Cargando…

Immunohistochemical Evaluation of Periodontal Regeneration Using a Porous Collagen Scaffold

(1) Aim: To immunohistochemically evaluate the effect of a volume-stable collagen scaffold (VCMX) on periodontal regeneration. (2) Methods: In eight beagle dogs, acute two-wall intrabony defects were treated with open flap debridement either with VCMX (test) or without (control). After 12 weeks, eig...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Imber, Jean-Claude, Roccuzzo, Andrea, Stähli, Alexandra, Saulacic, Nikola, Deschner, James, Sculean, Anton, Bosshardt, Dieter Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8535773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34681574
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms222010915
_version_ 1784587864813600768
author Imber, Jean-Claude
Roccuzzo, Andrea
Stähli, Alexandra
Saulacic, Nikola
Deschner, James
Sculean, Anton
Bosshardt, Dieter Daniel
author_facet Imber, Jean-Claude
Roccuzzo, Andrea
Stähli, Alexandra
Saulacic, Nikola
Deschner, James
Sculean, Anton
Bosshardt, Dieter Daniel
author_sort Imber, Jean-Claude
collection PubMed
description (1) Aim: To immunohistochemically evaluate the effect of a volume-stable collagen scaffold (VCMX) on periodontal regeneration. (2) Methods: In eight beagle dogs, acute two-wall intrabony defects were treated with open flap debridement either with VCMX (test) or without (control). After 12 weeks, eight defects out of four animals were processed for paraffin histology and immunohistochemistry. (3) Results: All defects (four test + four control) revealed periodontal regeneration with cementum and bone formation. VCMX remnants were integrated in bone, periodontal ligament (PDL), and cementum. No differences in immunohistochemical labeling patterns were observed between test and control sites. New bone and cementum were labeled for bone sialoprotein, while the regenerated PDL was labeled for periostin and collagen type 1. Cytokeratin-positive epithelial cell rests of Malassez were detected in 50% of the defects. The regenerated PDL demonstrated a larger blood vessel area at the test (14.48% ± 3.52%) than at control sites (8.04% ± 1.85%, p = 0.0007). The number of blood vessels was higher in the regenerated PDL (test + control) compared to the pristine one (p = 0.012). The cell proliferative index was not statistically significantly different in pristine and regenerated PDL. (4) Conclusions: The data suggest a positive effect of VCMX on angiogenesis and an equally high cell turnover in the regenerated and pristine PDL. This VCMX supported periodontal regeneration in intrabony defects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8535773
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85357732021-10-23 Immunohistochemical Evaluation of Periodontal Regeneration Using a Porous Collagen Scaffold Imber, Jean-Claude Roccuzzo, Andrea Stähli, Alexandra Saulacic, Nikola Deschner, James Sculean, Anton Bosshardt, Dieter Daniel Int J Mol Sci Article (1) Aim: To immunohistochemically evaluate the effect of a volume-stable collagen scaffold (VCMX) on periodontal regeneration. (2) Methods: In eight beagle dogs, acute two-wall intrabony defects were treated with open flap debridement either with VCMX (test) or without (control). After 12 weeks, eight defects out of four animals were processed for paraffin histology and immunohistochemistry. (3) Results: All defects (four test + four control) revealed periodontal regeneration with cementum and bone formation. VCMX remnants were integrated in bone, periodontal ligament (PDL), and cementum. No differences in immunohistochemical labeling patterns were observed between test and control sites. New bone and cementum were labeled for bone sialoprotein, while the regenerated PDL was labeled for periostin and collagen type 1. Cytokeratin-positive epithelial cell rests of Malassez were detected in 50% of the defects. The regenerated PDL demonstrated a larger blood vessel area at the test (14.48% ± 3.52%) than at control sites (8.04% ± 1.85%, p = 0.0007). The number of blood vessels was higher in the regenerated PDL (test + control) compared to the pristine one (p = 0.012). The cell proliferative index was not statistically significantly different in pristine and regenerated PDL. (4) Conclusions: The data suggest a positive effect of VCMX on angiogenesis and an equally high cell turnover in the regenerated and pristine PDL. This VCMX supported periodontal regeneration in intrabony defects. MDPI 2021-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8535773/ /pubmed/34681574 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms222010915 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Imber, Jean-Claude
Roccuzzo, Andrea
Stähli, Alexandra
Saulacic, Nikola
Deschner, James
Sculean, Anton
Bosshardt, Dieter Daniel
Immunohistochemical Evaluation of Periodontal Regeneration Using a Porous Collagen Scaffold
title Immunohistochemical Evaluation of Periodontal Regeneration Using a Porous Collagen Scaffold
title_full Immunohistochemical Evaluation of Periodontal Regeneration Using a Porous Collagen Scaffold
title_fullStr Immunohistochemical Evaluation of Periodontal Regeneration Using a Porous Collagen Scaffold
title_full_unstemmed Immunohistochemical Evaluation of Periodontal Regeneration Using a Porous Collagen Scaffold
title_short Immunohistochemical Evaluation of Periodontal Regeneration Using a Porous Collagen Scaffold
title_sort immunohistochemical evaluation of periodontal regeneration using a porous collagen scaffold
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8535773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34681574
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms222010915
work_keys_str_mv AT imberjeanclaude immunohistochemicalevaluationofperiodontalregenerationusingaporouscollagenscaffold
AT roccuzzoandrea immunohistochemicalevaluationofperiodontalregenerationusingaporouscollagenscaffold
AT stahlialexandra immunohistochemicalevaluationofperiodontalregenerationusingaporouscollagenscaffold
AT saulacicnikola immunohistochemicalevaluationofperiodontalregenerationusingaporouscollagenscaffold
AT deschnerjames immunohistochemicalevaluationofperiodontalregenerationusingaporouscollagenscaffold
AT sculeananton immunohistochemicalevaluationofperiodontalregenerationusingaporouscollagenscaffold
AT bosshardtdieterdaniel immunohistochemicalevaluationofperiodontalregenerationusingaporouscollagenscaffold