Cargando…

In the Era of Systemic Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Is Transarterial Chemoembolization Still a Card to Play?

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a growing healthcare problem, with most of the cases occurring in patients with an underlying chronic liver disease. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is recommended for unresectable tumors, mostly in a palliative setting. Several developments h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bucalau, Ana-Maria, Tancredi, Illario, Verset, Gontran
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8533902/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34680278
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13205129
_version_ 1784587425753858048
author Bucalau, Ana-Maria
Tancredi, Illario
Verset, Gontran
author_facet Bucalau, Ana-Maria
Tancredi, Illario
Verset, Gontran
author_sort Bucalau, Ana-Maria
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a growing healthcare problem, with most of the cases occurring in patients with an underlying chronic liver disease. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is recommended for unresectable tumors, mostly in a palliative setting. Several developments have seen the day during the last few years, with technique improvements in terms of efficacy and safety due to more selective therapies and better patient selection. Nevertheless, this is the era of systemic treatment for HCC, where immunotherapy and combination systemic treatments are taking the lead. As such, we have to ask ourselves, where does TACE stand today and is there a tomorrow? ABSTRACT: Conventional transarterial embolization (cTACE) has been proven to be effective for intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), with a recent systematic review showing an overall survival (OS) of 19.4 months. Nevertheless, due to the rapid development of the systemic therapeutic landscape, the place of TACE is becoming questionable. Is there still a niche for TACE in the era of immunotherapy and combination treatments such as atezolizumab–bevacizumab, which has shown an OS of 19.2 months with excellent tolerance? The development of drug-eluting microspheres (DEMs) has led to the standardization of the technique, and along with adequate selection, it showed an OS of 48 months in a retrospective study. In order to increase treatment selectivity, new catheters have also been added to the TACE arsenal as well as the use of cone-beam CT (CBCT), which provides three-dimensional volumetric images and guidance during procedures. Moreover, the TACE indications have also widened. It may serve as a “bridging therapy” for liver transplantation candidates while they are on the waiting list, and it represents a valuable downstaging tool to transplantation criteria. The aim of this review is to explore the current data on the advancements of TACE and its future place amongst the growing panel of treatments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8533902
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85339022021-10-23 In the Era of Systemic Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Is Transarterial Chemoembolization Still a Card to Play? Bucalau, Ana-Maria Tancredi, Illario Verset, Gontran Cancers (Basel) Review SIMPLE SUMMARY: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a growing healthcare problem, with most of the cases occurring in patients with an underlying chronic liver disease. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is recommended for unresectable tumors, mostly in a palliative setting. Several developments have seen the day during the last few years, with technique improvements in terms of efficacy and safety due to more selective therapies and better patient selection. Nevertheless, this is the era of systemic treatment for HCC, where immunotherapy and combination systemic treatments are taking the lead. As such, we have to ask ourselves, where does TACE stand today and is there a tomorrow? ABSTRACT: Conventional transarterial embolization (cTACE) has been proven to be effective for intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), with a recent systematic review showing an overall survival (OS) of 19.4 months. Nevertheless, due to the rapid development of the systemic therapeutic landscape, the place of TACE is becoming questionable. Is there still a niche for TACE in the era of immunotherapy and combination treatments such as atezolizumab–bevacizumab, which has shown an OS of 19.2 months with excellent tolerance? The development of drug-eluting microspheres (DEMs) has led to the standardization of the technique, and along with adequate selection, it showed an OS of 48 months in a retrospective study. In order to increase treatment selectivity, new catheters have also been added to the TACE arsenal as well as the use of cone-beam CT (CBCT), which provides three-dimensional volumetric images and guidance during procedures. Moreover, the TACE indications have also widened. It may serve as a “bridging therapy” for liver transplantation candidates while they are on the waiting list, and it represents a valuable downstaging tool to transplantation criteria. The aim of this review is to explore the current data on the advancements of TACE and its future place amongst the growing panel of treatments. MDPI 2021-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8533902/ /pubmed/34680278 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13205129 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Bucalau, Ana-Maria
Tancredi, Illario
Verset, Gontran
In the Era of Systemic Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Is Transarterial Chemoembolization Still a Card to Play?
title In the Era of Systemic Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Is Transarterial Chemoembolization Still a Card to Play?
title_full In the Era of Systemic Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Is Transarterial Chemoembolization Still a Card to Play?
title_fullStr In the Era of Systemic Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Is Transarterial Chemoembolization Still a Card to Play?
title_full_unstemmed In the Era of Systemic Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Is Transarterial Chemoembolization Still a Card to Play?
title_short In the Era of Systemic Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Is Transarterial Chemoembolization Still a Card to Play?
title_sort in the era of systemic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma is transarterial chemoembolization still a card to play?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8533902/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34680278
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13205129
work_keys_str_mv AT bucalauanamaria intheeraofsystemictherapyforhepatocellularcarcinomaistransarterialchemoembolizationstillacardtoplay
AT tancrediillario intheeraofsystemictherapyforhepatocellularcarcinomaistransarterialchemoembolizationstillacardtoplay
AT versetgontran intheeraofsystemictherapyforhepatocellularcarcinomaistransarterialchemoembolizationstillacardtoplay