Cargando…

Monitoring of Food Waste Anaerobic Digestion Performance: Conventional Co-Substrates vs. Unmarketable Biochar Additions

This study proposed the selection of cost-effective additives generated from different activity sectors to enhance and stabilize the start-up, as well as the transitional phases, of semi-continuous food waste (FW) anaerobic digestion. The results showed that combining agricultural waste mixtures inc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chaher, Nour El Houda, Nassour, Abdallah, Hamdi, Moktar, Nelles, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8535009/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34681402
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10102353
_version_ 1784587674190872576
author Chaher, Nour El Houda
Nassour, Abdallah
Hamdi, Moktar
Nelles, Michael
author_facet Chaher, Nour El Houda
Nassour, Abdallah
Hamdi, Moktar
Nelles, Michael
author_sort Chaher, Nour El Houda
collection PubMed
description This study proposed the selection of cost-effective additives generated from different activity sectors to enhance and stabilize the start-up, as well as the transitional phases, of semi-continuous food waste (FW) anaerobic digestion. The results showed that combining agricultural waste mixtures including wheat straw (WS) and cattle manure (CM) boosted the process performance and generated up to 95% higher methane yield compared to the control reactors (mono-digested FW) under an organic loading rate (OLR) range of 2 to 3 kg VS/m(3)·d. Whereas R3 amended with unmarketable biochar (UBc), to around 10% of the initial fresh mass inserted, showed a significant process enhancement during the transitional phase, and more particularly at an OLR of 4 kg VS/m(3)·d, it was revealed that under these experimental conditions, FW reactors including UBc showed an increase of 144% in terms of specific biogas yield (SBY) compared to FW reactors fed with agricultural residue. Hence, both agricultural and industrial waste were efficacious when it came to boosting either FW anaerobic performance or AD effluent quality. Although each co-substrate performed under specific experimental conditions, this feature provides decision makers with diverse alternatives to implement a sustainable organic waste management system, conveying sufficient technical details to draw up appropriate designs for the recovery of various types of organic residue.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8535009
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85350092021-10-23 Monitoring of Food Waste Anaerobic Digestion Performance: Conventional Co-Substrates vs. Unmarketable Biochar Additions Chaher, Nour El Houda Nassour, Abdallah Hamdi, Moktar Nelles, Michael Foods Article This study proposed the selection of cost-effective additives generated from different activity sectors to enhance and stabilize the start-up, as well as the transitional phases, of semi-continuous food waste (FW) anaerobic digestion. The results showed that combining agricultural waste mixtures including wheat straw (WS) and cattle manure (CM) boosted the process performance and generated up to 95% higher methane yield compared to the control reactors (mono-digested FW) under an organic loading rate (OLR) range of 2 to 3 kg VS/m(3)·d. Whereas R3 amended with unmarketable biochar (UBc), to around 10% of the initial fresh mass inserted, showed a significant process enhancement during the transitional phase, and more particularly at an OLR of 4 kg VS/m(3)·d, it was revealed that under these experimental conditions, FW reactors including UBc showed an increase of 144% in terms of specific biogas yield (SBY) compared to FW reactors fed with agricultural residue. Hence, both agricultural and industrial waste were efficacious when it came to boosting either FW anaerobic performance or AD effluent quality. Although each co-substrate performed under specific experimental conditions, this feature provides decision makers with diverse alternatives to implement a sustainable organic waste management system, conveying sufficient technical details to draw up appropriate designs for the recovery of various types of organic residue. MDPI 2021-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8535009/ /pubmed/34681402 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10102353 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Chaher, Nour El Houda
Nassour, Abdallah
Hamdi, Moktar
Nelles, Michael
Monitoring of Food Waste Anaerobic Digestion Performance: Conventional Co-Substrates vs. Unmarketable Biochar Additions
title Monitoring of Food Waste Anaerobic Digestion Performance: Conventional Co-Substrates vs. Unmarketable Biochar Additions
title_full Monitoring of Food Waste Anaerobic Digestion Performance: Conventional Co-Substrates vs. Unmarketable Biochar Additions
title_fullStr Monitoring of Food Waste Anaerobic Digestion Performance: Conventional Co-Substrates vs. Unmarketable Biochar Additions
title_full_unstemmed Monitoring of Food Waste Anaerobic Digestion Performance: Conventional Co-Substrates vs. Unmarketable Biochar Additions
title_short Monitoring of Food Waste Anaerobic Digestion Performance: Conventional Co-Substrates vs. Unmarketable Biochar Additions
title_sort monitoring of food waste anaerobic digestion performance: conventional co-substrates vs. unmarketable biochar additions
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8535009/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34681402
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10102353
work_keys_str_mv AT chahernourelhouda monitoringoffoodwasteanaerobicdigestionperformanceconventionalcosubstratesvsunmarketablebiocharadditions
AT nassourabdallah monitoringoffoodwasteanaerobicdigestionperformanceconventionalcosubstratesvsunmarketablebiocharadditions
AT hamdimoktar monitoringoffoodwasteanaerobicdigestionperformanceconventionalcosubstratesvsunmarketablebiocharadditions
AT nellesmichael monitoringoffoodwasteanaerobicdigestionperformanceconventionalcosubstratesvsunmarketablebiocharadditions