Cargando…
Indoor Dining and In-Person Learning: A Comparison of 30 US Cities
With limited US federal leadership on closing and re-opening strategies to mitigate the COVID-19 pandemic, cities and states were left to enact their own policies. This article examines two key sets of policies—in-person learning in public elementary schools and indoor dining—across 30 of the larges...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8535569/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34682712 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182010967 |
_version_ | 1784587816118779904 |
---|---|
author | O’Leary, Gabriella Schnake-Mahl, Alina S. Vaidya, Vaishnavi Bilal, Usama Kolker, Jennifer |
author_facet | O’Leary, Gabriella Schnake-Mahl, Alina S. Vaidya, Vaishnavi Bilal, Usama Kolker, Jennifer |
author_sort | O’Leary, Gabriella |
collection | PubMed |
description | With limited US federal leadership on closing and re-opening strategies to mitigate the COVID-19 pandemic, cities and states were left to enact their own policies. This article examines two key sets of policies—in-person learning in public elementary schools and indoor dining—across 30 of the largest US cities in the summer, fall, and winter of 2020. We review indoor dining and in-person elementary education policy decisions between 1 May 2020 and 14 December 2020 across 30 US cities. We review the public health evidence, political power, and jurisdictional challenges that cities faced, and the policy implications of these factors. Overwhelmingly, indoor dining re-opened in cities while in-person elementary schools were kept closed; indoor dining re-opened in all cities in fall 2020, while only 40% of public elementary schools re-opened for in-person instruction. Looking ahead to fully bringing students back for in-person learning, and considering future potential community outbreaks, this retrospective analysis can help inform city and state governments on policy decisions around indoor dining and reopening/closing schools for in-person learning. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8535569 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85355692021-10-23 Indoor Dining and In-Person Learning: A Comparison of 30 US Cities O’Leary, Gabriella Schnake-Mahl, Alina S. Vaidya, Vaishnavi Bilal, Usama Kolker, Jennifer Int J Environ Res Public Health Article With limited US federal leadership on closing and re-opening strategies to mitigate the COVID-19 pandemic, cities and states were left to enact their own policies. This article examines two key sets of policies—in-person learning in public elementary schools and indoor dining—across 30 of the largest US cities in the summer, fall, and winter of 2020. We review indoor dining and in-person elementary education policy decisions between 1 May 2020 and 14 December 2020 across 30 US cities. We review the public health evidence, political power, and jurisdictional challenges that cities faced, and the policy implications of these factors. Overwhelmingly, indoor dining re-opened in cities while in-person elementary schools were kept closed; indoor dining re-opened in all cities in fall 2020, while only 40% of public elementary schools re-opened for in-person instruction. Looking ahead to fully bringing students back for in-person learning, and considering future potential community outbreaks, this retrospective analysis can help inform city and state governments on policy decisions around indoor dining and reopening/closing schools for in-person learning. MDPI 2021-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8535569/ /pubmed/34682712 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182010967 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article O’Leary, Gabriella Schnake-Mahl, Alina S. Vaidya, Vaishnavi Bilal, Usama Kolker, Jennifer Indoor Dining and In-Person Learning: A Comparison of 30 US Cities |
title | Indoor Dining and In-Person Learning: A Comparison of 30 US Cities |
title_full | Indoor Dining and In-Person Learning: A Comparison of 30 US Cities |
title_fullStr | Indoor Dining and In-Person Learning: A Comparison of 30 US Cities |
title_full_unstemmed | Indoor Dining and In-Person Learning: A Comparison of 30 US Cities |
title_short | Indoor Dining and In-Person Learning: A Comparison of 30 US Cities |
title_sort | indoor dining and in-person learning: a comparison of 30 us cities |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8535569/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34682712 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182010967 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT olearygabriella indoordiningandinpersonlearningacomparisonof30uscities AT schnakemahlalinas indoordiningandinpersonlearningacomparisonof30uscities AT vaidyavaishnavi indoordiningandinpersonlearningacomparisonof30uscities AT bilalusama indoordiningandinpersonlearningacomparisonof30uscities AT kolkerjennifer indoordiningandinpersonlearningacomparisonof30uscities |