Cargando…

Impact of Split Dosing the First Rituximab Infusion in Patients with High Lymphocyte Count

The most common adverse reactions to rituximab are infusion-related reactions (IRR). We evaluated the efficacy of split dosing the first rituximab infusion over two days to reduce IRR incidence in patients with hematological cancer and a high lymphocyte count. This is a retrospective observational s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Plante, Maude, Garneau, Laurence, Laprise-Lachance, Magali, Lemieux, Pierre, Dorval, Michel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8534443/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34677267
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol28050349
_version_ 1784587554212806656
author Plante, Maude
Garneau, Laurence
Laprise-Lachance, Magali
Lemieux, Pierre
Dorval, Michel
author_facet Plante, Maude
Garneau, Laurence
Laprise-Lachance, Magali
Lemieux, Pierre
Dorval, Michel
author_sort Plante, Maude
collection PubMed
description The most common adverse reactions to rituximab are infusion-related reactions (IRR). We evaluated the efficacy of split dosing the first rituximab infusion over two days to reduce IRR incidence in patients with hematological cancer and a high lymphocyte count. This is a retrospective observational study conducted in two healthcare centers in Quebec, Canada. The study enrolled patients with white blood cell counts ≥25.0 × 10(9)/L who received their first rituximab dose for hematological cancer between December 2007 and May 2020. One healthcare center used asymmetrical split dosing, while the other used symmetrical split dosing. A total of 183 treatment episodes were collected from 143 patients. Among patients who received a fractionated dosing schedule, 42% developed an IRR from the first rituximab infusion compared with 50% for the standard protocol (adjusted relative risk, 0.89; p = 0.540). No significant difference was observed in IRR severity between either groups. However, 24% of patients who received the asymmetrical protocol developed an IRR compared to 68% for the symmetrical protocol (adjusted relative risk, 0.32; p = 0.003). These results suggest that an asymmetrical split dosing could be effective in reducing the incidence of IRR and is preferable to a symmetrical one.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8534443
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85344432021-10-23 Impact of Split Dosing the First Rituximab Infusion in Patients with High Lymphocyte Count Plante, Maude Garneau, Laurence Laprise-Lachance, Magali Lemieux, Pierre Dorval, Michel Curr Oncol Article The most common adverse reactions to rituximab are infusion-related reactions (IRR). We evaluated the efficacy of split dosing the first rituximab infusion over two days to reduce IRR incidence in patients with hematological cancer and a high lymphocyte count. This is a retrospective observational study conducted in two healthcare centers in Quebec, Canada. The study enrolled patients with white blood cell counts ≥25.0 × 10(9)/L who received their first rituximab dose for hematological cancer between December 2007 and May 2020. One healthcare center used asymmetrical split dosing, while the other used symmetrical split dosing. A total of 183 treatment episodes were collected from 143 patients. Among patients who received a fractionated dosing schedule, 42% developed an IRR from the first rituximab infusion compared with 50% for the standard protocol (adjusted relative risk, 0.89; p = 0.540). No significant difference was observed in IRR severity between either groups. However, 24% of patients who received the asymmetrical protocol developed an IRR compared to 68% for the symmetrical protocol (adjusted relative risk, 0.32; p = 0.003). These results suggest that an asymmetrical split dosing could be effective in reducing the incidence of IRR and is preferable to a symmetrical one. MDPI 2021-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8534443/ /pubmed/34677267 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol28050349 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Plante, Maude
Garneau, Laurence
Laprise-Lachance, Magali
Lemieux, Pierre
Dorval, Michel
Impact of Split Dosing the First Rituximab Infusion in Patients with High Lymphocyte Count
title Impact of Split Dosing the First Rituximab Infusion in Patients with High Lymphocyte Count
title_full Impact of Split Dosing the First Rituximab Infusion in Patients with High Lymphocyte Count
title_fullStr Impact of Split Dosing the First Rituximab Infusion in Patients with High Lymphocyte Count
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Split Dosing the First Rituximab Infusion in Patients with High Lymphocyte Count
title_short Impact of Split Dosing the First Rituximab Infusion in Patients with High Lymphocyte Count
title_sort impact of split dosing the first rituximab infusion in patients with high lymphocyte count
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8534443/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34677267
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol28050349
work_keys_str_mv AT plantemaude impactofsplitdosingthefirstrituximabinfusioninpatientswithhighlymphocytecount
AT garneaulaurence impactofsplitdosingthefirstrituximabinfusioninpatientswithhighlymphocytecount
AT lapriselachancemagali impactofsplitdosingthefirstrituximabinfusioninpatientswithhighlymphocytecount
AT lemieuxpierre impactofsplitdosingthefirstrituximabinfusioninpatientswithhighlymphocytecount
AT dorvalmichel impactofsplitdosingthefirstrituximabinfusioninpatientswithhighlymphocytecount