Cargando…
Cognitive Assessment Tools Recommended in Geriatric Oncology Guidelines: A Rapid Review
Cognitive assessment is a cornerstone of geriatric care. Cognitive impairment has the potential to significantly impact multiple phases of a person’s cancer care experience. Accurately identifying this vulnerability is a challenge for many cancer care clinicians, thus the use of validated cognitive...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8534877/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34677257 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol28050339 |
_version_ | 1784587649419313152 |
---|---|
author | Tuch, Gina Soo, Wee Kheng Luo, Ki-Yung Frearson, Kinglsey Oh, Ek Leone Phillips, Jane L. Agar, Meera Lane, Heather |
author_facet | Tuch, Gina Soo, Wee Kheng Luo, Ki-Yung Frearson, Kinglsey Oh, Ek Leone Phillips, Jane L. Agar, Meera Lane, Heather |
author_sort | Tuch, Gina |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cognitive assessment is a cornerstone of geriatric care. Cognitive impairment has the potential to significantly impact multiple phases of a person’s cancer care experience. Accurately identifying this vulnerability is a challenge for many cancer care clinicians, thus the use of validated cognitive assessment tools are recommended. As international cancer guidelines for older adults recommend Geriatric Assessment (GA) which includes an evaluation of cognition, clinicians need to be familiar with the overall interpretation of the commonly used cognitive assessment tools. This rapid review investigated the cognitive assessment tools that were most frequently recommended by Geriatric Oncology guidelines: Blessed Orientation-Memory-Concentration test (BOMC), Clock Drawing Test (CDT), Mini-Cog, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ). A detailed appraisal of the strengths and limitations of each tool was conducted, with a focus on practical aspects of implementing cognitive assessment tools into real-world clinical settings. Finally, recommendations on choosing an assessment tool and the additional considerations beyond screening are discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8534877 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85348772021-10-23 Cognitive Assessment Tools Recommended in Geriatric Oncology Guidelines: A Rapid Review Tuch, Gina Soo, Wee Kheng Luo, Ki-Yung Frearson, Kinglsey Oh, Ek Leone Phillips, Jane L. Agar, Meera Lane, Heather Curr Oncol Review Cognitive assessment is a cornerstone of geriatric care. Cognitive impairment has the potential to significantly impact multiple phases of a person’s cancer care experience. Accurately identifying this vulnerability is a challenge for many cancer care clinicians, thus the use of validated cognitive assessment tools are recommended. As international cancer guidelines for older adults recommend Geriatric Assessment (GA) which includes an evaluation of cognition, clinicians need to be familiar with the overall interpretation of the commonly used cognitive assessment tools. This rapid review investigated the cognitive assessment tools that were most frequently recommended by Geriatric Oncology guidelines: Blessed Orientation-Memory-Concentration test (BOMC), Clock Drawing Test (CDT), Mini-Cog, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ). A detailed appraisal of the strengths and limitations of each tool was conducted, with a focus on practical aspects of implementing cognitive assessment tools into real-world clinical settings. Finally, recommendations on choosing an assessment tool and the additional considerations beyond screening are discussed. MDPI 2021-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8534877/ /pubmed/34677257 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol28050339 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Tuch, Gina Soo, Wee Kheng Luo, Ki-Yung Frearson, Kinglsey Oh, Ek Leone Phillips, Jane L. Agar, Meera Lane, Heather Cognitive Assessment Tools Recommended in Geriatric Oncology Guidelines: A Rapid Review |
title | Cognitive Assessment Tools Recommended in Geriatric Oncology Guidelines: A Rapid Review |
title_full | Cognitive Assessment Tools Recommended in Geriatric Oncology Guidelines: A Rapid Review |
title_fullStr | Cognitive Assessment Tools Recommended in Geriatric Oncology Guidelines: A Rapid Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Cognitive Assessment Tools Recommended in Geriatric Oncology Guidelines: A Rapid Review |
title_short | Cognitive Assessment Tools Recommended in Geriatric Oncology Guidelines: A Rapid Review |
title_sort | cognitive assessment tools recommended in geriatric oncology guidelines: a rapid review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8534877/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34677257 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol28050339 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tuchgina cognitiveassessmenttoolsrecommendedingeriatriconcologyguidelinesarapidreview AT sooweekheng cognitiveassessmenttoolsrecommendedingeriatriconcologyguidelinesarapidreview AT luokiyung cognitiveassessmenttoolsrecommendedingeriatriconcologyguidelinesarapidreview AT frearsonkinglsey cognitiveassessmenttoolsrecommendedingeriatriconcologyguidelinesarapidreview AT ohekleone cognitiveassessmenttoolsrecommendedingeriatriconcologyguidelinesarapidreview AT phillipsjanel cognitiveassessmenttoolsrecommendedingeriatriconcologyguidelinesarapidreview AT agarmeera cognitiveassessmenttoolsrecommendedingeriatriconcologyguidelinesarapidreview AT laneheather cognitiveassessmenttoolsrecommendedingeriatriconcologyguidelinesarapidreview |