Cargando…
Synthetic Material for Bone, Periodontal, and Dental Tissue Regeneration: Where Are We Now, and Where Are We Heading Next?
Alloplasts are synthetic, inorganic, biocompatible bone substitutes that function as defect fillers to repair skeletal defects. The acceptance of these substitutes by host tissues is determined by the pore diameter and the porosity and inter-connectivity. This narrative review appraises recent devel...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8537464/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34683712 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14206123 |
_version_ | 1784588257686716416 |
---|---|
author | Cheah, Chia Wei Al-Namnam, Nisreen Mohammed Lau, May Nak Lim, Ghee Seong Raman, Renukanth Fairbairn, Peter Ngeow, Wei Cheong |
author_facet | Cheah, Chia Wei Al-Namnam, Nisreen Mohammed Lau, May Nak Lim, Ghee Seong Raman, Renukanth Fairbairn, Peter Ngeow, Wei Cheong |
author_sort | Cheah, Chia Wei |
collection | PubMed |
description | Alloplasts are synthetic, inorganic, biocompatible bone substitutes that function as defect fillers to repair skeletal defects. The acceptance of these substitutes by host tissues is determined by the pore diameter and the porosity and inter-connectivity. This narrative review appraises recent developments, characterization, and biological performance of different synthetic materials for bone, periodontal, and dental tissue regeneration. They include calcium phosphate cements and their variants β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) ceramics and biphasic calcium phosphates (hydroxyapatite (HA) and β-TCP ceramics), calcium sulfate, bioactive glasses and polymer-based bone substitutes which include variants of polycaprolactone. In summary, the search for synthetic bone substitutes remains elusive with calcium compounds providing the best synthetic substitute. The combination of calcium sulphate and β-TCP provides improved handling of the materials, dispensing with the need for a traditional membrane in guided bone regeneration. Evidence is supportive of improved angiogenesis at the recipient sites. One such product, (EthOss(®) Regeneration, Silesden, UK) has won numerous awards internationally as a commercial success. Bioglasses and polymers, which have been used as medical devices, are still in the experimental stage for dental application. Polycaprolactone-TCP, one of the products in this category is currently undergoing further randomized clinical trials as a 3D socket preservation filler. These aforementioned products may have vast potential for substituting human/animal-based bone grafts. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8537464 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85374642021-10-24 Synthetic Material for Bone, Periodontal, and Dental Tissue Regeneration: Where Are We Now, and Where Are We Heading Next? Cheah, Chia Wei Al-Namnam, Nisreen Mohammed Lau, May Nak Lim, Ghee Seong Raman, Renukanth Fairbairn, Peter Ngeow, Wei Cheong Materials (Basel) Review Alloplasts are synthetic, inorganic, biocompatible bone substitutes that function as defect fillers to repair skeletal defects. The acceptance of these substitutes by host tissues is determined by the pore diameter and the porosity and inter-connectivity. This narrative review appraises recent developments, characterization, and biological performance of different synthetic materials for bone, periodontal, and dental tissue regeneration. They include calcium phosphate cements and their variants β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) ceramics and biphasic calcium phosphates (hydroxyapatite (HA) and β-TCP ceramics), calcium sulfate, bioactive glasses and polymer-based bone substitutes which include variants of polycaprolactone. In summary, the search for synthetic bone substitutes remains elusive with calcium compounds providing the best synthetic substitute. The combination of calcium sulphate and β-TCP provides improved handling of the materials, dispensing with the need for a traditional membrane in guided bone regeneration. Evidence is supportive of improved angiogenesis at the recipient sites. One such product, (EthOss(®) Regeneration, Silesden, UK) has won numerous awards internationally as a commercial success. Bioglasses and polymers, which have been used as medical devices, are still in the experimental stage for dental application. Polycaprolactone-TCP, one of the products in this category is currently undergoing further randomized clinical trials as a 3D socket preservation filler. These aforementioned products may have vast potential for substituting human/animal-based bone grafts. MDPI 2021-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8537464/ /pubmed/34683712 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14206123 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Cheah, Chia Wei Al-Namnam, Nisreen Mohammed Lau, May Nak Lim, Ghee Seong Raman, Renukanth Fairbairn, Peter Ngeow, Wei Cheong Synthetic Material for Bone, Periodontal, and Dental Tissue Regeneration: Where Are We Now, and Where Are We Heading Next? |
title | Synthetic Material for Bone, Periodontal, and Dental Tissue Regeneration: Where Are We Now, and Where Are We Heading Next? |
title_full | Synthetic Material for Bone, Periodontal, and Dental Tissue Regeneration: Where Are We Now, and Where Are We Heading Next? |
title_fullStr | Synthetic Material for Bone, Periodontal, and Dental Tissue Regeneration: Where Are We Now, and Where Are We Heading Next? |
title_full_unstemmed | Synthetic Material for Bone, Periodontal, and Dental Tissue Regeneration: Where Are We Now, and Where Are We Heading Next? |
title_short | Synthetic Material for Bone, Periodontal, and Dental Tissue Regeneration: Where Are We Now, and Where Are We Heading Next? |
title_sort | synthetic material for bone, periodontal, and dental tissue regeneration: where are we now, and where are we heading next? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8537464/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34683712 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14206123 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cheahchiawei syntheticmaterialforboneperiodontalanddentaltissueregenerationwherearewenowandwhereareweheadingnext AT alnamnamnisreenmohammed syntheticmaterialforboneperiodontalanddentaltissueregenerationwherearewenowandwhereareweheadingnext AT laumaynak syntheticmaterialforboneperiodontalanddentaltissueregenerationwherearewenowandwhereareweheadingnext AT limgheeseong syntheticmaterialforboneperiodontalanddentaltissueregenerationwherearewenowandwhereareweheadingnext AT ramanrenukanth syntheticmaterialforboneperiodontalanddentaltissueregenerationwherearewenowandwhereareweheadingnext AT fairbairnpeter syntheticmaterialforboneperiodontalanddentaltissueregenerationwherearewenowandwhereareweheadingnext AT ngeowweicheong syntheticmaterialforboneperiodontalanddentaltissueregenerationwherearewenowandwhereareweheadingnext |