Cargando…

Diagnostic accuracy of glabellar tap sign for Parkinson’s disease

Glabellar tap or reflex (GR) is an old bedside clinical test used in the diagnostics of Parkinson’s disease (PD), but its diagnostic value is unclear. This study examines the diagnostic validity and reliability of GR in PD in relation to brain dopaminergic activity. GR was performed on 161 patients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nuuttila, Simo, Eklund, Mikael, Joutsa, Juho, Jaakkola, Elina, Mäkinen, Elina, Honkanen, Emma A., Lindholm, Kari, Noponen, Tommi, Ihalainen, Toni, Murtomäki, Kirsi, Nojonen, Tanja, Levo, Reeta, Mertsalmi, Tuomas, Scheperjans, Filip, Kaasinen, Valtteri
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Vienna 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8536581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34328563
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00702-021-02391-3
_version_ 1784588039315521536
author Nuuttila, Simo
Eklund, Mikael
Joutsa, Juho
Jaakkola, Elina
Mäkinen, Elina
Honkanen, Emma A.
Lindholm, Kari
Noponen, Tommi
Ihalainen, Toni
Murtomäki, Kirsi
Nojonen, Tanja
Levo, Reeta
Mertsalmi, Tuomas
Scheperjans, Filip
Kaasinen, Valtteri
author_facet Nuuttila, Simo
Eklund, Mikael
Joutsa, Juho
Jaakkola, Elina
Mäkinen, Elina
Honkanen, Emma A.
Lindholm, Kari
Noponen, Tommi
Ihalainen, Toni
Murtomäki, Kirsi
Nojonen, Tanja
Levo, Reeta
Mertsalmi, Tuomas
Scheperjans, Filip
Kaasinen, Valtteri
author_sort Nuuttila, Simo
collection PubMed
description Glabellar tap or reflex (GR) is an old bedside clinical test used in the diagnostics of Parkinson’s disease (PD), but its diagnostic value is unclear. This study examines the diagnostic validity and reliability of GR in PD in relation to brain dopaminergic activity. GR was performed on 161 patients with PD, 47 patients with essential tremor (ET) and 40 healthy controls immediately prior to dopamine transporter (DAT) [(123)I]FP-CIT SPECT scanning. The binding ratios were investigated with consideration of the GR result (normal/abnormal). In addition, the consistency of the GR was investigated with 89 patients after a mean follow-up of 2.2 years. PD and ET patients had higher GR scores than healthy controls (p < 0.001), but there was no difference in GR between PD and ET patients (p = 0.09). There were no differences in the ratio of abnormal to normal GRs between the PD and ET groups (73% vs. 64% abnormal, respectively, p = 0.13) or in DAT binding between PD patients with abnormal and normal GRs (p > 0.36). Over follow-up, the GR changed from abnormal to normal in 20% of PD patients despite the presence of clinically typical disease. The sensitivity and specificity of GR for differentiating PD from ET were 78.3% and 36.2%, respectively. Although GR has been used by clinicians in the diagnostics of PD, it does not separate PD from ET. It also shows considerable inconsistency over time, and abnormal GR has no relationship with dopamine loss. Its usefulness should be tested for other clinical diagnostic purposes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8536581
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Vienna
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85365812021-11-04 Diagnostic accuracy of glabellar tap sign for Parkinson’s disease Nuuttila, Simo Eklund, Mikael Joutsa, Juho Jaakkola, Elina Mäkinen, Elina Honkanen, Emma A. Lindholm, Kari Noponen, Tommi Ihalainen, Toni Murtomäki, Kirsi Nojonen, Tanja Levo, Reeta Mertsalmi, Tuomas Scheperjans, Filip Kaasinen, Valtteri J Neural Transm (Vienna) Neurology and Preclinical Neurological Studies - Original Article Glabellar tap or reflex (GR) is an old bedside clinical test used in the diagnostics of Parkinson’s disease (PD), but its diagnostic value is unclear. This study examines the