Cargando…

Monkeys exhibit a paradoxical decrease in performance in high-stakes scenarios

In high-stakes situations, people sometimes exhibit a frustrating phenomenon known as “choking under pressure.” Usually, we perform better when the potential payoff is larger. However, once potential rewards get too high, performance paradoxically decreases—we “choke.” Why do we choke under pressure...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smoulder, Adam L., Pavlovsky, Nicholas P., Marino, Patrick J., Degenhart, Alan D., McClain, Nicole T., Batista, Aaron P., Chase, Steven M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: National Academy of Sciences 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8536322/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34426504
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2109643118
_version_ 1784587992991531008
author Smoulder, Adam L.
Pavlovsky, Nicholas P.
Marino, Patrick J.
Degenhart, Alan D.
McClain, Nicole T.
Batista, Aaron P.
Chase, Steven M.
author_facet Smoulder, Adam L.
Pavlovsky, Nicholas P.
Marino, Patrick J.
Degenhart, Alan D.
McClain, Nicole T.
Batista, Aaron P.
Chase, Steven M.
author_sort Smoulder, Adam L.
collection PubMed
description In high-stakes situations, people sometimes exhibit a frustrating phenomenon known as “choking under pressure.” Usually, we perform better when the potential payoff is larger. However, once potential rewards get too high, performance paradoxically decreases—we “choke.” Why do we choke under pressure? An animal model of choking would facilitate the investigation of its neural basis. However, it could be that choking is a uniquely human occurrence. To determine whether animals also choke, we trained three rhesus monkeys to perform a difficult reaching task in which they knew in advance the amount of reward to be given upon successful completion. Like humans, monkeys performed worse when potential rewards were exceptionally valuable. Failures that occurred at the highest level of reward were due to overly cautious reaching, in line with the psychological theory that explicit monitoring of behavior leads to choking. Our results demonstrate that choking under pressure is not unique to humans, and thus, its neural basis might be conserved across species.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8536322
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher National Academy of Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85363222021-10-27 Monkeys exhibit a paradoxical decrease in performance in high-stakes scenarios Smoulder, Adam L. Pavlovsky, Nicholas P. Marino, Patrick J. Degenhart, Alan D. McClain, Nicole T. Batista, Aaron P. Chase, Steven M. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Biological Sciences In high-stakes situations, people sometimes exhibit a frustrating phenomenon known as “choking under pressure.” Usually, we perform better when the potential payoff is larger. However, once potential rewards get too high, performance paradoxically decreases—we “choke.” Why do we choke under pressure? An animal model of choking would facilitate the investigation of its neural basis. However, it could be that choking is a uniquely human occurrence. To determine whether animals also choke, we trained three rhesus monkeys to perform a difficult reaching task in which they knew in advance the amount of reward to be given upon successful completion. Like humans, monkeys performed worse when potential rewards were exceptionally valuable. Failures that occurred at the highest level of reward were due to overly cautious reaching, in line with the psychological theory that explicit monitoring of behavior leads to choking. Our results demonstrate that choking under pressure is not unique to humans, and thus, its neural basis might be conserved across species. National Academy of Sciences 2021-08-31 2021-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8536322/ /pubmed/34426504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2109643118 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by PNAS. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Biological Sciences
Smoulder, Adam L.
Pavlovsky, Nicholas P.
Marino, Patrick J.
Degenhart, Alan D.
McClain, Nicole T.
Batista, Aaron P.
Chase, Steven M.
Monkeys exhibit a paradoxical decrease in performance in high-stakes scenarios
title Monkeys exhibit a paradoxical decrease in performance in high-stakes scenarios
title_full Monkeys exhibit a paradoxical decrease in performance in high-stakes scenarios
title_fullStr Monkeys exhibit a paradoxical decrease in performance in high-stakes scenarios
title_full_unstemmed Monkeys exhibit a paradoxical decrease in performance in high-stakes scenarios
title_short Monkeys exhibit a paradoxical decrease in performance in high-stakes scenarios
title_sort monkeys exhibit a paradoxical decrease in performance in high-stakes scenarios
topic Biological Sciences
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8536322/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34426504
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2109643118
work_keys_str_mv AT smoulderadaml monkeysexhibitaparadoxicaldecreaseinperformanceinhighstakesscenarios
AT pavlovskynicholasp monkeysexhibitaparadoxicaldecreaseinperformanceinhighstakesscenarios
AT marinopatrickj monkeysexhibitaparadoxicaldecreaseinperformanceinhighstakesscenarios
AT degenhartaland monkeysexhibitaparadoxicaldecreaseinperformanceinhighstakesscenarios
AT mcclainnicolet monkeysexhibitaparadoxicaldecreaseinperformanceinhighstakesscenarios
AT batistaaaronp monkeysexhibitaparadoxicaldecreaseinperformanceinhighstakesscenarios
AT chasestevenm monkeysexhibitaparadoxicaldecreaseinperformanceinhighstakesscenarios