Cargando…

Rearward-Facing Infant Child Restraint Systems with Support Legs in Frontal and Frontal-Oblique Impacts

Previous studies of support legs in rearward-facing infant CRS models have focused on frontal impacts and have found that the presence of a support leg is associated with a reduction in head injury metrics. However, real-world crashes often involve an oblique principal direction of force. The curren...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patton, Declan A., Belwadi, Aditya N., Maheshwari, Jalaj, Arbogast, Kristy B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8535498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34682543
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182010799
_version_ 1784587798753312768
author Patton, Declan A.
Belwadi, Aditya N.
Maheshwari, Jalaj
Arbogast, Kristy B.
author_facet Patton, Declan A.
Belwadi, Aditya N.
Maheshwari, Jalaj
Arbogast, Kristy B.
author_sort Patton, Declan A.
collection PubMed
description Previous studies of support legs in rearward-facing infant CRS models have focused on frontal impacts and have found that the presence of a support leg is associated with a reduction in head injury metrics. However, real-world crashes often involve an oblique principal direction of force. The current study used sled tests to evaluate the effectiveness of support legs in rearward-facing infant CRS models for frontal and frontal-oblique impacts with and without a simulated front row seatback. Frontal and frontal-oblique impact sled tests were conducted using the simulated Consumer Reports test method with and without the blocker plate, which was developed to represent a front row seatback. The Q1.5 anthropomorphic test device (ATD) was seated in rearward-facing infant CRS models, which were tested with and without support legs. The presence of a support leg was associated with significant reductions of head injury metrics below injury tolerance limits for all tests, which supports the findings of previous studies. The presence of a support leg was also associated with significant reductions of peak neck tensile force. The presence of the blocker plate resulted in greater head injury metrics compared to tests without the blocker plate, but the result was non-significant. However, the fidelity of the interaction between the CRS and blocker plate as an adequate representation of the interaction that would occur in a real vehicle is not well understood. The findings from the current study continue to support the benefit of support legs in managing the energy of impact for a child in a rearward-facing CRS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8535498
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85354982021-10-23 Rearward-Facing Infant Child Restraint Systems with Support Legs in Frontal and Frontal-Oblique Impacts Patton, Declan A. Belwadi, Aditya N. Maheshwari, Jalaj Arbogast, Kristy B. Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Previous studies of support legs in rearward-facing infant CRS models have focused on frontal impacts and have found that the presence of a support leg is associated with a reduction in head injury metrics. However, real-world crashes often involve an oblique principal direction of force. The current study used sled tests to evaluate the effectiveness of support legs in rearward-facing infant CRS models for frontal and frontal-oblique impacts with and without a simulated front row seatback. Frontal and frontal-oblique impact sled tests were conducted using the simulated Consumer Reports test method with and without the blocker plate, which was developed to represent a front row seatback. The Q1.5 anthropomorphic test device (ATD) was seated in rearward-facing infant CRS models, which were tested with and without support legs. The presence of a support leg was associated with significant reductions of head injury metrics below injury tolerance limits for all tests, which supports the findings of previous studies. The presence of a support leg was also associated with significant reductions of peak neck tensile force. The presence of the blocker plate resulted in greater head injury metrics compared to tests without the blocker plate, but the result was non-significant. However, the fidelity of the interaction between the CRS and blocker plate as an adequate representation of the interaction that would occur in a real vehicle is not well understood. The findings from the current study continue to support the benefit of support legs in managing the energy of impact for a child in a rearward-facing CRS. MDPI 2021-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8535498/ /pubmed/34682543 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182010799 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Patton, Declan A.
Belwadi, Aditya N.
Maheshwari, Jalaj
Arbogast, Kristy B.
Rearward-Facing Infant Child Restraint Systems with Support Legs in Frontal and Frontal-Oblique Impacts
title Rearward-Facing Infant Child Restraint Systems with Support Legs in Frontal and Frontal-Oblique Impacts
title_full Rearward-Facing Infant Child Restraint Systems with Support Legs in Frontal and Frontal-Oblique Impacts
title_fullStr Rearward-Facing Infant Child Restraint Systems with Support Legs in Frontal and Frontal-Oblique Impacts
title_full_unstemmed Rearward-Facing Infant Child Restraint Systems with Support Legs in Frontal and Frontal-Oblique Impacts
title_short Rearward-Facing Infant Child Restraint Systems with Support Legs in Frontal and Frontal-Oblique Impacts
title_sort rearward-facing infant child restraint systems with support legs in frontal and frontal-oblique impacts
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8535498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34682543
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182010799
work_keys_str_mv AT pattondeclana rearwardfacinginfantchildrestraintsystemswithsupportlegsinfrontalandfrontalobliqueimpacts
AT belwadiadityan rearwardfacinginfantchildrestraintsystemswithsupportlegsinfrontalandfrontalobliqueimpacts
AT maheshwarijalaj rearwardfacinginfantchildrestraintsystemswithsupportlegsinfrontalandfrontalobliqueimpacts
AT arbogastkristyb rearwardfacinginfantchildrestraintsystemswithsupportlegsinfrontalandfrontalobliqueimpacts