Cargando…
Diagnostic accuracy of glabellar tap sign for Parkinson’s disease
Glabellar tap or reflex (GR) is an old bedside clinical test used in the diagnostics of Parkinson’s disease (PD), but its diagnostic value is unclear. This study examines the diagnostic validity and reliability of GR in PD in relation to brain dopaminergic activity. GR was performed on 161 patients...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Vienna
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8536581/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34328563 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00702-021-02391-3 |
_version_ | 1784588039315521536 |
---|---|
author | Nuuttila, Simo Eklund, Mikael Joutsa, Juho Jaakkola, Elina Mäkinen, Elina Honkanen, Emma A. Lindholm, Kari Noponen, Tommi Ihalainen, Toni Murtomäki, Kirsi Nojonen, Tanja Levo, Reeta Mertsalmi, Tuomas Scheperjans, Filip Kaasinen, Valtteri |
author_facet | Nuuttila, Simo Eklund, Mikael Joutsa, Juho Jaakkola, Elina Mäkinen, Elina Honkanen, Emma A. Lindholm, Kari Noponen, Tommi Ihalainen, Toni Murtomäki, Kirsi Nojonen, Tanja Levo, Reeta Mertsalmi, Tuomas Scheperjans, Filip Kaasinen, Valtteri |
author_sort | Nuuttila, Simo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Glabellar tap or reflex (GR) is an old bedside clinical test used in the diagnostics of Parkinson’s disease (PD), but its diagnostic value is unclear. This study examines the diagnostic validity and reliability of GR in PD in relation to brain dopaminergic activity. GR was performed on 161 patients with PD, 47 patients with essential tremor (ET) and 40 healthy controls immediately prior to dopamine transporter (DAT) [(123)I]FP-CIT SPECT scanning. The binding ratios were investigated with consideration of the GR result (normal/abnormal). In addition, the consistency of the GR was investigated with 89 patients after a mean follow-up of 2.2 years. PD and ET patients had higher GR scores than healthy controls (p < 0.001), but there was no difference in GR between PD and ET patients (p = 0.09). There were no differences in the ratio of abnormal to normal GRs between the PD and ET groups (73% vs. 64% abnormal, respectively, p = 0.13) or in DAT binding between PD patients with abnormal and normal GRs (p > 0.36). Over follow-up, the GR changed from abnormal to normal in 20% of PD patients despite the presence of clinically typical disease. The sensitivity and specificity of GR for differentiating PD from ET were 78.3% and 36.2%, respectively. Although GR has been used by clinicians in the diagnostics of PD, it does not separate PD from ET. It also shows considerable inconsistency over time, and abnormal GR has no relationship with dopamine loss. Its usefulness should be tested for other clinical diagnostic purposes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8536581 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Vienna |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85365812021-11-04 Diagnostic accuracy of glabellar tap sign for Parkinson’s disease Nuuttila, Simo Eklund, Mikael Joutsa, Juho Jaakkola, Elina Mäkinen, Elina Honkanen, Emma A. Lindholm, Kari Noponen, Tommi Ihalainen, Toni Murtomäki, Kirsi Nojonen, Tanja Levo, Reeta Mertsalmi, Tuomas Scheperjans, Filip Kaasinen, Valtteri J Neural Transm (Vienna) Neurology and Preclinical Neurological Studies - Original Article Glabellar tap or reflex (GR) is an old bedside clinical test used in the diagnostics of Parkinson’s disease (PD), but its diagnostic value is unclear. This study examines the diagnostic validity and reliability of GR in PD in relation to brain dopaminergic activity. GR was performed on 161 patients with PD, 47 patients with essential tremor (ET) and 40 healthy controls immediately prior to dopamine transporter (DAT) [(123)I]FP-CIT SPECT scanning. The binding ratios were investigated with consideration of the GR result (normal/abnormal). In addition, the consistency of the GR was investigated with 89 patients after a mean follow-up of 2.2 years. PD and ET patients had higher GR scores than healthy controls (p < 0.001), but there was no difference in GR between PD and ET patients (p = 0.09). There were no differences in the ratio of abnormal to normal GRs between the PD and ET groups (73% vs. 64% abnormal, respectively, p = 0.13) or in DAT binding between PD patients with abnormal and normal GRs (p > 0.36). Over follow-up, the GR changed from abnormal to normal in 20% of PD patients despite the presence of clinically typical disease. The sensitivity and specificity of GR for differentiating PD from ET were 78.3% and 36.2%, respectively. Although GR has been used by clinicians in the diagnostics of PD, it does not separate PD from ET. It also shows considerable inconsistency over time, and abnormal GR has no relationship with dopamine loss. Its usefulness should be tested for other clinical diagnostic purposes. Springer Vienna 2021-07-30 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8536581/ /pubmed/34328563 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00702-021-02391-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Neurology and Preclinical Neurological Studies - Original Article Nuuttila, Simo Eklund, Mikael Joutsa, Juho Jaakkola, Elina Mäkinen, Elina Honkanen, Emma A. Lindholm, Kari Noponen, Tommi Ihalainen, Toni Murtomäki, Kirsi Nojonen, Tanja Levo, Reeta Mertsalmi, Tuomas Scheperjans, Filip Kaasinen, Valtteri Diagnostic accuracy of glabellar tap sign for Parkinson’s disease |
title | Diagnostic accuracy of glabellar tap sign for Parkinson’s disease |
title_full | Diagnostic accuracy of glabellar tap sign for Parkinson’s disease |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic accuracy of glabellar tap sign for Parkinson’s disease |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic accuracy of glabellar tap sign for Parkinson’s disease |
title_short | Diagnostic accuracy of glabellar tap sign for Parkinson’s disease |
title_sort | diagnostic accuracy of glabellar tap sign for parkinson’s disease |
topic | Neurology and Preclinical Neurological Studies - Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8536581/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34328563 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00702-021-02391-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nuuttilasimo diagnosticaccuracyofglabellartapsignforparkinsonsdisease AT eklundmikael diagnosticaccuracyofglabellartapsignforparkinsonsdisease AT joutsajuho diagnosticaccuracyofglabellartapsignforparkinsonsdisease AT jaakkolaelina diagnosticaccuracyofglabellartapsignforparkinsonsdisease AT makinenelina diagnosticaccuracyofglabellartapsignforparkinsonsdisease AT honkanenemmaa diagnosticaccuracyofglabellartapsignforparkinsonsdisease AT lindholmkari diagnosticaccuracyofglabellartapsignforparkinsonsdisease AT noponentommi diagnosticaccuracyofglabellartapsignforparkinsonsdisease AT ihalainentoni diagnosticaccuracyofglabellartapsignforparkinsonsdisease AT murtomakikirsi diagnosticaccuracyofglabellartapsignforparkinsonsdisease AT nojonentanja diagnosticaccuracyofglabellartapsignforparkinsonsdisease AT levoreeta diagnosticaccuracyofglabellartapsignforparkinsonsdisease AT mertsalmituomas diagnosticaccuracyofglabellartapsignforparkinsonsdisease AT scheperjansfilip diagnosticaccuracyofglabellartapsignforparkinsonsdisease AT kaasinenvaltteri diagnosticaccuracyofglabellartapsignforparkinsonsdisease |