Cargando…
An Image-Based Workflow for Objective Vessel Wall Enhancement Quantification in Intracranial Aneurysms
Background: VWE in contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a potential biomarker for the evaluation of IA. The common practice to identify IAs with VWE is mainly based on a visual inspection of MR images, which is subject to errors and inconsistencies. Here, we develop and validate a t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8534502/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34679440 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11101742 |
Sumario: | Background: VWE in contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a potential biomarker for the evaluation of IA. The common practice to identify IAs with VWE is mainly based on a visual inspection of MR images, which is subject to errors and inconsistencies. Here, we develop and validate a tool for the visualization, quantification and objective identification of regions with VWE. Methods: N = 41 3D T1-MRI and 3D TOF-MRA IA images from 38 patients were obtained and co-registered. A contrast-enhanced MRI was normalized by the enhancement intensity of the pituitary stalk and signal intensities were mapped onto the surface of IA models generated from segmented MRA. N = 30 IAs were used to identify the optimal signal intensity value to distinguish the enhancing and non-enhancing regions (marked by an experienced neuroradiologist). The remaining IAs (n = 11) were used to validate the threshold. We tested if the enhancement area ratio (EAR—ratio of the enhancing area to the IA surface-area) could identify high risk aneurysms as identified by the ISUIA clinical score. Results: A normalized intensity of 0.276 was the optimal threshold to delineate enhancing regions, with a validation accuracy of 81.7%. In comparing the overlap between the identified enhancement regions against those marked by the neuroradiologist, our method had a dice coefficient of 71.1%. An EAR of 23% was able to discriminate high-risk cases with an AUC of 0.7. Conclusions: We developed and validated a pipeline for the visualization and objective identification of VWE regions that could potentially help evaluation of IAs become more reliable and consistent. |
---|