Cargando…

Synthetic Material for Bone, Periodontal, and Dental Tissue Regeneration: Where Are We Now, and Where Are We Heading Next?

Alloplasts are synthetic, inorganic, biocompatible bone substitutes that function as defect fillers to repair skeletal defects. The acceptance of these substitutes by host tissues is determined by the pore diameter and the porosity and inter-connectivity. This narrative review appraises recent devel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cheah, Chia Wei, Al-Namnam, Nisreen Mohammed, Lau, May Nak, Lim, Ghee Seong, Raman, Renukanth, Fairbairn, Peter, Ngeow, Wei Cheong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8537464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34683712
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14206123
_version_ 1784588257686716416
author Cheah, Chia Wei
Al-Namnam, Nisreen Mohammed
Lau, May Nak
Lim, Ghee Seong
Raman, Renukanth
Fairbairn, Peter
Ngeow, Wei Cheong
author_facet Cheah, Chia Wei
Al-Namnam, Nisreen Mohammed
Lau, May Nak
Lim, Ghee Seong
Raman, Renukanth
Fairbairn, Peter
Ngeow, Wei Cheong
author_sort Cheah, Chia Wei
collection PubMed
description Alloplasts are synthetic, inorganic, biocompatible bone substitutes that function as defect fillers to repair skeletal defects. The acceptance of these substitutes by host tissues is determined by the pore diameter and the porosity and inter-connectivity. This narrative review appraises recent developments, characterization, and biological performance of different synthetic materials for bone, periodontal, and dental tissue regeneration. They include calcium phosphate cements and their variants β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) ceramics and biphasic calcium phosphates (hydroxyapatite (HA) and β-TCP ceramics), calcium sulfate, bioactive glasses and polymer-based bone substitutes which include variants of polycaprolactone. In summary, the search for synthetic bone substitutes remains elusive with calcium compounds providing the best synthetic substitute. The combination of calcium sulphate and β-TCP provides improved handling of the materials, dispensing with the need for a traditional membrane in guided bone regeneration. Evidence is supportive of improved angiogenesis at the recipient sites. One such product, (EthOss(®) Regeneration, Silesden, UK) has won numerous awards internationally as a commercial success. Bioglasses and polymers, which have been used as medical devices, are still in the experimental stage for dental application. Polycaprolactone-TCP, one of the products in this category is currently undergoing further randomized clinical trials as a 3D socket preservation filler. These aforementioned products may have vast potential for substituting human/animal-based bone grafts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8537464
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85374642021-10-24 Synthetic Material for Bone, Periodontal, and Dental Tissue Regeneration: Where Are We Now, and Where Are We Heading Next? Cheah, Chia Wei Al-Namnam, Nisreen Mohammed Lau, May Nak Lim, Ghee Seong Raman, Renukanth Fairbairn, Peter Ngeow, Wei Cheong Materials (Basel) Review Alloplasts are synthetic, inorganic, biocompatible bone substitutes that function as defect fillers to repair skeletal defects. The acceptance of these substitutes by host tissues is determined by the pore diameter and the porosity and inter-connectivity. This narrative review appraises recent developments, characterization, and biological performance of different synthetic materials for bone, periodontal, and dental tissue regeneration. They include calcium phosphate cements and their variants β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) ceramics and biphasic calcium phosphates (hydroxyapatite (HA) and β-TCP ceramics), calcium sulfate, bioactive glasses and polymer-based bone substitutes which include variants of polycaprolactone. In summary, the search for synthetic bone substitutes remains elusive with calcium compounds providing the best synthetic substitute. The combination of calcium sulphate and β-TCP provides improved handling of the materials, dispensing with the need for a traditional membrane in guided bone regeneration. Evidence is supportive of improved angiogenesis at the recipient sites. One such product, (EthOss(®) Regeneration, Silesden, UK) has won numerous awards internationally as a commercial success. Bioglasses and polymers, which have been used as medical devices, are still in the experimental stage for dental application. Polycaprolactone-TCP, one of the products in this category is currently undergoing further randomized clinical trials as a 3D socket preservation filler. These aforementioned products may have vast potential for substituting human/animal-based bone grafts. MDPI 2021-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8537464/ /pubmed/34683712 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14206123 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Cheah, Chia Wei
Al-Namnam, Nisreen Mohammed
Lau, May Nak
Lim, Ghee Seong
Raman, Renukanth
Fairbairn, Peter
Ngeow, Wei Cheong
Synthetic Material for Bone, Periodontal, and Dental Tissue Regeneration: Where Are We Now, and Where Are We Heading Next?
title Synthetic Material for Bone, Periodontal, and Dental Tissue Regeneration: Where Are We Now, and Where Are We Heading Next?
title_full Synthetic Material for Bone, Periodontal, and Dental Tissue Regeneration: Where Are We Now, and Where Are We Heading Next?
title_fullStr Synthetic Material for Bone, Periodontal, and Dental Tissue Regeneration: Where Are We Now, and Where Are We Heading Next?
title_full_unstemmed Synthetic Material for Bone, Periodontal, and Dental Tissue Regeneration: Where Are We Now, and Where Are We Heading Next?
title_short Synthetic Material for Bone, Periodontal, and Dental Tissue Regeneration: Where Are We Now, and Where Are We Heading Next?
title_sort synthetic material for bone, periodontal, and dental tissue regeneration: where are we now, and where are we heading next?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8537464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34683712
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14206123
work_keys_str_mv AT cheahchiawei syntheticmaterialforboneperiodontalanddentaltissueregenerationwherearewenowandwhereareweheadingnext
AT alnamnamnisreenmohammed syntheticmaterialforboneperiodontalanddentaltissueregenerationwherearewenowandwhereareweheadingnext
AT laumaynak syntheticmaterialforboneperiodontalanddentaltissueregenerationwherearewenowandwhereareweheadingnext
AT limgheeseong syntheticmaterialforboneperiodontalanddentaltissueregenerationwherearewenowandwhereareweheadingnext
AT ramanrenukanth syntheticmaterialforboneperiodontalanddentaltissueregenerationwherearewenowandwhereareweheadingnext
AT fairbairnpeter syntheticmaterialforboneperiodontalanddentaltissueregenerationwherearewenowandwhereareweheadingnext
AT ngeowweicheong syntheticmaterialforboneperiodontalanddentaltissueregenerationwherearewenowandwhereareweheadingnext