Cargando…

Measurement Invariance of the Sexual Orientation Microaggression Inventory across LGB Males and Females in Taiwan: Bifactor Structure Fits the Best

The present study examined the factor structure and concurrent validity of the traditional Chinese version of the Sexual Orientation Microaggression Inventory (SOMI) among lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) individuals in Taiwan. In total, 1000 self-identified LGB individuals completed the SOMI, HIV a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hsieh, Meng-Tsang, Chen, Jung-Sheng, Lin, Chung-Ying, Yen, Cheng-Fang, Griffiths, Mark D., Huang, Yu-Te
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8536138/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34682410
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182010668
_version_ 1784587951940829184
author Hsieh, Meng-Tsang
Chen, Jung-Sheng
Lin, Chung-Ying
Yen, Cheng-Fang
Griffiths, Mark D.
Huang, Yu-Te
author_facet Hsieh, Meng-Tsang
Chen, Jung-Sheng
Lin, Chung-Ying
Yen, Cheng-Fang
Griffiths, Mark D.
Huang, Yu-Te
author_sort Hsieh, Meng-Tsang
collection PubMed
description The present study examined the factor structure and concurrent validity of the traditional Chinese version of the Sexual Orientation Microaggression Inventory (SOMI) among lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) individuals in Taiwan. In total, 1000 self-identified LGB individuals completed the SOMI, HIV and Homosexuality Related Stigma Scale (HHRSS), and Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II (AAQ). Different factor structures (including one-factor, four-factor, bifactor, and higher-order factor structures) were evaluated using confirmatory factor analysis. The bifactor structure significantly outperformed all others on the SOMI. The bifactor structure with one general factor and four trait factors was found to be measurement invariant across biological sex with satisfactory fit indices. The SOMI general factor was significantly associated with HHRSS-Homosexuality score and AAQ score. The findings indicate that the SOMI is a psychometrically sound instrument for Taiwan sexual minority groups. More specifically, SOMI can be used to accurately assess microaggression among LGB individuals. The measure on microaggression may also provide insights for healthcare providers about LGB individuals’ sexuality-related stigma. Moreover, healthcare providers and relevant stakeholders can use the SOMI to understand how LGB individuals perceive and feel microaggression.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8536138
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85361382021-10-23 Measurement Invariance of the Sexual Orientation Microaggression Inventory across LGB Males and Females in Taiwan: Bifactor Structure Fits the Best Hsieh, Meng-Tsang Chen, Jung-Sheng Lin, Chung-Ying Yen, Cheng-Fang Griffiths, Mark D. Huang, Yu-Te Int J Environ Res Public Health Article The present study examined the factor structure and concurrent validity of the traditional Chinese version of the Sexual Orientation Microaggression Inventory (SOMI) among lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) individuals in Taiwan. In total, 1000 self-identified LGB individuals completed the SOMI, HIV and Homosexuality Related Stigma Scale (HHRSS), and Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II (AAQ). Different factor structures (including one-factor, four-factor, bifactor, and higher-order factor structures) were evaluated using confirmatory factor analysis. The bifactor structure significantly outperformed all others on the SOMI. The bifactor structure with one general factor and four trait factors was found to be measurement invariant across biological sex with satisfactory fit indices. The SOMI general factor was significantly associated with HHRSS-Homosexuality score and AAQ score. The findings indicate that the SOMI is a psychometrically sound instrument for Taiwan sexual minority groups. More specifically, SOMI can be used to accurately assess microaggression among LGB individuals. The measure on microaggression may also provide insights for healthcare providers about LGB individuals’ sexuality-related stigma. Moreover, healthcare providers and relevant stakeholders can use the SOMI to understand how LGB individuals perceive and feel microaggression. MDPI 2021-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8536138/ /pubmed/34682410 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182010668 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Hsieh, Meng-Tsang
Chen, Jung-Sheng
Lin, Chung-Ying
Yen, Cheng-Fang
Griffiths, Mark D.
Huang, Yu-Te
Measurement Invariance of the Sexual Orientation Microaggression Inventory across LGB Males and Females in Taiwan: Bifactor Structure Fits the Best
title Measurement Invariance of the Sexual Orientation Microaggression Inventory across LGB Males and Females in Taiwan: Bifactor Structure Fits the Best
title_full Measurement Invariance of the Sexual Orientation Microaggression Inventory across LGB Males and Females in Taiwan: Bifactor Structure Fits the Best
title_fullStr Measurement Invariance of the Sexual Orientation Microaggression Inventory across LGB Males and Females in Taiwan: Bifactor Structure Fits the Best
title_full_unstemmed Measurement Invariance of the Sexual Orientation Microaggression Inventory across LGB Males and Females in Taiwan: Bifactor Structure Fits the Best
title_short Measurement Invariance of the Sexual Orientation Microaggression Inventory across LGB Males and Females in Taiwan: Bifactor Structure Fits the Best
title_sort measurement invariance of the sexual orientation microaggression inventory across lgb males and females in taiwan: bifactor structure fits the best
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8536138/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34682410
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182010668
work_keys_str_mv AT hsiehmengtsang measurementinvarianceofthesexualorientationmicroaggressioninventoryacrosslgbmalesandfemalesintaiwanbifactorstructurefitsthebest
AT chenjungsheng measurementinvarianceofthesexualorientationmicroaggressioninventoryacrosslgbmalesandfemalesintaiwanbifactorstructurefitsthebest
AT linchungying measurementinvarianceofthesexualorientationmicroaggressioninventoryacrosslgbmalesandfemalesintaiwanbifactorstructurefitsthebest
AT yenchengfang measurementinvarianceofthesexualorientationmicroaggressioninventoryacrosslgbmalesandfemalesintaiwanbifactorstructurefitsthebest
AT griffithsmarkd measurementinvarianceofthesexualorientationmicroaggressioninventoryacrosslgbmalesandfemalesintaiwanbifactorstructurefitsthebest
AT huangyute measurementinvarianceofthesexualorientationmicroaggressioninventoryacrosslgbmalesandfemalesintaiwanbifactorstructurefitsthebest