Cargando…
Monitoring of Food Waste Anaerobic Digestion Performance: Conventional Co-Substrates vs. Unmarketable Biochar Additions
This study proposed the selection of cost-effective additives generated from different activity sectors to enhance and stabilize the start-up, as well as the transitional phases, of semi-continuous food waste (FW) anaerobic digestion. The results showed that combining agricultural waste mixtures inc...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8535009/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34681402 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10102353 |
_version_ | 1784587674190872576 |
---|---|
author | Chaher, Nour El Houda Nassour, Abdallah Hamdi, Moktar Nelles, Michael |
author_facet | Chaher, Nour El Houda Nassour, Abdallah Hamdi, Moktar Nelles, Michael |
author_sort | Chaher, Nour El Houda |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study proposed the selection of cost-effective additives generated from different activity sectors to enhance and stabilize the start-up, as well as the transitional phases, of semi-continuous food waste (FW) anaerobic digestion. The results showed that combining agricultural waste mixtures including wheat straw (WS) and cattle manure (CM) boosted the process performance and generated up to 95% higher methane yield compared to the control reactors (mono-digested FW) under an organic loading rate (OLR) range of 2 to 3 kg VS/m(3)·d. Whereas R3 amended with unmarketable biochar (UBc), to around 10% of the initial fresh mass inserted, showed a significant process enhancement during the transitional phase, and more particularly at an OLR of 4 kg VS/m(3)·d, it was revealed that under these experimental conditions, FW reactors including UBc showed an increase of 144% in terms of specific biogas yield (SBY) compared to FW reactors fed with agricultural residue. Hence, both agricultural and industrial waste were efficacious when it came to boosting either FW anaerobic performance or AD effluent quality. Although each co-substrate performed under specific experimental conditions, this feature provides decision makers with diverse alternatives to implement a sustainable organic waste management system, conveying sufficient technical details to draw up appropriate designs for the recovery of various types of organic residue. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8535009 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85350092021-10-23 Monitoring of Food Waste Anaerobic Digestion Performance: Conventional Co-Substrates vs. Unmarketable Biochar Additions Chaher, Nour El Houda Nassour, Abdallah Hamdi, Moktar Nelles, Michael Foods Article This study proposed the selection of cost-effective additives generated from different activity sectors to enhance and stabilize the start-up, as well as the transitional phases, of semi-continuous food waste (FW) anaerobic digestion. The results showed that combining agricultural waste mixtures including wheat straw (WS) and cattle manure (CM) boosted the process performance and generated up to 95% higher methane yield compared to the control reactors (mono-digested FW) under an organic loading rate (OLR) range of 2 to 3 kg VS/m(3)·d. Whereas R3 amended with unmarketable biochar (UBc), to around 10% of the initial fresh mass inserted, showed a significant process enhancement during the transitional phase, and more particularly at an OLR of 4 kg VS/m(3)·d, it was revealed that under these experimental conditions, FW reactors including UBc showed an increase of 144% in terms of specific biogas yield (SBY) compared to FW reactors fed with agricultural residue. Hence, both agricultural and industrial waste were efficacious when it came to boosting either FW anaerobic performance or AD effluent quality. Although each co-substrate performed under specific experimental conditions, this feature provides decision makers with diverse alternatives to implement a sustainable organic waste management system, conveying sufficient technical details to draw up appropriate designs for the recovery of various types of organic residue. MDPI 2021-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8535009/ /pubmed/34681402 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10102353 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Chaher, Nour El Houda Nassour, Abdallah Hamdi, Moktar Nelles, Michael Monitoring of Food Waste Anaerobic Digestion Performance: Conventional Co-Substrates vs. Unmarketable Biochar Additions |
title | Monitoring of Food Waste Anaerobic Digestion Performance: Conventional Co-Substrates vs. Unmarketable Biochar Additions |
title_full | Monitoring of Food Waste Anaerobic Digestion Performance: Conventional Co-Substrates vs. Unmarketable Biochar Additions |
title_fullStr | Monitoring of Food Waste Anaerobic Digestion Performance: Conventional Co-Substrates vs. Unmarketable Biochar Additions |
title_full_unstemmed | Monitoring of Food Waste Anaerobic Digestion Performance: Conventional Co-Substrates vs. Unmarketable Biochar Additions |
title_short | Monitoring of Food Waste Anaerobic Digestion Performance: Conventional Co-Substrates vs. Unmarketable Biochar Additions |
title_sort | monitoring of food waste anaerobic digestion performance: conventional co-substrates vs. unmarketable biochar additions |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8535009/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34681402 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10102353 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chahernourelhouda monitoringoffoodwasteanaerobicdigestionperformanceconventionalcosubstratesvsunmarketablebiocharadditions AT nassourabdallah monitoringoffoodwasteanaerobicdigestionperformanceconventionalcosubstratesvsunmarketablebiocharadditions AT hamdimoktar monitoringoffoodwasteanaerobicdigestionperformanceconventionalcosubstratesvsunmarketablebiocharadditions AT nellesmichael monitoringoffoodwasteanaerobicdigestionperformanceconventionalcosubstratesvsunmarketablebiocharadditions |