Cargando…

Clinicopathological Difference and Survival Impact of Patients with c-SCLC and SCLC

BACKGROUND: Combined small cell lung cancer (c-SCLC) distinguishes itself from small cell lung cancer (SCLC) due to its inclusion of both SCLC and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) components. Few studies have compared clinicopathological characteristics, prognosis and factors affecting survival. W...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Chenyue, Shang, Xiaoling, Sun, Jian, Li, Zhenxiang, Lin, Jiamao, Zhao, Chenglong, Wang, Haiyong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8536838/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34703294
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S332725
_version_ 1784588106498834432
author Zhang, Chenyue
Shang, Xiaoling
Sun, Jian
Li, Zhenxiang
Lin, Jiamao
Zhao, Chenglong
Wang, Haiyong
author_facet Zhang, Chenyue
Shang, Xiaoling
Sun, Jian
Li, Zhenxiang
Lin, Jiamao
Zhao, Chenglong
Wang, Haiyong
author_sort Zhang, Chenyue
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Combined small cell lung cancer (c-SCLC) distinguishes itself from small cell lung cancer (SCLC) due to its inclusion of both SCLC and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) components. Few studies have compared clinicopathological characteristics, prognosis and factors affecting survival. We therefore addressed the issues in this study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 400 c-SCLC and 20,841 SCLC patients were enrolled using SEER database. Difference in clinicopathological characteristics of SCLC and c-SCLC patients was analyzed using chi-square. Kaplan–Meier was applied to compare their survival before and after propensity score matching (PSM). Cox regression model was adopted to assess the impact of different clinical variables on survival. Logistic regression was applied to identify risk factors for c-SCLC and SCLC patients. RESULTS: Differences in race, sex, T stage, N stage, surgery, bone, brain and liver metastasis were detected between c-SCLC and SCLC patients. c-SCLC patients had better overall survival (OS) than SCLC patients before PSM. Age, race, sex, T stage, N stage, surgery, bone, brain, liver and lung metastasis were prognostic factors affecting OS for c-SCLC and SCLC (P < 0.05). However, a significant OS benefit was not observed in c-SCLC after adjusting for clinicopathological variables (HR, 0.950; 95% CI, 0.842–1.073; P=0.411). No significant OS difference was found between c-SCLC and SCLC patients after PSM (P = 0.789). c-SCLC patients had lower risk of lymph node (OR: 0.555; 95% CI: 0.439–0.703; P < 0.001) and liver metastasis (OR: 0.591; 95% CI: 0.448–0.779; P < 0.001), whereas had no significant differences in bone and brain metastasis risks (P > 0.05) compared with SCLC patients. CONCLUSION: The prognosis of c-SCLC did not significantly differ from that of SCLC if clinicopathological characteristics are controlled. Better prognosis for c-SCLC patients over SCLC patients may be ascribed to fewer liver and lymph node metastases upon diagnosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8536838
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85368382021-10-25 Clinicopathological Difference and Survival Impact of Patients with c-SCLC and SCLC Zhang, Chenyue Shang, Xiaoling Sun, Jian Li, Zhenxiang Lin, Jiamao Zhao, Chenglong Wang, Haiyong Int J Gen Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Combined small cell lung cancer (c-SCLC) distinguishes itself from small cell lung cancer (SCLC) due to its inclusion of both SCLC and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) components. Few studies have compared clinicopathological characteristics, prognosis and factors affecting survival. We therefore addressed the issues in this study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 400 c-SCLC and 20,841 SCLC patients were enrolled using SEER database. Difference in clinicopathological characteristics of SCLC and c-SCLC patients was analyzed using chi-square. Kaplan–Meier was applied to compare their survival before and after propensity score matching (PSM). Cox regression model was adopted to assess the impact of different clinical variables on survival. Logistic regression was applied to identify risk factors for c-SCLC and SCLC patients. RESULTS: Differences in race, sex, T stage, N stage, surgery, bone, brain and liver metastasis were detected between c-SCLC and SCLC patients. c-SCLC patients had better overall survival (OS) than SCLC patients before PSM. Age, race, sex, T stage, N stage, surgery, bone, brain, liver and lung metastasis were prognostic factors affecting OS for c-SCLC and SCLC (P < 0.05). However, a significant OS benefit was not observed in c-SCLC after adjusting for clinicopathological variables (HR, 0.950; 95% CI, 0.842–1.073; P=0.411). No significant OS difference was found between c-SCLC and SCLC patients after PSM (P = 0.789). c-SCLC patients had lower risk of lymph node (OR: 0.555; 95% CI: 0.439–0.703; P < 0.001) and liver metastasis (OR: 0.591; 95% CI: 0.448–0.779; P < 0.001), whereas had no significant differences in bone and brain metastasis risks (P > 0.05) compared with SCLC patients. CONCLUSION: The prognosis of c-SCLC did not significantly differ from that of SCLC if clinicopathological characteristics are controlled. Better prognosis for c-SCLC patients over SCLC patients may be ascribed to fewer liver and lymph node metastases upon diagnosis. Dove 2021-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8536838/ /pubmed/34703294 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S332725 Text en © 2021 Zhang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Zhang, Chenyue
Shang, Xiaoling
Sun, Jian
Li, Zhenxiang
Lin, Jiamao
Zhao, Chenglong
Wang, Haiyong
Clinicopathological Difference and Survival Impact of Patients with c-SCLC and SCLC
title Clinicopathological Difference and Survival Impact of Patients with c-SCLC and SCLC
title_full Clinicopathological Difference and Survival Impact of Patients with c-SCLC and SCLC
title_fullStr Clinicopathological Difference and Survival Impact of Patients with c-SCLC and SCLC
title_full_unstemmed Clinicopathological Difference and Survival Impact of Patients with c-SCLC and SCLC
title_short Clinicopathological Difference and Survival Impact of Patients with c-SCLC and SCLC
title_sort clinicopathological difference and survival impact of patients with c-sclc and sclc
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8536838/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34703294
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S332725
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangchenyue clinicopathologicaldifferenceandsurvivalimpactofpatientswithcsclcandsclc
AT shangxiaoling clinicopathologicaldifferenceandsurvivalimpactofpatientswithcsclcandsclc
AT sunjian clinicopathologicaldifferenceandsurvivalimpactofpatientswithcsclcandsclc
AT lizhenxiang clinicopathologicaldifferenceandsurvivalimpactofpatientswithcsclcandsclc
AT linjiamao clinicopathologicaldifferenceandsurvivalimpactofpatientswithcsclcandsclc
AT zhaochenglong clinicopathologicaldifferenceandsurvivalimpactofpatientswithcsclcandsclc
AT wanghaiyong clinicopathologicaldifferenceandsurvivalimpactofpatientswithcsclcandsclc