Cargando…
Diagnostic Accuracy of Non-Invasive Imaging for Detection of Colonic Inflammation in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Endoscopy is the gold standard for objective assessment of colonic disease activity in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Non-invasive colonic imaging using bowel ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may have a role in quantifying colonic disease activity. W...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8534724/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34679624 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11101926 |
_version_ | 1784587613577936896 |
---|---|
author | Alshammari, Meshari T. Stevenson, Rebecca Abdul-Aema, Buraq Zou, Guangyong Jairath, Vipul Radford, Shellie Marciani, Luca Moran, Gordon W. |
author_facet | Alshammari, Meshari T. Stevenson, Rebecca Abdul-Aema, Buraq Zou, Guangyong Jairath, Vipul Radford, Shellie Marciani, Luca Moran, Gordon W. |
author_sort | Alshammari, Meshari T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Endoscopy is the gold standard for objective assessment of colonic disease activity in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Non-invasive colonic imaging using bowel ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may have a role in quantifying colonic disease activity. We reviewed the diagnostic accuracy of these modalities for assessment of endoscopically or histopathologically defined colonic disease activity in IBD. We searched Embase, MEDLINE, and the Web of Science from inception to 20 September 2021. QUADAS-2 was used to evaluate the studies’ quality. A meta-analysis was performed using a bivariate model approach separately for MRI and US studies only, and summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were obtained. CT studies were excluded due to the absence of diagnostic test data. Thirty-seven studies were included. The mean sensitivity and specificity for MRI studies was 0.75 and 0.91, respectively, while for US studies it was 0.82 and 0.90, respectively. The area under the ROC curves (AUC) was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.82 to 0.93) for MRI, and 0.90 (95% CI, 0.75 to 1.00) for US. Both MRI and US show high diagnostic accuracy in the assessment of colonic disease activity in IBD patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8534724 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85347242021-10-23 Diagnostic Accuracy of Non-Invasive Imaging for Detection of Colonic Inflammation in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Alshammari, Meshari T. Stevenson, Rebecca Abdul-Aema, Buraq Zou, Guangyong Jairath, Vipul Radford, Shellie Marciani, Luca Moran, Gordon W. Diagnostics (Basel) Review Endoscopy is the gold standard for objective assessment of colonic disease activity in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Non-invasive colonic imaging using bowel ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may have a role in quantifying colonic disease activity. We reviewed the diagnostic accuracy of these modalities for assessment of endoscopically or histopathologically defined colonic disease activity in IBD. We searched Embase, MEDLINE, and the Web of Science from inception to 20 September 2021. QUADAS-2 was used to evaluate the studies’ quality. A meta-analysis was performed using a bivariate model approach separately for MRI and US studies only, and summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were obtained. CT studies were excluded due to the absence of diagnostic test data. Thirty-seven studies were included. The mean sensitivity and specificity for MRI studies was 0.75 and 0.91, respectively, while for US studies it was 0.82 and 0.90, respectively. The area under the ROC curves (AUC) was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.82 to 0.93) for MRI, and 0.90 (95% CI, 0.75 to 1.00) for US. Both MRI and US show high diagnostic accuracy in the assessment of colonic disease activity in IBD patients. MDPI 2021-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8534724/ /pubmed/34679624 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11101926 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Alshammari, Meshari T. Stevenson, Rebecca Abdul-Aema, Buraq Zou, Guangyong Jairath, Vipul Radford, Shellie Marciani, Luca Moran, Gordon W. Diagnostic Accuracy of Non-Invasive Imaging for Detection of Colonic Inflammation in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Diagnostic Accuracy of Non-Invasive Imaging for Detection of Colonic Inflammation in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Diagnostic Accuracy of Non-Invasive Imaging for Detection of Colonic Inflammation in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic Accuracy of Non-Invasive Imaging for Detection of Colonic Inflammation in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic Accuracy of Non-Invasive Imaging for Detection of Colonic Inflammation in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Diagnostic Accuracy of Non-Invasive Imaging for Detection of Colonic Inflammation in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive imaging for detection of colonic inflammation in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8534724/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34679624 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11101926 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alshammarimesharit diagnosticaccuracyofnoninvasiveimagingfordetectionofcolonicinflammationinpatientswithinflammatoryboweldiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT stevensonrebecca diagnosticaccuracyofnoninvasiveimagingfordetectionofcolonicinflammationinpatientswithinflammatoryboweldiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT abdulaemaburaq diagnosticaccuracyofnoninvasiveimagingfordetectionofcolonicinflammationinpatientswithinflammatoryboweldiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zouguangyong diagnosticaccuracyofnoninvasiveimagingfordetectionofcolonicinflammationinpatientswithinflammatoryboweldiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT jairathvipul diagnosticaccuracyofnoninvasiveimagingfordetectionofcolonicinflammationinpatientswithinflammatoryboweldiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT radfordshellie diagnosticaccuracyofnoninvasiveimagingfordetectionofcolonicinflammationinpatientswithinflammatoryboweldiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT marcianiluca diagnosticaccuracyofnoninvasiveimagingfordetectionofcolonicinflammationinpatientswithinflammatoryboweldiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT morangordonw diagnosticaccuracyofnoninvasiveimagingfordetectionofcolonicinflammationinpatientswithinflammatoryboweldiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |