Cargando…

Diagnostic Performance of Dual-Energy Subtraction Radiography for the Detection of Pulmonary Emphysema: An Intra-Individual Comparison

Purpose/Objectives: To compare the diagnostic performance of dual-energy subtraction (DE) and conventional radiography (CR) for detecting pulmonary emphysema using computed tomography (CT) as a reference standard. Methods and Materials: Sixty-six patients (24 female, median age 73) were retrospectiv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mueller, Julia A., Martini, Katharina, Eberhard, Matthias, Mueller, Mathias A., De Silvestro, Alessandra A., Breiding, Philipp, Frauenfelder, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8534440/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34679547
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11101849
_version_ 1784587553470414848
author Mueller, Julia A.
Martini, Katharina
Eberhard, Matthias
Mueller, Mathias A.
De Silvestro, Alessandra A.
Breiding, Philipp
Frauenfelder, Thomas
author_facet Mueller, Julia A.
Martini, Katharina
Eberhard, Matthias
Mueller, Mathias A.
De Silvestro, Alessandra A.
Breiding, Philipp
Frauenfelder, Thomas
author_sort Mueller, Julia A.
collection PubMed
description Purpose/Objectives: To compare the diagnostic performance of dual-energy subtraction (DE) and conventional radiography (CR) for detecting pulmonary emphysema using computed tomography (CT) as a reference standard. Methods and Materials: Sixty-six patients (24 female, median age 73) were retrospectively included after obtaining lateral and posteroanterior chest X-rays with a dual-shot DE technique and chest CT within ±3 months. Two experienced radiologists first evaluated the standard CR images and, second, the bone-/soft tissue weighted DE images for the presence (yes/no), degree (1–4), and quadrant-based distribution of emphysema. CT was used as a reference standard. Inter-reader agreement was calculated. Sensitivity and specificity for the correct detection and localization of emphysema was calculated. Further degree of emphysema on CR and DE was correlated with results from CT. A p-value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results: The mean interreader agreement was substantial for CR and moderate for DE (k(CR) = 0.611 vs. k(DE) = 0.433; respectively). Sensitivity, as well as specificity for the detection of emphysema, was comparable between CR and DE (sensitivity(CR) 96% and specificity(CR) 75% vs. sensitivity(DE) 91% and specificity(DE) 83%; p = 0.157). Similarly, there was no significant difference in the sensitivity or specificity for emphysema localization between CR and DE (sensitivity(CR) 50% and specificity(CR) 100% vs. sensitivity(DE) 57% and specificity(DE) 100%; p = 0.157). There was a slightly better correlation with CT of emphysema grading in DE compared to CR (r(DE) = 0.75 vs. r(CR) = 0.68; p = 0.108); these differences were not statistically significant, however. Conclusion: Diagnostic accuracy for the detection, quantification, and localization of emphysema between CR and DE is comparable. Interreader agreement, however, is better with CR compared to DE
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8534440
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85344402021-10-23 Diagnostic Performance of Dual-Energy Subtraction Radiography for the Detection of Pulmonary Emphysema: An Intra-Individual Comparison Mueller, Julia A. Martini, Katharina Eberhard, Matthias Mueller, Mathias A. De Silvestro, Alessandra A. Breiding, Philipp Frauenfelder, Thomas Diagnostics (Basel) Article Purpose/Objectives: To compare the diagnostic performance of dual-energy subtraction (DE) and conventional radiography (CR) for detecting pulmonary emphysema using computed tomography (CT) as a reference standard. Methods and Materials: Sixty-six patients (24 female, median age 73) were retrospectively included after obtaining lateral and posteroanterior chest X-rays with a dual-shot DE technique and chest CT within ±3 months. Two experienced radiologists first evaluated the standard CR images and, second, the bone-/soft tissue weighted DE images for the presence (yes/no), degree (1–4), and quadrant-based distribution of emphysema. CT was used as a reference standard. Inter-reader agreement was calculated. Sensitivity and specificity for the correct detection and localization of emphysema was calculated. Further degree of emphysema on CR and DE was correlated with results from CT. A p-value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results: The mean interreader agreement was substantial for CR and moderate for DE (k(CR) = 0.611 vs. k(DE) = 0.433; respectively). Sensitivity, as well as specificity for the detection of emphysema, was comparable between CR and DE (sensitivity(CR) 96% and specificity(CR) 75% vs. sensitivity(DE) 91% and specificity(DE) 83%; p = 0.157). Similarly, there was no significant difference in the sensitivity or specificity for emphysema localization between CR and DE (sensitivity(CR) 50% and specificity(CR) 100% vs. sensitivity(DE) 57% and specificity(DE) 100%; p = 0.157). There was a slightly better correlation with CT of emphysema grading in DE compared to CR (r(DE) = 0.75 vs. r(CR) = 0.68; p = 0.108); these differences were not statistically significant, however. Conclusion: Diagnostic accuracy for the detection, quantification, and localization of emphysema between CR and DE is comparable. Interreader agreement, however, is better with CR compared to DE MDPI 2021-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8534440/ /pubmed/34679547 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11101849 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Mueller, Julia A.
Martini, Katharina
Eberhard, Matthias
Mueller, Mathias A.
De Silvestro, Alessandra A.
Breiding, Philipp
Frauenfelder, Thomas
Diagnostic Performance of Dual-Energy Subtraction Radiography for the Detection of Pulmonary Emphysema: An Intra-Individual Comparison
title Diagnostic Performance of Dual-Energy Subtraction Radiography for the Detection of Pulmonary Emphysema: An Intra-Individual Comparison
title_full Diagnostic Performance of Dual-Energy Subtraction Radiography for the Detection of Pulmonary Emphysema: An Intra-Individual Comparison
title_fullStr Diagnostic Performance of Dual-Energy Subtraction Radiography for the Detection of Pulmonary Emphysema: An Intra-Individual Comparison
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Performance of Dual-Energy Subtraction Radiography for the Detection of Pulmonary Emphysema: An Intra-Individual Comparison
title_short Diagnostic Performance of Dual-Energy Subtraction Radiography for the Detection of Pulmonary Emphysema: An Intra-Individual Comparison
title_sort diagnostic performance of dual-energy subtraction radiography for the detection of pulmonary emphysema: an intra-individual comparison
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8534440/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34679547
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11101849
work_keys_str_mv AT muellerjuliaa diagnosticperformanceofdualenergysubtractionradiographyforthedetectionofpulmonaryemphysemaanintraindividualcomparison
AT martinikatharina diagnosticperformanceofdualenergysubtractionradiographyforthedetectionofpulmonaryemphysemaanintraindividualcomparison
AT eberhardmatthias diagnosticperformanceofdualenergysubtractionradiographyforthedetectionofpulmonaryemphysemaanintraindividualcomparison
AT muellermathiasa diagnosticperformanceofdualenergysubtractionradiographyforthedetectionofpulmonaryemphysemaanintraindividualcomparison
AT desilvestroalessandraa diagnosticperformanceofdualenergysubtractionradiographyforthedetectionofpulmonaryemphysemaanintraindividualcomparison
AT breidingphilipp diagnosticperformanceofdualenergysubtractionradiographyforthedetectionofpulmonaryemphysemaanintraindividualcomparison
AT frauenfelderthomas diagnosticperformanceofdualenergysubtractionradiographyforthedetectionofpulmonaryemphysemaanintraindividualcomparison