Cargando…

Comparing HIV Post-Exposure Prophylaxis, Testing, and New Diagnoses in Two Australian Cities with Different Lockdown Measures during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Australia introduced a national lockdown on 22 March 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Melbourne, but not Sydney, had a second COVID-19 lockdown between July and October 2020. We compared the number of HIV post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) prescriptions, HIV tests, and new HIV diagnoses durin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chow, Eric P. F., Ong, Jason J., Donovan, Basil, Foster, Rosalind, Phillips, Tiffany R., McNulty, Anna, Fairley, Christopher K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8535787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34682556
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182010814
_version_ 1784587867954085888
author Chow, Eric P. F.
Ong, Jason J.
Donovan, Basil
Foster, Rosalind
Phillips, Tiffany R.
McNulty, Anna
Fairley, Christopher K.
author_facet Chow, Eric P. F.
Ong, Jason J.
Donovan, Basil
Foster, Rosalind
Phillips, Tiffany R.
McNulty, Anna
Fairley, Christopher K.
author_sort Chow, Eric P. F.
collection PubMed
description Australia introduced a national lockdown on 22 March 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Melbourne, but not Sydney, had a second COVID-19 lockdown between July and October 2020. We compared the number of HIV post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) prescriptions, HIV tests, and new HIV diagnoses during these lockdown periods. The three outcomes in 2020 were compared to 2019 using incidence rate ratio. There was a 37% and 46% reduction in PEP prescriptions in Melbourne and Sydney, respectively, with a larger reduction during lockdown (68% and 57% reductions in Melbourne’s first and second lockdown, 60% reduction in Sydney’s lockdown). There was a 41% and 32% reduction in HIV tests in Melbourne and Sydney, respectively, with a larger reduction during lockdown (57% and 61% reductions in Melbourne’s first and second lockdowns, 58% reduction in Sydney’s lockdown). There was a 44% and 47% reduction in new HIV diagnoses in Melbourne and Sydney, respectively, but no significant reductions during lockdown. The reduction in PEP prescriptions, HIV tests, and new HIV diagnoses during the lockdown periods could be due to the reduction in the number of sexual partners during that period. It could also result in more HIV transmission due to substantial reductions in HIV prevention measures during COVID-19 lockdowns.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8535787
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85357872021-10-23 Comparing HIV Post-Exposure Prophylaxis, Testing, and New Diagnoses in Two Australian Cities with Different Lockdown Measures during the COVID-19 Pandemic Chow, Eric P. F. Ong, Jason J. Donovan, Basil Foster, Rosalind Phillips, Tiffany R. McNulty, Anna Fairley, Christopher K. Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Australia introduced a national lockdown on 22 March 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Melbourne, but not Sydney, had a second COVID-19 lockdown between July and October 2020. We compared the number of HIV post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) prescriptions, HIV tests, and new HIV diagnoses during these lockdown periods. The three outcomes in 2020 were compared to 2019 using incidence rate ratio. There was a 37% and 46% reduction in PEP prescriptions in Melbourne and Sydney, respectively, with a larger reduction during lockdown (68% and 57% reductions in Melbourne’s first and second lockdown, 60% reduction in Sydney’s lockdown). There was a 41% and 32% reduction in HIV tests in Melbourne and Sydney, respectively, with a larger reduction during lockdown (57% and 61% reductions in Melbourne’s first and second lockdowns, 58% reduction in Sydney’s lockdown). There was a 44% and 47% reduction in new HIV diagnoses in Melbourne and Sydney, respectively, but no significant reductions during lockdown. The reduction in PEP prescriptions, HIV tests, and new HIV diagnoses during the lockdown periods could be due to the reduction in the number of sexual partners during that period. It could also result in more HIV transmission due to substantial reductions in HIV prevention measures during COVID-19 lockdowns. MDPI 2021-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8535787/ /pubmed/34682556 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182010814 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Chow, Eric P. F.
Ong, Jason J.
Donovan, Basil
Foster, Rosalind
Phillips, Tiffany R.
McNulty, Anna
Fairley, Christopher K.
Comparing HIV Post-Exposure Prophylaxis, Testing, and New Diagnoses in Two Australian Cities with Different Lockdown Measures during the COVID-19 Pandemic
title Comparing HIV Post-Exposure Prophylaxis, Testing, and New Diagnoses in Two Australian Cities with Different Lockdown Measures during the COVID-19 Pandemic
title_full Comparing HIV Post-Exposure Prophylaxis, Testing, and New Diagnoses in Two Australian Cities with Different Lockdown Measures during the COVID-19 Pandemic
title_fullStr Comparing HIV Post-Exposure Prophylaxis, Testing, and New Diagnoses in Two Australian Cities with Different Lockdown Measures during the COVID-19 Pandemic
title_full_unstemmed Comparing HIV Post-Exposure Prophylaxis, Testing, and New Diagnoses in Two Australian Cities with Different Lockdown Measures during the COVID-19 Pandemic
title_short Comparing HIV Post-Exposure Prophylaxis, Testing, and New Diagnoses in Two Australian Cities with Different Lockdown Measures during the COVID-19 Pandemic
title_sort comparing hiv post-exposure prophylaxis, testing, and new diagnoses in two australian cities with different lockdown measures during the covid-19 pandemic
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8535787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34682556
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182010814
work_keys_str_mv AT chowericpf comparinghivpostexposureprophylaxistestingandnewdiagnosesintwoaustraliancitieswithdifferentlockdownmeasuresduringthecovid19pandemic
AT ongjasonj comparinghivpostexposureprophylaxistestingandnewdiagnosesintwoaustraliancitieswithdifferentlockdownmeasuresduringthecovid19pandemic
AT donovanbasil comparinghivpostexposureprophylaxistestingandnewdiagnosesintwoaustraliancitieswithdifferentlockdownmeasuresduringthecovid19pandemic
AT fosterrosalind comparinghivpostexposureprophylaxistestingandnewdiagnosesintwoaustraliancitieswithdifferentlockdownmeasuresduringthecovid19pandemic
AT phillipstiffanyr comparinghivpostexposureprophylaxistestingandnewdiagnosesintwoaustraliancitieswithdifferentlockdownmeasuresduringthecovid19pandemic
AT mcnultyanna comparinghivpostexposureprophylaxistestingandnewdiagnosesintwoaustraliancitieswithdifferentlockdownmeasuresduringthecovid19pandemic
AT fairleychristopherk comparinghivpostexposureprophylaxistestingandnewdiagnosesintwoaustraliancitieswithdifferentlockdownmeasuresduringthecovid19pandemic