diagnostic validity and reliability of GR in PD in relation to brain dopaminergic activity. GR was performed on 161 patients with PD, 47 patients with essential tremor (ET) and 40 healthy controls immediately prior to dopamine transporter (DAT) [(123)I]FP-CIT SPECT scanning. The binding ratios were investigated with consideration of the GR result (normal/abnormal). In addition, the consistency of the GR was investigated with 89 patients after a mean follow-up of 2.2 years. PD and ET patients had higher GR scores than healthy controls (p < 0.001), but there was no difference in GR between PD and ET patients (p = 0.09). There were no differences in the ratio of abnormal to normal GRs between the PD and ET groups (73% vs. 64% abnormal, respectively, p = 0.13) or in DAT binding between PD patients with abnormal and normal GRs (p > 0.36). Over follow-up, the GR changed from abnormal to normal in 20% of PD patients despite the presence of clinically typical disease. The sensitivity and specificity of GR for differentiating PD from ET were 78.3% and 36.2%, respectively. Although GR has been used by clinicians in the diagnostics of PD, it does not separate PD from ET. It also shows considerable inconsistency over time, and abnormal GR has no relationship with dopamine loss. Its usefulness should be tested for other clinical diagnostic purposes. Springer Vienna 2021-07-30 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8536581/ /pubmed/34328563 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00702-021-02391-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Neurology and Preclinical Neurological Studies - Original Article
Nuuttila, Simo
Eklund, Mikael
Joutsa, Juho
Jaakkola, Elina
Mäkinen, Elina
Honkanen, Emma A.
Lindholm, Kari
Noponen, Tommi
Ihalainen, Toni
Murtomäki, Kirsi
Nojonen, Tanja
Levo, Reeta
Mertsalmi, Tuomas
Scheperjans, Filip
Kaasinen, Valtteri
Diagnostic accuracy of glabellar tap sign for Parkinson’s disease
title Diagnostic accuracy of glabellar tap sign for Parkinson’s disease
title_full Diagnostic accuracy of glabellar tap sign for Parkinson’s disease
title_fullStr Diagnostic accuracy of glabellar tap sign for Parkinson’s disease
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic accuracy of glabellar tap sign for Parkinson’s disease
title_short Diagnostic accuracy of glabellar tap sign for Parkinson’s disease
title_sort diagnostic accuracy of glabellar tap sign for parkinson’s disease
topic Neurology and Preclinical Neurological Studies - Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8536581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34328563
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00702-021-02391-3
work_keys_str_mv AT nuuttilasimo diagnosticaccuracyofglabellartapsignforparkinsonsdisease
AT eklundmikael diagnosticaccuracyofglabellartapsignforparkinsonsdisease
AT joutsajuho diagnosticaccuracyofglabellartapsignforparkinsonsdisease
AT jaakkolaelina diagnosticaccuracyofglabellartapsignforparkinsonsdisease
AT makinenelina diagnosticaccuracyofglabellartapsignforparkinsonsdisease
AT honkanenemmaa diagnosticaccuracyofglabellartapsignforparkinsonsdisease
AT lindholmkari diagnosticaccuracyofglabellartapsignforparkinsonsdisease
AT noponentommi diagnosticaccuracyofglabellartapsignforparkinsonsdisease
AT ihalainentoni diagnosticaccuracyofglabellartapsignforparkinsonsdisease
AT murtomakikirsi diagnosticaccuracyofglabellartapsignforparkinsonsdisease
AT nojonentanja diagnosticaccuracyofglabellartapsignforparkinsonsdisease
AT levoreeta diagnosticaccuracyofglabellartapsignforparkinsonsdisease
AT mertsalmituomas diagnosticaccuracyofglabellartapsignforparkinsonsdisease
AT scheperjansfilip diagnosticaccuracyofglabellartapsignforparkinsonsdisease
AT kaasinenvaltteri diagnosticaccuracyofglabellartapsignforparkinsonsdisease