Cargando…

Prognostic Radiological Tools for Clinical Stage IA Pure Solid Lung Cancer

In this study, we analyzed prognostic radiological tools and surgical outcomes for radiologically pure solid adenocarcinomas (AD) and squamous cell carcinoma (SQ) in clinical stage IA. We retrospectively investigated 130 patients who underwent surgical resections. We assessed the predictive risk fac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nakada, Takeo, Takahashi, Yusuke, Sakakura, Noriaki, Iwata, Hiroshi, Ohtsuka, Takashi, Kuroda, Hiroaki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8534325/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34677246
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol28050328
_version_ 1784587525619187712
author Nakada, Takeo
Takahashi, Yusuke
Sakakura, Noriaki
Iwata, Hiroshi
Ohtsuka, Takashi
Kuroda, Hiroaki
author_facet Nakada, Takeo
Takahashi, Yusuke
Sakakura, Noriaki
Iwata, Hiroshi
Ohtsuka, Takashi
Kuroda, Hiroaki
author_sort Nakada, Takeo
collection PubMed
description In this study, we analyzed prognostic radiological tools and surgical outcomes for radiologically pure solid adenocarcinomas (AD) and squamous cell carcinoma (SQ) in clinical stage IA. We retrospectively investigated 130 patients who underwent surgical resections. We assessed the predictive risk factors for recurrence and pathological lymph node metastasis (LNM). There was no statistical difference in recurrence free survival (RFS) or cancer-specific survival (CSS) between AD and SQ groups (p = 0.642 and p = 0.403, respectively). In the whole cohort, tumor size on lung window and mediastinal settings, and tumor disappearance ratio using high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) were not prognostic parameters (p = 0.127, 0.066, and 0.082, respectively). The maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax) using positron emission tomography-CT was associated with recurrence (p = 0.016). According to the receiver operating characteristic curve, the cut-off value of SUVmax for recurrence was 4.6 (p = 0.016). The quantitative continuous variables using any radiological tools were not associated with LNM. However, tumor diameter on mediastinal setting ≥8 mm with SUVmax ≥2.4 could be a risk factor for LNM. Pure solid AD and SQ were equivalent for the RFS and CSS. SUVmax was useful to predict recurrence. The tumor diameter on a mediastinal setting and SUVmax were useful in predicting pathological LNM.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8534325
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85343252021-10-23 Prognostic Radiological Tools for Clinical Stage IA Pure Solid Lung Cancer Nakada, Takeo Takahashi, Yusuke Sakakura, Noriaki Iwata, Hiroshi Ohtsuka, Takashi Kuroda, Hiroaki Curr Oncol Article In this study, we analyzed prognostic radiological tools and surgical outcomes for radiologically pure solid adenocarcinomas (AD) and squamous cell carcinoma (SQ) in clinical stage IA. We retrospectively investigated 130 patients who underwent surgical resections. We assessed the predictive risk factors for recurrence and pathological lymph node metastasis (LNM). There was no statistical difference in recurrence free survival (RFS) or cancer-specific survival (CSS) between AD and SQ groups (p = 0.642 and p = 0.403, respectively). In the whole cohort, tumor size on lung window and mediastinal settings, and tumor disappearance ratio using high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) were not prognostic parameters (p = 0.127, 0.066, and 0.082, respectively). The maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax) using positron emission tomography-CT was associated with recurrence (p = 0.016). According to the receiver operating characteristic curve, the cut-off value of SUVmax for recurrence was 4.6 (p = 0.016). The quantitative continuous variables using any radiological tools were not associated with LNM. However, tumor diameter on mediastinal setting ≥8 mm with SUVmax ≥2.4 could be a risk factor for LNM. Pure solid AD and SQ were equivalent for the RFS and CSS. SUVmax was useful to predict recurrence. The tumor diameter on a mediastinal setting and SUVmax were useful in predicting pathological LNM. MDPI 2021-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8534325/ /pubmed/34677246 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol28050328 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Nakada, Takeo
Takahashi, Yusuke
Sakakura, Noriaki
Iwata, Hiroshi
Ohtsuka, Takashi
Kuroda, Hiroaki
Prognostic Radiological Tools for Clinical Stage IA Pure Solid Lung Cancer
title Prognostic Radiological Tools for Clinical Stage IA Pure Solid Lung Cancer
title_full Prognostic Radiological Tools for Clinical Stage IA Pure Solid Lung Cancer
title_fullStr Prognostic Radiological Tools for Clinical Stage IA Pure Solid Lung Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic Radiological Tools for Clinical Stage IA Pure Solid Lung Cancer
title_short Prognostic Radiological Tools for Clinical Stage IA Pure Solid Lung Cancer
title_sort prognostic radiological tools for clinical stage ia pure solid lung cancer
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8534325/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34677246
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol28050328
work_keys_str_mv AT nakadatakeo prognosticradiologicaltoolsforclinicalstageiapuresolidlungcancer
AT takahashiyusuke prognosticradiologicaltoolsforclinicalstageiapuresolidlungcancer
AT sakakuranoriaki prognosticradiologicaltoolsforclinicalstageiapuresolidlungcancer
AT iwatahiroshi prognosticradiologicaltoolsforclinicalstageiapuresolidlungcancer
AT ohtsukatakashi prognosticradiologicaltoolsforclinicalstageiapuresolidlungcancer
AT kurodahiroaki prognosticradiologicaltoolsforclinicalstageiapuresolidlungcancer