Cargando…

Effect of Opposite Tooth Condition on Marginal Bone Loss around Submerged Dental Implants: A Retrospective Study with a 3-Year Follow-Up

Background: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of opposite tooth conditions on change in marginal bone level (MBL) around submerged dental implants. Materials and methods: The study included healthy patients with one or two implants. Structures opposite implants were either natu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dorj, Odontuya, Lin, Hsi-Kuei, Salamanca, Eisner, Pan, Yu-Hwa, Wu, Yi-Fan, Hsu, Yung-Szu, Lin, Jerry C-Y, Lin, Chin-Kai, Chang, Wei-Jen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8535684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34682460
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182010715
_version_ 1784587844095836160
author Dorj, Odontuya
Lin, Hsi-Kuei
Salamanca, Eisner
Pan, Yu-Hwa
Wu, Yi-Fan
Hsu, Yung-Szu
Lin, Jerry C-Y
Lin, Chin-Kai
Chang, Wei-Jen
author_facet Dorj, Odontuya
Lin, Hsi-Kuei
Salamanca, Eisner
Pan, Yu-Hwa
Wu, Yi-Fan
Hsu, Yung-Szu
Lin, Jerry C-Y
Lin, Chin-Kai
Chang, Wei-Jen
author_sort Dorj, Odontuya
collection PubMed
description Background: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of opposite tooth conditions on change in marginal bone level (MBL) around submerged dental implants. Materials and methods: The study included healthy patients with one or two implants. Structures opposite implants were either natural teeth (NT) or fixed restorations (FRs). MBLs were measured on digital periapical radiographs at the mesial and distal aspects of each implant. Results: Sixty implants were inserted by the 3-year follow-up. Mean MBLs for NT were 0.21 ± 0.33 mm before prosthetic loading and 0.30 ± 0.41 mm 3 years later (p = 0.001). Mean MBLs with FRs were 0.36 ± 0.45 mm before loading and 0.53 ± 0.50 mm 3 years later (p < 0.001). Changes in mean MBL from the 6-month follow-up to the 1- and 3-year follow-ups were statistically significant (p < 0.01) for implants opposite NT. However, changes in mean MBL from the 6-month follow-up to the 1-year (p = 0.161) and 3-year follow-ups (p = 1.000) were not significant for implants opposite FRs. Between baseline and the 3-year follow-up, MBL change was relatively small and did not differ regarding NT and FRs. Conclusion: Bone loss was greater if submerged dental implants were opposed by FRs. MBLs around submerged implants continued to change after 3 years if NT opposed implants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8535684
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85356842021-10-23 Effect of Opposite Tooth Condition on Marginal Bone Loss around Submerged Dental Implants: A Retrospective Study with a 3-Year Follow-Up Dorj, Odontuya Lin, Hsi-Kuei Salamanca, Eisner Pan, Yu-Hwa Wu, Yi-Fan Hsu, Yung-Szu Lin, Jerry C-Y Lin, Chin-Kai Chang, Wei-Jen Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Background: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of opposite tooth conditions on change in marginal bone level (MBL) around submerged dental implants. Materials and methods: The study included healthy patients with one or two implants. Structures opposite implants were either natural teeth (NT) or fixed restorations (FRs). MBLs were measured on digital periapical radiographs at the mesial and distal aspects of each implant. Results: Sixty implants were inserted by the 3-year follow-up. Mean MBLs for NT were 0.21 ± 0.33 mm before prosthetic loading and 0.30 ± 0.41 mm 3 years later (p = 0.001). Mean MBLs with FRs were 0.36 ± 0.45 mm before loading and 0.53 ± 0.50 mm 3 years later (p < 0.001). Changes in mean MBL from the 6-month follow-up to the 1- and 3-year follow-ups were statistically significant (p < 0.01) for implants opposite NT. However, changes in mean MBL from the 6-month follow-up to the 1-year (p = 0.161) and 3-year follow-ups (p = 1.000) were not significant for implants opposite FRs. Between baseline and the 3-year follow-up, MBL change was relatively small and did not differ regarding NT and FRs. Conclusion: Bone loss was greater if submerged dental implants were opposed by FRs. MBLs around submerged implants continued to change after 3 years if NT opposed implants. MDPI 2021-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8535684/ /pubmed/34682460 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182010715 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Dorj, Odontuya
Lin, Hsi-Kuei
Salamanca, Eisner
Pan, Yu-Hwa
Wu, Yi-Fan
Hsu, Yung-Szu
Lin, Jerry C-Y
Lin, Chin-Kai
Chang, Wei-Jen
Effect of Opposite Tooth Condition on Marginal Bone Loss around Submerged Dental Implants: A Retrospective Study with a 3-Year Follow-Up
title Effect of Opposite Tooth Condition on Marginal Bone Loss around Submerged Dental Implants: A Retrospective Study with a 3-Year Follow-Up
title_full Effect of Opposite Tooth Condition on Marginal Bone Loss around Submerged Dental Implants: A Retrospective Study with a 3-Year Follow-Up
title_fullStr Effect of Opposite Tooth Condition on Marginal Bone Loss around Submerged Dental Implants: A Retrospective Study with a 3-Year Follow-Up
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Opposite Tooth Condition on Marginal Bone Loss around Submerged Dental Implants: A Retrospective Study with a 3-Year Follow-Up
title_short Effect of Opposite Tooth Condition on Marginal Bone Loss around Submerged Dental Implants: A Retrospective Study with a 3-Year Follow-Up
title_sort effect of opposite tooth condition on marginal bone loss around submerged dental implants: a retrospective study with a 3-year follow-up
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8535684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34682460
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182010715
work_keys_str_mv AT dorjodontuya effectofoppositetoothconditiononmarginalbonelossaroundsubmergeddentalimplantsaretrospectivestudywitha3yearfollowup
AT linhsikuei effectofoppositetoothconditiononmarginalbonelossaroundsubmergeddentalimplantsaretrospectivestudywitha3yearfollowup
AT salamancaeisner effectofoppositetoothconditiononmarginalbonelossaroundsubmergeddentalimplantsaretrospectivestudywitha3yearfollowup
AT panyuhwa effectofoppositetoothconditiononmarginalbonelossaroundsubmergeddentalimplantsaretrospectivestudywitha3yearfollowup
AT wuyifan effectofoppositetoothconditiononmarginalbonelossaroundsubmergeddentalimplantsaretrospectivestudywitha3yearfollowup
AT hsuyungszu effectofoppositetoothconditiononmarginalbonelossaroundsubmergeddentalimplantsaretrospectivestudywitha3yearfollowup
AT linjerrycy effectofoppositetoothconditiononmarginalbonelossaroundsubmergeddentalimplantsaretrospectivestudywitha3yearfollowup
AT linchinkai effectofoppositetoothconditiononmarginalbonelossaroundsubmergeddentalimplantsaretrospectivestudywitha3yearfollowup
AT changweijen effectofoppositetoothconditiononmarginalbonelossaroundsubmergeddentalimplantsaretrospectivestudywitha3yearfollowup