Cargando…

Minimally Invasive Surgery and Surgical Volume-Specific Survival and Perioperative Outcome: Unmet Need for Evidence in Gynecologic Malignancy

This study examined the effect of hospital surgical volume on oncologic outcomes in minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for gynecologic malignancies. The objectives were to assess survival outcomes related to hospital surgical volume and to evaluate perioperative outcomes and examine non-gynecologic ma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matsuzaki, Shinya, Klar, Maximilian, Chang, Erica J., Matsuzaki, Satoko, Maeda, Michihide, Zhang, Renee H., Roman, Lynda D., Matsuo, Koji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8537091/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34682910
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10204787
_version_ 1784588166668222464
author Matsuzaki, Shinya
Klar, Maximilian
Chang, Erica J.
Matsuzaki, Satoko
Maeda, Michihide
Zhang, Renee H.
Roman, Lynda D.
Matsuo, Koji
author_facet Matsuzaki, Shinya
Klar, Maximilian
Chang, Erica J.
Matsuzaki, Satoko
Maeda, Michihide
Zhang, Renee H.
Roman, Lynda D.
Matsuo, Koji
author_sort Matsuzaki, Shinya
collection PubMed
description This study examined the effect of hospital surgical volume on oncologic outcomes in minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for gynecologic malignancies. The objectives were to assess survival outcomes related to hospital surgical volume and to evaluate perioperative outcomes and examine non-gynecologic malignancies. Literature available from the PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library databases were systematically reviewed. All surgical procedures including gynecologic surgery with hospital surgical volume information were eligible for analysis. Twenty-three studies met the inclusion criteria, and nine gastro-intestinal studies, seven genitourinary studies, four gynecological studies, two hepatobiliary studies, and one thoracic study were reviewed. Of those, 11 showed a positive volume–outcome association for perioperative outcomes. A study on MIS for ovarian cancer reported lower surgical morbidity in high-volume centers. Two studies were on endometrial cancer, of which one showed lower treatment costs in high-volume centers and the other showed no association with perioperative morbidity. Another study examined robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer and found no volume–outcome association for surgical morbidity. There were no gynecologic studies examining the association between hospital surgical volume and oncologic outcomes in MIS. The volume–outcome association for oncologic outcome in gynecologic MIS is understudied. This lack of evidence calls for further studies to address this knowledge gap.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8537091
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85370912021-10-24 Minimally Invasive Surgery and Surgical Volume-Specific Survival and Perioperative Outcome: Unmet Need for Evidence in Gynecologic Malignancy Matsuzaki, Shinya Klar, Maximilian Chang, Erica J. Matsuzaki, Satoko Maeda, Michihide Zhang, Renee H. Roman, Lynda D. Matsuo, Koji J Clin Med Article This study examined the effect of hospital surgical volume on oncologic outcomes in minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for gynecologic malignancies. The objectives were to assess survival outcomes related to hospital surgical volume and to evaluate perioperative outcomes and examine non-gynecologic malignancies. Literature available from the PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library databases were systematically reviewed. All surgical procedures including gynecologic surgery with hospital surgical volume information were eligible for analysis. Twenty-three studies met the inclusion criteria, and nine gastro-intestinal studies, seven genitourinary studies, four gynecological studies, two hepatobiliary studies, and one thoracic study were reviewed. Of those, 11 showed a positive volume–outcome association for perioperative outcomes. A study on MIS for ovarian cancer reported lower surgical morbidity in high-volume centers. Two studies were on endometrial cancer, of which one showed lower treatment costs in high-volume centers and the other showed no association with perioperative morbidity. Another study examined robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer and found no volume–outcome association for surgical morbidity. There were no gynecologic studies examining the association between hospital surgical volume and oncologic outcomes in MIS. The volume–outcome association for oncologic outcome in gynecologic MIS is understudied. This lack of evidence calls for further studies to address this knowledge gap. MDPI 2021-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8537091/ /pubmed/34682910 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10204787 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Matsuzaki, Shinya
Klar, Maximilian
Chang, Erica J.
Matsuzaki, Satoko
Maeda, Michihide
Zhang, Renee H.
Roman, Lynda D.
Matsuo, Koji
Minimally Invasive Surgery and Surgical Volume-Specific Survival and Perioperative Outcome: Unmet Need for Evidence in Gynecologic Malignancy
title Minimally Invasive Surgery and Surgical Volume-Specific Survival and Perioperative Outcome: Unmet Need for Evidence in Gynecologic Malignancy
title_full Minimally Invasive Surgery and Surgical Volume-Specific Survival and Perioperative Outcome: Unmet Need for Evidence in Gynecologic Malignancy
title_fullStr Minimally Invasive Surgery and Surgical Volume-Specific Survival and Perioperative Outcome: Unmet Need for Evidence in Gynecologic Malignancy
title_full_unstemmed Minimally Invasive Surgery and Surgical Volume-Specific Survival and Perioperative Outcome: Unmet Need for Evidence in Gynecologic Malignancy
title_short Minimally Invasive Surgery and Surgical Volume-Specific Survival and Perioperative Outcome: Unmet Need for Evidence in Gynecologic Malignancy
title_sort minimally invasive surgery and surgical volume-specific survival and perioperative outcome: unmet need for evidence in gynecologic malignancy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8537091/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34682910
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10204787
work_keys_str_mv AT matsuzakishinya minimallyinvasivesurgeryandsurgicalvolumespecificsurvivalandperioperativeoutcomeunmetneedforevidenceingynecologicmalignancy
AT klarmaximilian minimallyinvasivesurgeryandsurgicalvolumespecificsurvivalandperioperativeoutcomeunmetneedforevidenceingynecologicmalignancy
AT changericaj minimallyinvasivesurgeryandsurgicalvolumespecificsurvivalandperioperativeoutcomeunmetneedforevidenceingynecologicmalignancy
AT matsuzakisatoko minimallyinvasivesurgeryandsurgicalvolumespecificsurvivalandperioperativeoutcomeunmetneedforevidenceingynecologicmalignancy
AT maedamichihide minimallyinvasivesurgeryandsurgicalvolumespecificsurvivalandperioperativeoutcomeunmetneedforevidenceingynecologicmalignancy
AT zhangreneeh minimallyinvasivesurgeryandsurgicalvolumespecificsurvivalandperioperativeoutcomeunmetneedforevidenceingynecologicmalignancy
AT romanlyndad minimallyinvasivesurgeryandsurgicalvolumespecificsurvivalandperioperativeoutcomeunmetneedforevidenceingynecologicmalignancy
AT matsuokoji minimallyinvasivesurgeryandsurgicalvolumespecificsurvivalandperioperativeoutcomeunmetneedforevidenceingynecologicmalignancy