Cargando…
Monkeys exhibit a paradoxical decrease in performance in high-stakes scenarios
In high-stakes situations, people sometimes exhibit a frustrating phenomenon known as “choking under pressure.” Usually, we perform better when the potential payoff is larger. However, once potential rewards get too high, performance paradoxically decreases—we “choke.” Why do we choke under pressure...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
National Academy of Sciences
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8536322/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34426504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2109643118 |
_version_ | 1784587992991531008 |
---|---|
author | Smoulder, Adam L. Pavlovsky, Nicholas P. Marino, Patrick J. Degenhart, Alan D. McClain, Nicole T. Batista, Aaron P. Chase, Steven M. |
author_facet | Smoulder, Adam L. Pavlovsky, Nicholas P. Marino, Patrick J. Degenhart, Alan D. McClain, Nicole T. Batista, Aaron P. Chase, Steven M. |
author_sort | Smoulder, Adam L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In high-stakes situations, people sometimes exhibit a frustrating phenomenon known as “choking under pressure.” Usually, we perform better when the potential payoff is larger. However, once potential rewards get too high, performance paradoxically decreases—we “choke.” Why do we choke under pressure? An animal model of choking would facilitate the investigation of its neural basis. However, it could be that choking is a uniquely human occurrence. To determine whether animals also choke, we trained three rhesus monkeys to perform a difficult reaching task in which they knew in advance the amount of reward to be given upon successful completion. Like humans, monkeys performed worse when potential rewards were exceptionally valuable. Failures that occurred at the highest level of reward were due to overly cautious reaching, in line with the psychological theory that explicit monitoring of behavior leads to choking. Our results demonstrate that choking under pressure is not unique to humans, and thus, its neural basis might be conserved across species. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8536322 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | National Academy of Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85363222021-10-27 Monkeys exhibit a paradoxical decrease in performance in high-stakes scenarios Smoulder, Adam L. Pavlovsky, Nicholas P. Marino, Patrick J. Degenhart, Alan D. McClain, Nicole T. Batista, Aaron P. Chase, Steven M. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Biological Sciences In high-stakes situations, people sometimes exhibit a frustrating phenomenon known as “choking under pressure.” Usually, we perform better when the potential payoff is larger. However, once potential rewards get too high, performance paradoxically decreases—we “choke.” Why do we choke under pressure? An animal model of choking would facilitate the investigation of its neural basis. However, it could be that choking is a uniquely human occurrence. To determine whether animals also choke, we trained three rhesus monkeys to perform a difficult reaching task in which they knew in advance the amount of reward to be given upon successful completion. Like humans, monkeys performed worse when potential rewards were exceptionally valuable. Failures that occurred at the highest level of reward were due to overly cautious reaching, in line with the psychological theory that explicit monitoring of behavior leads to choking. Our results demonstrate that choking under pressure is not unique to humans, and thus, its neural basis might be conserved across species. National Academy of Sciences 2021-08-31 2021-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8536322/ /pubmed/34426504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2109643118 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by PNAS. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Biological Sciences Smoulder, Adam L. Pavlovsky, Nicholas P. Marino, Patrick J. Degenhart, Alan D. McClain, Nicole T. Batista, Aaron P. Chase, Steven M. Monkeys exhibit a paradoxical decrease in performance in high-stakes scenarios |
title | Monkeys exhibit a paradoxical decrease in performance in high-stakes scenarios |
title_full | Monkeys exhibit a paradoxical decrease in performance in high-stakes scenarios |
title_fullStr | Monkeys exhibit a paradoxical decrease in performance in high-stakes scenarios |
title_full_unstemmed | Monkeys exhibit a paradoxical decrease in performance in high-stakes scenarios |
title_short | Monkeys exhibit a paradoxical decrease in performance in high-stakes scenarios |
title_sort | monkeys exhibit a paradoxical decrease in performance in high-stakes scenarios |
topic | Biological Sciences |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8536322/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34426504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2109643118 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT smoulderadaml monkeysexhibitaparadoxicaldecreaseinperformanceinhighstakesscenarios AT pavlovskynicholasp monkeysexhibitaparadoxicaldecreaseinperformanceinhighstakesscenarios AT marinopatrickj monkeysexhibitaparadoxicaldecreaseinperformanceinhighstakesscenarios AT degenhartaland monkeysexhibitaparadoxicaldecreaseinperformanceinhighstakesscenarios AT mcclainnicolet monkeysexhibitaparadoxicaldecreaseinperformanceinhighstakesscenarios AT batistaaaronp monkeysexhibitaparadoxicaldecreaseinperformanceinhighstakesscenarios AT chasestevenm monkeysexhibitaparadoxicaldecreaseinperformanceinhighstakesscenarios |