Cargando…
Ruxolitinib exposure in patients with acute and chronic graft versus host disease in routine clinical practice—a prospective single-center trial
PURPOSE: Knowledge on Ruxolitinib exposure in patients with graft versus host disease (GvHD) is scarce. The purpose of this prospective study was to analyze Ruxolitinib concentrations of GvHD patients and to investigate effects of CYP3A4 and CYP2C9 inhibitors and other covariates as well as concentr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8536600/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34505930 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00280-021-04351-w |
_version_ | 1784588045716029440 |
---|---|
author | Isberner, Nora Kraus, Sabrina Grigoleit, Götz Ulrich Aghai, Fatemeh Kurlbaum, Max Zimmermann, Sebastian Klinker, Hartwig Scherf-Clavel, Oliver |
author_facet | Isberner, Nora Kraus, Sabrina Grigoleit, Götz Ulrich Aghai, Fatemeh Kurlbaum, Max Zimmermann, Sebastian Klinker, Hartwig Scherf-Clavel, Oliver |
author_sort | Isberner, Nora |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Knowledge on Ruxolitinib exposure in patients with graft versus host disease (GvHD) is scarce. The purpose of this prospective study was to analyze Ruxolitinib concentrations of GvHD patients and to investigate effects of CYP3A4 and CYP2C9 inhibitors and other covariates as well as concentration-dependent effects. METHODS: 262 blood samples of 29 patients with acute or chronic GvHD who were administered Ruxolitinib during clinical routine were analyzed. A population pharmacokinetic model obtained from myelofibrosis patients was adapted to our population and was used to identify relevant pharmacokinetic properties and covariates on drug exposure. Relationships between Ruxolitinib exposure and adverse events were assessed. RESULTS: Median of individual mean trough serum concentrations was 39.9 ng/mL at 10 mg twice daily (IQR 27.1 ng/mL, range 5.6–99.8 ng/mL). Applying a population pharmacokinetic model revealed that concentrations in our cohort were significantly higher compared to myelofibrosis patients receiving the same daily dose (p < 0.001). Increased Ruxolitinib exposure was caused by a significant reduction in Ruxolitinib clearance by approximately 50%. Additional comedication with at least one strong CYP3A4 or CYP2C9 inhibitor led to a further reduction by 15% (p < 0.05). No other covariate affected pharmacokinetics significantly. Mean trough concentrations of patients requiring dose reduction related to adverse events were significantly elevated (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Ruxolitinib exposure is increased in GvHD patients in comparison to myelofibrosis patients due to reduced clearance and comedication with CYP3A4 or CYP2C9 inhibitors. Elevated Ruxolitinib trough concentrations might be a surrogate for toxicity. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00280-021-04351-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8536600 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85366002021-10-27 Ruxolitinib exposure in patients with acute and chronic graft versus host disease in routine clinical practice—a prospective single-center trial Isberner, Nora Kraus, Sabrina Grigoleit, Götz Ulrich Aghai, Fatemeh Kurlbaum, Max Zimmermann, Sebastian Klinker, Hartwig Scherf-Clavel, Oliver Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Original Article PURPOSE: Knowledge on Ruxolitinib exposure in patients with graft versus host disease (GvHD) is scarce. The purpose of this prospective study was to analyze Ruxolitinib concentrations of GvHD patients and to investigate effects of CYP3A4 and CYP2C9 inhibitors and other covariates as well as concentration-dependent effects. METHODS: 262 blood samples of 29 patients with acute or chronic GvHD who were administered Ruxolitinib during clinical routine were analyzed. A population pharmacokinetic model obtained from myelofibrosis patients was adapted to our population and was used to identify relevant pharmacokinetic properties and covariates on drug exposure. Relationships between Ruxolitinib exposure and adverse events were assessed. RESULTS: Median of individual mean trough serum concentrations was 39.9 ng/mL at 10 mg twice daily (IQR 27.1 ng/mL, range 5.6–99.8 ng/mL). Applying a population pharmacokinetic model revealed that concentrations in our cohort were significantly higher compared to myelofibrosis patients receiving the same daily dose (p < 0.001). Increased Ruxolitinib exposure was caused by a significant reduction in Ruxolitinib clearance by approximately 50%. Additional comedication with at least one strong CYP3A4 or CYP2C9 inhibitor led to a further reduction by 15% (p < 0.05). No other covariate affected pharmacokinetics significantly. Mean trough concentrations of patients requiring dose reduction related to adverse events were significantly elevated (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Ruxolitinib exposure is increased in GvHD patients in comparison to myelofibrosis patients due to reduced clearance and comedication with CYP3A4 or CYP2C9 inhibitors. Elevated Ruxolitinib trough concentrations might be a surrogate for toxicity. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00280-021-04351-w. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-09-10 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8536600/ /pubmed/34505930 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00280-021-04351-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Isberner, Nora Kraus, Sabrina Grigoleit, Götz Ulrich Aghai, Fatemeh Kurlbaum, Max Zimmermann, Sebastian Klinker, Hartwig Scherf-Clavel, Oliver Ruxolitinib exposure in patients with acute and chronic graft versus host disease in routine clinical practice—a prospective single-center trial |
title | Ruxolitinib exposure in patients with acute and chronic graft versus host disease in routine clinical practice—a prospective single-center trial |
title_full | Ruxolitinib exposure in patients with acute and chronic graft versus host disease in routine clinical practice—a prospective single-center trial |
title_fullStr | Ruxolitinib exposure in patients with acute and chronic graft versus host disease in routine clinical practice—a prospective single-center trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Ruxolitinib exposure in patients with acute and chronic graft versus host disease in routine clinical practice—a prospective single-center trial |
title_short | Ruxolitinib exposure in patients with acute and chronic graft versus host disease in routine clinical practice—a prospective single-center trial |
title_sort | ruxolitinib exposure in patients with acute and chronic graft versus host disease in routine clinical practice—a prospective single-center trial |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8536600/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34505930 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00280-021-04351-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT isbernernora ruxolitinibexposureinpatientswithacuteandchronicgraftversushostdiseaseinroutineclinicalpracticeaprospectivesinglecentertrial AT kraussabrina ruxolitinibexposureinpatientswithacuteandchronicgraftversushostdiseaseinroutineclinicalpracticeaprospectivesinglecentertrial AT grigoleitgotzulrich ruxolitinibexposureinpatientswithacuteandchronicgraftversushostdiseaseinroutineclinicalpracticeaprospectivesinglecentertrial AT aghaifatemeh ruxolitinibexposureinpatientswithacuteandchronicgraftversushostdiseaseinroutineclinicalpracticeaprospectivesinglecentertrial AT kurlbaummax ruxolitinibexposureinpatientswithacuteandchronicgraftversushostdiseaseinroutineclinicalpracticeaprospectivesinglecentertrial AT zimmermannsebastian ruxolitinibexposureinpatientswithacuteandchronicgraftversushostdiseaseinroutineclinicalpracticeaprospectivesinglecentertrial AT klinkerhartwig ruxolitinibexposureinpatientswithacuteandchronicgraftversushostdiseaseinroutineclinicalpracticeaprospectivesinglecentertrial AT scherfclaveloliver ruxolitinibexposureinpatientswithacuteandchronicgraftversushostdiseaseinroutineclinicalpracticeaprospectivesinglecentertrial |