains or 25 and 35% Sweet Bran(®) (a commercial corn gluten feed product). Seven trials (n = 1856) consisting of 200 pen means comparing 26 diet treatments were analyzed using regression in a pooled analysis. When EFC was processed as DRC, the gain efficiency (G:F) improved compared with CON, but the response to feeding EFC decreased from a 4.8% improvement to no improvement compared to CON as distiller grains increased from 0 to 30%, but was significantly improved due to feeding EFC in diets with 0 to 18% distiller grains. Feeding cattle EFC as DRC increased the average daily gain (ADG) and G:F by 4.5% compared with CON corn in diets containing Sweet Bran(®). No improvements in animal performance were observed when cattle were fed EFC compared to CON when processed as HMC in any situation. Feeding Enogen(®) corn improved the gain efficiency of finishing cattle compared with conventional corn when processed as dry-rolled corn and fed in diets with less than 20% distillers or diets that include Sweet Bran(®).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8532963
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85329632021-10-23 Impact of Feeding Syngenta Enogen(®) Feed Corn Compared to Control Corn in Different Diet Scenarios to Finishing Beef Cattle Volk, Stacia M. Wilson, Hannah C. Hanford, Kathryn J. MacDonald, James C. Erickson, Galen E. Animals (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: A pooled statistical analysis of seven experiments and 200 pen observations was performed to determine the impact of feeding Enogen(®) corn compared to conventional corn grain in beef cattle finishing diets. When the corn was compared as dry-rolled corn in diets with lower inclusion rates of distiller grains plus solubles (less than 20% of the diet), feeding Enogen(®) corn improved the efficiency of beef production. That response was a 4.8% improvement due to feeding Enogen(®) in a corn-based diet without distiller grains but was 1.8% in diets with 18 to 20% distiller grains. Feeding Enogen(®) corn improved the efficiency by 4.5% in diets with another common byproduct, Sweet Bran(®). Cattle performance was similar for Enogen(®) and conventional hybrids when processed and fed as high-moisture corn. Feeding Enogen(®) corn improves the gain efficiency of finishing cattle compared with conventional corn when fed as dry-rolled corn in diets with less than 20% distillers or diets that include Sweet Bran(®) feeds. ABSTRACT: The objective of this pooled statistical analysis was to evaluate Syngenta Enogen(®) Feed Corn (EFC) versus conventional corn (CON) when fed as either dry-rolled corn (DRC) or high-moisture corn (HMC) for effects on finishing beef cattle performance and carcass characteristics. Corns were evaluated in diets with byproduct inclusion rates of 0, 15, 18, 20, and 30% distiller grains or 25 and 35% Sweet Bran(®) (a commercial corn gluten feed product). Seven trials (n = 1856) consisting of 200 pen means comparing 26 diet treatments were analyzed using regression in a pooled analysis. When EFC was processed as DRC, the gain efficiency (G:F) improved compared with CON, but the response to feeding EFC decreased from a 4.8% improvement to no improvement compared to CON as distiller grains increased from 0 to 30%, but was significantly improved due to feeding EFC in diets with 0 to 18% distiller grains. Feeding cattle EFC as DRC increased the average daily gain (ADG) and G:F by 4.5% compared with CON corn in diets containing Sweet Bran(®). No improvements in animal performance were observed when cattle were fed EFC compared to CON when processed as HMC in any situation. Feeding Enogen(®) corn improved the gain efficiency of finishing cattle compared with conventional corn when processed as dry-rolled corn and fed in diets with less than 20% distillers or diets that include Sweet Bran(®). MDPI 2021-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8532963/ /pubmed/34679961 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11102940 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Volk, Stacia M.
Wilson, Hannah C.
Hanford, Kathryn J.
MacDonald, James C.
Erickson, Galen E.
Impact of Feeding Syngenta Enogen(®) Feed Corn Compared to Control Corn in Different Diet Scenarios to Finishing Beef Cattle
title Impact of Feeding Syngenta Enogen(®) Feed Corn Compared to Control Corn in Different Diet Scenarios to Finishing Beef Cattle
title_full Impact of Feeding Syngenta Enogen(®) Feed Corn Compared to Control Corn in Different Diet Scenarios to Finishing Beef Cattle
title_fullStr Impact of Feeding Syngenta Enogen(®) Feed Corn Compared to Control Corn in Different Diet Scenarios to Finishing Beef Cattle
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Feeding Syngenta Enogen(®) Feed Corn Compared to Control Corn in Different Diet Scenarios to Finishing Beef Cattle
title_short Impact of Feeding Syngenta Enogen(®) Feed Corn Compared to Control Corn in Different Diet Scenarios to Finishing Beef Cattle
title_sort impact of feeding syngenta enogen(®) feed corn compared to control corn in different diet scenarios to finishing beef cattle
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8532963/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34679961
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11102940
work_keys_str_mv AT volkstaciam impactoffeedingsyngentaenogenfeedcorncomparedtocontrolcornindifferentdietscenariostofinishingbeefcattle
AT wilsonhannahc impactoffeedingsyngentaenogenfeedcorncomparedtocontrolcornindifferentdietscenariostofinishingbeefcattle
AT hanfordkathrynj impactoffeedingsyngentaenogenfeedcorncomparedtocontrolcornindifferentdietscenariostofinishingbeefcattle
AT macdonaldjamesc impactoffeedingsyngentaenogenfeedcorncomparedtocontrolcornindifferentdietscenariostofinishingbeefcattle
AT ericksongalene impactoffeedingsyngentaenogenfeedcorncomparedtocontrolcornindifferentdietscenariostofinishingbeefcattle