Cargando…
Comparing HIV Post-Exposure Prophylaxis, Testing, and New Diagnoses in Two Australian Cities with Different Lockdown Measures during the COVID-19 Pandemic
Australia introduced a national lockdown on 22 March 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Melbourne, but not Sydney, had a second COVID-19 lockdown between July and October 2020. We compared the number of HIV post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) prescriptions, HIV tests, and new HIV diagnoses durin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8535787/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34682556 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182010814 |
_version_ | 1784587867954085888 |
---|---|
author | Chow, Eric P. F. Ong, Jason J. Donovan, Basil Foster, Rosalind Phillips, Tiffany R. McNulty, Anna Fairley, Christopher K. |
author_facet | Chow, Eric P. F. Ong, Jason J. Donovan, Basil Foster, Rosalind Phillips, Tiffany R. McNulty, Anna Fairley, Christopher K. |
author_sort | Chow, Eric P. F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Australia introduced a national lockdown on 22 March 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Melbourne, but not Sydney, had a second COVID-19 lockdown between July and October 2020. We compared the number of HIV post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) prescriptions, HIV tests, and new HIV diagnoses during these lockdown periods. The three outcomes in 2020 were compared to 2019 using incidence rate ratio. There was a 37% and 46% reduction in PEP prescriptions in Melbourne and Sydney, respectively, with a larger reduction during lockdown (68% and 57% reductions in Melbourne’s first and second lockdown, 60% reduction in Sydney’s lockdown). There was a 41% and 32% reduction in HIV tests in Melbourne and Sydney, respectively, with a larger reduction during lockdown (57% and 61% reductions in Melbourne’s first and second lockdowns, 58% reduction in Sydney’s lockdown). There was a 44% and 47% reduction in new HIV diagnoses in Melbourne and Sydney, respectively, but no significant reductions during lockdown. The reduction in PEP prescriptions, HIV tests, and new HIV diagnoses during the lockdown periods could be due to the reduction in the number of sexual partners during that period. It could also result in more HIV transmission due to substantial reductions in HIV prevention measures during COVID-19 lockdowns. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8535787 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85357872021-10-23 Comparing HIV Post-Exposure Prophylaxis, Testing, and New Diagnoses in Two Australian Cities with Different Lockdown Measures during the COVID-19 Pandemic Chow, Eric P. F. Ong, Jason J. Donovan, Basil Foster, Rosalind Phillips, Tiffany R. McNulty, Anna Fairley, Christopher K. Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Australia introduced a national lockdown on 22 March 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Melbourne, but not Sydney, had a second COVID-19 lockdown between July and October 2020. We compared the number of HIV post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) prescriptions, HIV tests, and new HIV diagnoses during these lockdown periods. The three outcomes in 2020 were compared to 2019 using incidence rate ratio. There was a 37% and 46% reduction in PEP prescriptions in Melbourne and Sydney, respectively, with a larger reduction during lockdown (68% and 57% reductions in Melbourne’s first and second lockdown, 60% reduction in Sydney’s lockdown). There was a 41% and 32% reduction in HIV tests in Melbourne and Sydney, respectively, with a larger reduction during lockdown (57% and 61% reductions in Melbourne’s first and second lockdowns, 58% reduction in Sydney’s lockdown). There was a 44% and 47% reduction in new HIV diagnoses in Melbourne and Sydney, respectively, but no significant reductions during lockdown. The reduction in PEP prescriptions, HIV tests, and new HIV diagnoses during the lockdown periods could be due to the reduction in the number of sexual partners during that period. It could also result in more HIV transmission due to substantial reductions in HIV prevention measures during COVID-19 lockdowns. MDPI 2021-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8535787/ /pubmed/34682556 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182010814 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Chow, Eric P. F. Ong, Jason J. Donovan, Basil Foster, Rosalind Phillips, Tiffany R. McNulty, Anna Fairley, Christopher K. Comparing HIV Post-Exposure Prophylaxis, Testing, and New Diagnoses in Two Australian Cities with Different Lockdown Measures during the COVID-19 Pandemic |
title | Comparing HIV Post-Exposure Prophylaxis, Testing, and New Diagnoses in Two Australian Cities with Different Lockdown Measures during the COVID-19 Pandemic |
title_full | Comparing HIV Post-Exposure Prophylaxis, Testing, and New Diagnoses in Two Australian Cities with Different Lockdown Measures during the COVID-19 Pandemic |
title_fullStr | Comparing HIV Post-Exposure Prophylaxis, Testing, and New Diagnoses in Two Australian Cities with Different Lockdown Measures during the COVID-19 Pandemic |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing HIV Post-Exposure Prophylaxis, Testing, and New Diagnoses in Two Australian Cities with Different Lockdown Measures during the COVID-19 Pandemic |
title_short | Comparing HIV Post-Exposure Prophylaxis, Testing, and New Diagnoses in Two Australian Cities with Different Lockdown Measures during the COVID-19 Pandemic |
title_sort | comparing hiv post-exposure prophylaxis, testing, and new diagnoses in two australian cities with different lockdown measures during the covid-19 pandemic |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8535787/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34682556 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182010814 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chowericpf comparinghivpostexposureprophylaxistestingandnewdiagnosesintwoaustraliancitieswithdifferentlockdownmeasuresduringthecovid19pandemic AT ongjasonj comparinghivpostexposureprophylaxistestingandnewdiagnosesintwoaustraliancitieswithdifferentlockdownmeasuresduringthecovid19pandemic AT donovanbasil comparinghivpostexposureprophylaxistestingandnewdiagnosesintwoaustraliancitieswithdifferentlockdownmeasuresduringthecovid19pandemic AT fosterrosalind comparinghivpostexposureprophylaxistestingandnewdiagnosesintwoaustraliancitieswithdifferentlockdownmeasuresduringthecovid19pandemic AT phillipstiffanyr comparinghivpostexposureprophylaxistestingandnewdiagnosesintwoaustraliancitieswithdifferentlockdownmeasuresduringthecovid19pandemic AT mcnultyanna comparinghivpostexposureprophylaxistestingandnewdiagnosesintwoaustraliancitieswithdifferentlockdownmeasuresduringthecovid19pandemic AT fairleychristopherk comparinghivpostexposureprophylaxistestingandnewdiagnosesintwoaustraliancitieswithdifferentlockdownmeasuresduringthecovid19pandemic |