Cargando…
Predicting T and N Staging of Resectable Gastric Cancer According to Whole Tumor Histogram Analysis About a Non-Cartesian k-Space Acquisition DCE-MRI: A Feasibility Study
OBJECTIVE: To explore the feasibility of the whole tumor histogram analysis parameters derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) based on stack-of stars (StarVIBE) to predict T and N staging of resectable gastric cancer (GC). METHODS: Eighty-seven patients confirmed as GC by histopatholog...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8536841/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34703316 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S326874 |
Sumario: | OBJECTIVE: To explore the feasibility of the whole tumor histogram analysis parameters derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) based on stack-of stars (StarVIBE) to predict T and N staging of resectable gastric cancer (GC). METHODS: Eighty-seven patients confirmed as GC by histopathology were enrolled in this prospective study. DCE-MRI were performed before surgery, and quantitative DCE parameters (K(trans), K(ep), V(e)) and histogram metrics (Skewness, Kurtosis and Entropy) were measured by Omni-Kinetics software. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) testing was used to determine the consistency of K(trans), K(ep) and V(e) values and histogram metrics values between two radiologists using Bland–Altman analysis. The quantitative DCE parameters or histogram metrics values between T stage or N stage were compared using ANOVA or Kruskal–Wallis testing. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses was performed to find out the best parameters for identifying T and N staging. RESULTS: There was statistical difference in K(trans), K(ep), V(e) and entropy to identify T staging (P=0.015, 0.033, <0.001, and 0.007, respectively), and in pairwise comparisons of V(e) values showed statistically difference between T1+2 and T3 group (P<0.001), T1+2 and T4 group (P<0.001). There were statistical differences in V(e) to identify N staging (P=0.041). In ROC analysis, V(e) was the best parameter for identifying T staging (AUC: 0.788, the sensitivity and specificity was 0.929 and 0.578, respectively) and N staging (AUC: 0.590, the sensitivity and specificity was 0.714 and 0.899, respectively). CONCLUSION: The whole tumor histogram analysis parameters derived from StarVIBE DCE-MRI may be able to quantitatively evaluate T and N staging of GC, so as to help clinical treatment decision optimization. |
---|