Cargando…
Cancer Therapy Guided by Mutation Tests: Current Status and Perspectives
The administration of many cancer drugs is tailored to genetic tests. Some genomic events, e.g., alterations of EGFR or BRAF oncogenes, result in the conformational change of the corresponding proteins and call for the use of mutation-specific compounds. Other genetic perturbations, e.g., HER2 ampli...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8536080/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34681592 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms222010931 |
_version_ | 1784587938521153536 |
---|---|
author | Aleksakhina, Svetlana N. Imyanitov, Evgeny N. |
author_facet | Aleksakhina, Svetlana N. Imyanitov, Evgeny N. |
author_sort | Aleksakhina, Svetlana N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The administration of many cancer drugs is tailored to genetic tests. Some genomic events, e.g., alterations of EGFR or BRAF oncogenes, result in the conformational change of the corresponding proteins and call for the use of mutation-specific compounds. Other genetic perturbations, e.g., HER2 amplifications, ALK translocations or MET exon 14 skipping mutations, cause overproduction of the entire protein or its kinase domain. There are multilocus assays that provide integrative characteristics of the tumor genome, such as the analysis of tumor mutation burden or deficiency of DNA repair. Treatment planning for non-small cell lung cancer requires testing for EGFR, ALK, ROS1, BRAF, MET, RET and KRAS gene alterations. Colorectal cancer patients need to undergo KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, HER2 and microsatellite instability analysis. The genomic examination of breast cancer includes testing for HER2 amplification and PIK3CA activation. Melanomas are currently subjected to BRAF and, in some instances, KIT genetic analysis. Predictive DNA assays have also been developed for thyroid cancers, cholangiocarcinomas and urinary bladder tumors. There is an increasing utilization of agnostic testing which involves the analysis of all potentially actionable genes across all tumor types. The invention of genomically tailored treatment has resulted in a spectacular improvement in disease outcomes for a significant portion of cancer patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8536080 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85360802021-10-23 Cancer Therapy Guided by Mutation Tests: Current Status and Perspectives Aleksakhina, Svetlana N. Imyanitov, Evgeny N. Int J Mol Sci Review The administration of many cancer drugs is tailored to genetic tests. Some genomic events, e.g., alterations of EGFR or BRAF oncogenes, result in the conformational change of the corresponding proteins and call for the use of mutation-specific compounds. Other genetic perturbations, e.g., HER2 amplifications, ALK translocations or MET exon 14 skipping mutations, cause overproduction of the entire protein or its kinase domain. There are multilocus assays that provide integrative characteristics of the tumor genome, such as the analysis of tumor mutation burden or deficiency of DNA repair. Treatment planning for non-small cell lung cancer requires testing for EGFR, ALK, ROS1, BRAF, MET, RET and KRAS gene alterations. Colorectal cancer patients need to undergo KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, HER2 and microsatellite instability analysis. The genomic examination of breast cancer includes testing for HER2 amplification and PIK3CA activation. Melanomas are currently subjected to BRAF and, in some instances, KIT genetic analysis. Predictive DNA assays have also been developed for thyroid cancers, cholangiocarcinomas and urinary bladder tumors. There is an increasing utilization of agnostic testing which involves the analysis of all potentially actionable genes across all tumor types. The invention of genomically tailored treatment has resulted in a spectacular improvement in disease outcomes for a significant portion of cancer patients. MDPI 2021-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8536080/ /pubmed/34681592 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms222010931 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Aleksakhina, Svetlana N. Imyanitov, Evgeny N. Cancer Therapy Guided by Mutation Tests: Current Status and Perspectives |
title | Cancer Therapy Guided by Mutation Tests: Current Status and Perspectives |
title_full | Cancer Therapy Guided by Mutation Tests: Current Status and Perspectives |
title_fullStr | Cancer Therapy Guided by Mutation Tests: Current Status and Perspectives |
title_full_unstemmed | Cancer Therapy Guided by Mutation Tests: Current Status and Perspectives |
title_short | Cancer Therapy Guided by Mutation Tests: Current Status and Perspectives |
title_sort | cancer therapy guided by mutation tests: current status and perspectives |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8536080/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34681592 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms222010931 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aleksakhinasvetlanan cancertherapyguidedbymutationtestscurrentstatusandperspectives AT imyanitovevgenyn cancertherapyguidedbymutationtestscurrentstatusandperspectives |