Cargando…

A Systematic Review on Caries Status of Older Adults

The aim of this systematic review was to provide an update on caries prevalence in older adults aged 60 years or above around the globe. Two independent reviewers performed a systematic literature search of English publications from January 2016 to December 2020 using Pubmed, Scopus, Embase/Ovid and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chan, Alice Kit Ying, Tamrakar, Manisha, Jiang, Chloe Meng, Lo, Edward Chin Man, Leung, Katherine Chiu Man, Chu, Chun Hung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8535396/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34682414
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182010662
_version_ 1784587773685006336
author Chan, Alice Kit Ying
Tamrakar, Manisha
Jiang, Chloe Meng
Lo, Edward Chin Man
Leung, Katherine Chiu Man
Chu, Chun Hung
author_facet Chan, Alice Kit Ying
Tamrakar, Manisha
Jiang, Chloe Meng
Lo, Edward Chin Man
Leung, Katherine Chiu Man
Chu, Chun Hung
author_sort Chan, Alice Kit Ying
collection PubMed
description The aim of this systematic review was to provide an update on caries prevalence in older adults aged 60 years or above around the globe. Two independent reviewers performed a systematic literature search of English publications from January 2016 to December 2020 using Pubmed, Scopus, Embase/Ovid and Web of Science. The MeSH terms used were “dental caries”, “root caries”, “DMF index”, “aged” and “aged 80 and over”. Further searches in Google Scholar retrieved eight additional publications. The epidemiological surveys reporting the prevalence of dental caries or root caries or caries experience using DMFT (decayed, missing and filled teeth) and DFR (decayed and filled root) in older adults aged 60 years or above were included. Quality of the publications was assessed using the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Studies Reporting Prevalence Data. Among the 5271 identified publications, 39 articles of moderate or good quality were included. Twenty studies were conducted in Asia (China, India, Vietnam, Singapore and Turkey), ten in Europe (Ireland, Norway, Finland, Germany, Portugal, Poland, Romania and Kosovo), three in North America (USA and Mexico), one in South America (Brazil), two in Oceania (Australia) and three in Africa (Malawi, Egypt and South Africa). The prevalence of dental caries ranged from 25% (Australia) to 99% (South Africa), while the prevalence of root caries ranged from 8% (Finland) to 74% (Brazil) in community dwellers. The situation was even worse in institutionalised older adults of which the mean DMFT score varied from 6.9 (Malawi) to 29.7 (South Africa). Based on the included studies published in the last 5 years, caries is still prevalent in older adults worldwide and their prevalence varies across countries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8535396
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85353962021-10-23 A Systematic Review on Caries Status of Older Adults Chan, Alice Kit Ying Tamrakar, Manisha Jiang, Chloe Meng Lo, Edward Chin Man Leung, Katherine Chiu Man Chu, Chun Hung Int J Environ Res Public Health Review The aim of this systematic review was to provide an update on caries prevalence in older adults aged 60 years or above around the globe. Two independent reviewers performed a systematic literature search of English publications from January 2016 to December 2020 using Pubmed, Scopus, Embase/Ovid and Web of Science. The MeSH terms used were “dental caries”, “root caries”, “DMF index”, “aged” and “aged 80 and over”. Further searches in Google Scholar retrieved eight additional publications. The epidemiological surveys reporting the prevalence of dental caries or root caries or caries experience using DMFT (decayed, missing and filled teeth) and DFR (decayed and filled root) in older adults aged 60 years or above were included. Quality of the publications was assessed using the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Studies Reporting Prevalence Data. Among the 5271 identified publications, 39 articles of moderate or good quality were included. Twenty studies were conducted in Asia (China, India, Vietnam, Singapore and Turkey), ten in Europe (Ireland, Norway, Finland, Germany, Portugal, Poland, Romania and Kosovo), three in North America (USA and Mexico), one in South America (Brazil), two in Oceania (Australia) and three in Africa (Malawi, Egypt and South Africa). The prevalence of dental caries ranged from 25% (Australia) to 99% (South Africa), while the prevalence of root caries ranged from 8% (Finland) to 74% (Brazil) in community dwellers. The situation was even worse in institutionalised older adults of which the mean DMFT score varied from 6.9 (Malawi) to 29.7 (South Africa). Based on the included studies published in the last 5 years, caries is still prevalent in older adults worldwide and their prevalence varies across countries. MDPI 2021-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8535396/ /pubmed/34682414 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182010662 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Chan, Alice Kit Ying
Tamrakar, Manisha
Jiang, Chloe Meng
Lo, Edward Chin Man
Leung, Katherine Chiu Man
Chu, Chun Hung
A Systematic Review on Caries Status of Older Adults
title A Systematic Review on Caries Status of Older Adults
title_full A Systematic Review on Caries Status of Older Adults
title_fullStr A Systematic Review on Caries Status of Older Adults
title_full_unstemmed A Systematic Review on Caries Status of Older Adults
title_short A Systematic Review on Caries Status of Older Adults
title_sort systematic review on caries status of older adults
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8535396/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34682414
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182010662
work_keys_str_mv AT chanalicekitying asystematicreviewoncariesstatusofolderadults
AT tamrakarmanisha asystematicreviewoncariesstatusofolderadults
AT jiangchloemeng asystematicreviewoncariesstatusofolderadults
AT loedwardchinman asystematicreviewoncariesstatusofolderadults
AT leungkatherinechiuman asystematicreviewoncariesstatusofolderadults
AT chuchunhung asystematicreviewoncariesstatusofolderadults
AT chanalicekitying systematicreviewoncariesstatusofolderadults
AT tamrakarmanisha systematicreviewoncariesstatusofolderadults
AT jiangchloemeng systematicreviewoncariesstatusofolderadults
AT loedwardchinman systematicreviewoncariesstatusofolderadults
AT leungkatherinechiuman systematicreviewoncariesstatusofolderadults
AT chuchunhung systematicreviewoncariesstatusofolderadults