Cargando…
A New Approach to Assess Blinding for Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Treatment in Patients with Fibromyalgia. A Randomized Clinical Trial
Correct blinding is essential for preventing potential biases. The aim of this study was to assess the blinding of participants and a therapist following treatment with transcranial direct current stimulation in subjects with fibromyalgia using James’ and Bang’s blinding indexes. Eighty subjects wer...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8533681/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34679399 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11101335 |
_version_ | 1784587371880120320 |
---|---|
author | Arroyo-Fernández, Rubén Avendaño-Coy, Juan Velasco-Velasco, Rafael Palomo-Carrión, Rocío Bravo-Esteban, Elisabeth Ferri-Morales, Asunción |
author_facet | Arroyo-Fernández, Rubén Avendaño-Coy, Juan Velasco-Velasco, Rafael Palomo-Carrión, Rocío Bravo-Esteban, Elisabeth Ferri-Morales, Asunción |
author_sort | Arroyo-Fernández, Rubén |
collection | PubMed |
description | Correct blinding is essential for preventing potential biases. The aim of this study was to assess the blinding of participants and a therapist following treatment with transcranial direct current stimulation in subjects with fibromyalgia using James’ and Bang’s blinding indexes. Eighty subjects were randomly allocated either active or sham stimulation groups in an intervention of five sessions lasting 20 min each. A questionnaire was delivered to both the therapist and patients after the last session to record their guess of which treatment had been applied. No differences between the groups were noted at baseline in terms of demographic or clinical data. James’ BI was 0.83 (CI 95%: 0.76–0.90) for the patients and 0.55 (CI 95%: 0.45–0.64) for the therapist. Bang’s BI for subjects was −0.08 (CI 95%: −0.24–0.09) and −0.8 (CI 95%: −0.26–0.1) for the active and sham transcranial direct current stimulation groups, respectively. Bang’s BI for the therapist was 0.21 (CI 95%: −0.02–0.43) and 0.13 (CI 95%: −0.09–0.35) for the active and sham transcranial direct current stimulation groups, respectively. Protocols of active and sham transcranial direct current stimulation applied in this study have shown satisfactory blinding of the therapist and subjects with fibromyalgia. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8533681 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85336812021-10-23 A New Approach to Assess Blinding for Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Treatment in Patients with Fibromyalgia. A Randomized Clinical Trial Arroyo-Fernández, Rubén Avendaño-Coy, Juan Velasco-Velasco, Rafael Palomo-Carrión, Rocío Bravo-Esteban, Elisabeth Ferri-Morales, Asunción Brain Sci Article Correct blinding is essential for preventing potential biases. The aim of this study was to assess the blinding of participants and a therapist following treatment with transcranial direct current stimulation in subjects with fibromyalgia using James’ and Bang’s blinding indexes. Eighty subjects were randomly allocated either active or sham stimulation groups in an intervention of five sessions lasting 20 min each. A questionnaire was delivered to both the therapist and patients after the last session to record their guess of which treatment had been applied. No differences between the groups were noted at baseline in terms of demographic or clinical data. James’ BI was 0.83 (CI 95%: 0.76–0.90) for the patients and 0.55 (CI 95%: 0.45–0.64) for the therapist. Bang’s BI for subjects was −0.08 (CI 95%: −0.24–0.09) and −0.8 (CI 95%: −0.26–0.1) for the active and sham transcranial direct current stimulation groups, respectively. Bang’s BI for the therapist was 0.21 (CI 95%: −0.02–0.43) and 0.13 (CI 95%: −0.09–0.35) for the active and sham transcranial direct current stimulation groups, respectively. Protocols of active and sham transcranial direct current stimulation applied in this study have shown satisfactory blinding of the therapist and subjects with fibromyalgia. MDPI 2021-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8533681/ /pubmed/34679399 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11101335 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Arroyo-Fernández, Rubén Avendaño-Coy, Juan Velasco-Velasco, Rafael Palomo-Carrión, Rocío Bravo-Esteban, Elisabeth Ferri-Morales, Asunción A New Approach to Assess Blinding for Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Treatment in Patients with Fibromyalgia. A Randomized Clinical Trial |
title | A New Approach to Assess Blinding for Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Treatment in Patients with Fibromyalgia. A Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_full | A New Approach to Assess Blinding for Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Treatment in Patients with Fibromyalgia. A Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_fullStr | A New Approach to Assess Blinding for Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Treatment in Patients with Fibromyalgia. A Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | A New Approach to Assess Blinding for Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Treatment in Patients with Fibromyalgia. A Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_short | A New Approach to Assess Blinding for Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Treatment in Patients with Fibromyalgia. A Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_sort | new approach to assess blinding for transcranial direct current stimulation treatment in patients with fibromyalgia. a randomized clinical trial |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8533681/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34679399 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11101335 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT arroyofernandezruben anewapproachtoassessblindingfortranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationtreatmentinpatientswithfibromyalgiaarandomizedclinicaltrial AT avendanocoyjuan anewapproachtoassessblindingfortranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationtreatmentinpatientswithfibromyalgiaarandomizedclinicaltrial AT velascovelascorafael anewapproachtoassessblindingfortranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationtreatmentinpatientswithfibromyalgiaarandomizedclinicaltrial AT palomocarrionrocio anewapproachtoassessblindingfortranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationtreatmentinpatientswithfibromyalgiaarandomizedclinicaltrial AT bravoestebanelisabeth anewapproachtoassessblindingfortranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationtreatmentinpatientswithfibromyalgiaarandomizedclinicaltrial AT ferrimoralesasuncion anewapproachtoassessblindingfortranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationtreatmentinpatientswithfibromyalgiaarandomizedclinicaltrial AT arroyofernandezruben newapproachtoassessblindingfortranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationtreatmentinpatientswithfibromyalgiaarandomizedclinicaltrial AT avendanocoyjuan newapproachtoassessblindingfortranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationtreatmentinpatientswithfibromyalgiaarandomizedclinicaltrial AT velascovelascorafael newapproachtoassessblindingfortranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationtreatmentinpatientswithfibromyalgiaarandomizedclinicaltrial AT palomocarrionrocio newapproachtoassessblindingfortranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationtreatmentinpatientswithfibromyalgiaarandomizedclinicaltrial AT bravoestebanelisabeth newapproachtoassessblindingfortranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationtreatmentinpatientswithfibromyalgiaarandomizedclinicaltrial AT ferrimoralesasuncion newapproachtoassessblindingfortranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationtreatmentinpatientswithfibromyalgiaarandomizedclinicaltrial |