Cargando…

Visual assessment of dynamic knee joint alignment in patients with patellofemoral pain: an agreement study

BACKGROUND: Assessment of knee kinematics plays an important role in the clinical examination of patients with patellofemoral pain (PFP). There is evidence that visual assessments are reliable in healthy subjects, but there is a lack of evidence in injured populations. The purpose of this study was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hansen, Rudi, Lundgaard-Nielsen, Mathilde, Henriksen, Marius
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8532969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34721963
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12203
_version_ 1784587198242226176
author Hansen, Rudi
Lundgaard-Nielsen, Mathilde
Henriksen, Marius
author_facet Hansen, Rudi
Lundgaard-Nielsen, Mathilde
Henriksen, Marius
author_sort Hansen, Rudi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Assessment of knee kinematics plays an important role in the clinical examination of patients with patellofemoral pain (PFP). There is evidence that visual assessments are reliable in healthy subjects, but there is a lack of evidence in injured populations. The purpose of this study was to examine the intra- and interrater agreement in the visual assessment of dynamic knee joint alignment in patients with PFP. METHODS: The study was a cross-sectional agreement study. Sixty participants (42 females) were included. We assessed the intra- and interrater agreement of two functional tests: The single leg squat (SLS) and the forward lunge (FL). One investigator scored the movement according to preset criteria while video recording the movement for retest. Moreover, the performance was scored by another investigator using the video recording. Agreement was assessed using weighted kappa statistics. RESULTS: The intrarater agreement ranged from moderate to good (Kappa 0.58 (FL) to 0.70 (SLS)) whereas the interrater agreement ranged from fair to moderate (Kappa 0.22 (SLS) to 0.50 (FL)). CONCLUSION: The agreement within raters was better than between raters, which suggests that assessments should preferably be performed by the same tester in research and in a clinical setting, e.g., to evaluate any treatment effect. We promote FL as a reliable clinical tool for evaluating dynamic knee alignment, since it shows equally good intra- and interrater agreement, and it is an inexpensive and easy method to use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8532969
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85329692021-10-29 Visual assessment of dynamic knee joint alignment in patients with patellofemoral pain: an agreement study Hansen, Rudi Lundgaard-Nielsen, Mathilde Henriksen, Marius PeerJ Anesthesiology and Pain Management BACKGROUND: Assessment of knee kinematics plays an important role in the clinical examination of patients with patellofemoral pain (PFP). There is evidence that visual assessments are reliable in healthy subjects, but there is a lack of evidence in injured populations. The purpose of this study was to examine the intra- and interrater agreement in the visual assessment of dynamic knee joint alignment in patients with PFP. METHODS: The study was a cross-sectional agreement study. Sixty participants (42 females) were included. We assessed the intra- and interrater agreement of two functional tests: The single leg squat (SLS) and the forward lunge (FL). One investigator scored the movement according to preset criteria while video recording the movement for retest. Moreover, the performance was scored by another investigator using the video recording. Agreement was assessed using weighted kappa statistics. RESULTS: The intrarater agreement ranged from moderate to good (Kappa 0.58 (FL) to 0.70 (SLS)) whereas the interrater agreement ranged from fair to moderate (Kappa 0.22 (SLS) to 0.50 (FL)). CONCLUSION: The agreement within raters was better than between raters, which suggests that assessments should preferably be performed by the same tester in research and in a clinical setting, e.g., to evaluate any treatment effect. We promote FL as a reliable clinical tool for evaluating dynamic knee alignment, since it shows equally good intra- and interrater agreement, and it is an inexpensive and easy method to use. PeerJ Inc. 2021-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8532969/ /pubmed/34721963 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12203 Text en ©2021 Hansen et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Anesthesiology and Pain Management
Hansen, Rudi
Lundgaard-Nielsen, Mathilde
Henriksen, Marius
Visual assessment of dynamic knee joint alignment in patients with patellofemoral pain: an agreement study
title Visual assessment of dynamic knee joint alignment in patients with patellofemoral pain: an agreement study
title_full Visual assessment of dynamic knee joint alignment in patients with patellofemoral pain: an agreement study
title_fullStr Visual assessment of dynamic knee joint alignment in patients with patellofemoral pain: an agreement study
title_full_unstemmed Visual assessment of dynamic knee joint alignment in patients with patellofemoral pain: an agreement study
title_short Visual assessment of dynamic knee joint alignment in patients with patellofemoral pain: an agreement study
title_sort visual assessment of dynamic knee joint alignment in patients with patellofemoral pain: an agreement study
topic Anesthesiology and Pain Management
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8532969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34721963
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12203
work_keys_str_mv AT hansenrudi visualassessmentofdynamickneejointalignmentinpatientswithpatellofemoralpainanagreementstudy
AT lundgaardnielsenmathilde visualassessmentofdynamickneejointalignmentinpatientswithpatellofemoralpainanagreementstudy
AT henriksenmarius visualassessmentofdynamickneejointalignmentinpatientswithpatellofemoralpainanagreementstudy