Cargando…
Visual assessment of dynamic knee joint alignment in patients with patellofemoral pain: an agreement study
BACKGROUND: Assessment of knee kinematics plays an important role in the clinical examination of patients with patellofemoral pain (PFP). There is evidence that visual assessments are reliable in healthy subjects, but there is a lack of evidence in injured populations. The purpose of this study was...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8532969/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34721963 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12203 |
_version_ | 1784587198242226176 |
---|---|
author | Hansen, Rudi Lundgaard-Nielsen, Mathilde Henriksen, Marius |
author_facet | Hansen, Rudi Lundgaard-Nielsen, Mathilde Henriksen, Marius |
author_sort | Hansen, Rudi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Assessment of knee kinematics plays an important role in the clinical examination of patients with patellofemoral pain (PFP). There is evidence that visual assessments are reliable in healthy subjects, but there is a lack of evidence in injured populations. The purpose of this study was to examine the intra- and interrater agreement in the visual assessment of dynamic knee joint alignment in patients with PFP. METHODS: The study was a cross-sectional agreement study. Sixty participants (42 females) were included. We assessed the intra- and interrater agreement of two functional tests: The single leg squat (SLS) and the forward lunge (FL). One investigator scored the movement according to preset criteria while video recording the movement for retest. Moreover, the performance was scored by another investigator using the video recording. Agreement was assessed using weighted kappa statistics. RESULTS: The intrarater agreement ranged from moderate to good (Kappa 0.58 (FL) to 0.70 (SLS)) whereas the interrater agreement ranged from fair to moderate (Kappa 0.22 (SLS) to 0.50 (FL)). CONCLUSION: The agreement within raters was better than between raters, which suggests that assessments should preferably be performed by the same tester in research and in a clinical setting, e.g., to evaluate any treatment effect. We promote FL as a reliable clinical tool for evaluating dynamic knee alignment, since it shows equally good intra- and interrater agreement, and it is an inexpensive and easy method to use. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8532969 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85329692021-10-29 Visual assessment of dynamic knee joint alignment in patients with patellofemoral pain: an agreement study Hansen, Rudi Lundgaard-Nielsen, Mathilde Henriksen, Marius PeerJ Anesthesiology and Pain Management BACKGROUND: Assessment of knee kinematics plays an important role in the clinical examination of patients with patellofemoral pain (PFP). There is evidence that visual assessments are reliable in healthy subjects, but there is a lack of evidence in injured populations. The purpose of this study was to examine the intra- and interrater agreement in the visual assessment of dynamic knee joint alignment in patients with PFP. METHODS: The study was a cross-sectional agreement study. Sixty participants (42 females) were included. We assessed the intra- and interrater agreement of two functional tests: The single leg squat (SLS) and the forward lunge (FL). One investigator scored the movement according to preset criteria while video recording the movement for retest. Moreover, the performance was scored by another investigator using the video recording. Agreement was assessed using weighted kappa statistics. RESULTS: The intrarater agreement ranged from moderate to good (Kappa 0.58 (FL) to 0.70 (SLS)) whereas the interrater agreement ranged from fair to moderate (Kappa 0.22 (SLS) to 0.50 (FL)). CONCLUSION: The agreement within raters was better than between raters, which suggests that assessments should preferably be performed by the same tester in research and in a clinical setting, e.g., to evaluate any treatment effect. We promote FL as a reliable clinical tool for evaluating dynamic knee alignment, since it shows equally good intra- and interrater agreement, and it is an inexpensive and easy method to use. PeerJ Inc. 2021-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8532969/ /pubmed/34721963 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12203 Text en ©2021 Hansen et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Anesthesiology and Pain Management Hansen, Rudi Lundgaard-Nielsen, Mathilde Henriksen, Marius Visual assessment of dynamic knee joint alignment in patients with patellofemoral pain: an agreement study |
title | Visual assessment of dynamic knee joint alignment in patients with patellofemoral pain: an agreement study |
title_full | Visual assessment of dynamic knee joint alignment in patients with patellofemoral pain: an agreement study |
title_fullStr | Visual assessment of dynamic knee joint alignment in patients with patellofemoral pain: an agreement study |
title_full_unstemmed | Visual assessment of dynamic knee joint alignment in patients with patellofemoral pain: an agreement study |
title_short | Visual assessment of dynamic knee joint alignment in patients with patellofemoral pain: an agreement study |
title_sort | visual assessment of dynamic knee joint alignment in patients with patellofemoral pain: an agreement study |
topic | Anesthesiology and Pain Management |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8532969/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34721963 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12203 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hansenrudi visualassessmentofdynamickneejointalignmentinpatientswithpatellofemoralpainanagreementstudy AT lundgaardnielsenmathilde visualassessmentofdynamickneejointalignmentinpatientswithpatellofemoralpainanagreementstudy AT henriksenmarius visualassessmentofdynamickneejointalignmentinpatientswithpatellofemoralpainanagreementstudy |