Cargando…
A neuronal mechanism controlling the choice between feeding and sexual behaviors in Drosophila
Animals must express the appropriate behavior that meets their most pressing physiological needs and their environmental context. However, it is currently unclear how alternative behavioral options are evaluated and appropriate actions are prioritized. Here, we describe how fruit flies choose betwee...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cell Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8538064/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34358444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2021.07.029 |
_version_ | 1784588418336948224 |
---|---|
author | Cheriyamkunnel, Sherry J. Rose, Saloni Jacob, Pedro F. Blackburn, Lauren A. Glasgow, Shaleen Moorse, Jacob Winstanley, Mike Moynihan, Patrick J. Waddell, Scott Rezaval, Carolina |
author_facet | Cheriyamkunnel, Sherry J. Rose, Saloni Jacob, Pedro F. Blackburn, Lauren A. Glasgow, Shaleen Moorse, Jacob Winstanley, Mike Moynihan, Patrick J. Waddell, Scott Rezaval, Carolina |
author_sort | Cheriyamkunnel, Sherry J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Animals must express the appropriate behavior that meets their most pressing physiological needs and their environmental context. However, it is currently unclear how alternative behavioral options are evaluated and appropriate actions are prioritized. Here, we describe how fruit flies choose between feeding and courtship; two behaviors necessary for survival and reproduction. We show that sex- and food-deprived male flies prioritize feeding over courtship initiation, and manipulation of food quality or the animal’s internal state fine-tunes this decision. We identify the tyramine signaling pathway as an essential mediator of this decision. Tyramine biosynthesis is regulated by the fly’s nutritional state and acts as a satiety signal, favoring courtship over feeding. Tyramine inhibits a subset of feeding-promoting tyramine receptor (TyrR)-expressing neurons and activates P1 neurons, a known command center for courtship. Conversely, the perception of a nutritious food source activates TyrR neurons and inhibits P1 neurons. Therefore, TyrR and P1 neurons are oppositely modulated by starvation, via tyramine levels, and food availability. We propose that antagonistic co-regulation of neurons controlling alternative actions is key to prioritizing competing drives in a context- dependent manner. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8538064 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Cell Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85380642021-10-29 A neuronal mechanism controlling the choice between feeding and sexual behaviors in Drosophila Cheriyamkunnel, Sherry J. Rose, Saloni Jacob, Pedro F. Blackburn, Lauren A. Glasgow, Shaleen Moorse, Jacob Winstanley, Mike Moynihan, Patrick J. Waddell, Scott Rezaval, Carolina Curr Biol Article Animals must express the appropriate behavior that meets their most pressing physiological needs and their environmental context. However, it is currently unclear how alternative behavioral options are evaluated and appropriate actions are prioritized. Here, we describe how fruit flies choose between feeding and courtship; two behaviors necessary for survival and reproduction. We show that sex- and food-deprived male flies prioritize feeding over courtship initiation, and manipulation of food quality or the animal’s internal state fine-tunes this decision. We identify the tyramine signaling pathway as an essential mediator of this decision. Tyramine biosynthesis is regulated by the fly’s nutritional state and acts as a satiety signal, favoring courtship over feeding. Tyramine inhibits a subset of feeding-promoting tyramine receptor (TyrR)-expressing neurons and activates P1 neurons, a known command center for courtship. Conversely, the perception of a nutritious food source activates TyrR neurons and inhibits P1 neurons. Therefore, TyrR and P1 neurons are oppositely modulated by starvation, via tyramine levels, and food availability. We propose that antagonistic co-regulation of neurons controlling alternative actions is key to prioritizing competing drives in a context- dependent manner. Cell Press 2021-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8538064/ /pubmed/34358444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2021.07.029 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Cheriyamkunnel, Sherry J. Rose, Saloni Jacob, Pedro F. Blackburn, Lauren A. Glasgow, Shaleen Moorse, Jacob Winstanley, Mike Moynihan, Patrick J. Waddell, Scott Rezaval, Carolina A neuronal mechanism controlling the choice between feeding and sexual behaviors in Drosophila |
title | A neuronal mechanism controlling the choice between feeding and sexual behaviors in Drosophila |
title_full | A neuronal mechanism controlling the choice between feeding and sexual behaviors in Drosophila |
title_fullStr | A neuronal mechanism controlling the choice between feeding and sexual behaviors in Drosophila |
title_full_unstemmed | A neuronal mechanism controlling the choice between feeding and sexual behaviors in Drosophila |
title_short | A neuronal mechanism controlling the choice between feeding and sexual behaviors in Drosophila |
title_sort | neuronal mechanism controlling the choice between feeding and sexual behaviors in drosophila |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8538064/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34358444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2021.07.029 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cheriyamkunnelsherryj aneuronalmechanismcontrollingthechoicebetweenfeedingandsexualbehaviorsindrosophila AT rosesaloni aneuronalmechanismcontrollingthechoicebetweenfeedingandsexualbehaviorsindrosophila AT jacobpedrof aneuronalmechanismcontrollingthechoicebetweenfeedingandsexualbehaviorsindrosophila AT blackburnlaurena aneuronalmechanismcontrollingthechoicebetweenfeedingandsexualbehaviorsindrosophila AT glasgowshaleen aneuronalmechanismcontrollingthechoicebetweenfeedingandsexualbehaviorsindrosophila AT moorsejacob aneuronalmechanismcontrollingthechoicebetweenfeedingandsexualbehaviorsindrosophila AT winstanleymike aneuronalmechanismcontrollingthechoicebetweenfeedingandsexualbehaviorsindrosophila AT moynihanpatrickj aneuronalmechanismcontrollingthechoicebetweenfeedingandsexualbehaviorsindrosophila AT waddellscott aneuronalmechanismcontrollingthechoicebetweenfeedingandsexualbehaviorsindrosophila AT rezavalcarolina aneuronalmechanismcontrollingthechoicebetweenfeedingandsexualbehaviorsindrosophila AT cheriyamkunnelsherryj neuronalmechanismcontrollingthechoicebetweenfeedingandsexualbehaviorsindrosophila AT rosesaloni neuronalmechanismcontrollingthechoicebetweenfeedingandsexualbehaviorsindrosophila AT jacobpedrof neuronalmechanismcontrollingthechoicebetweenfeedingandsexualbehaviorsindrosophila AT blackburnlaurena neuronalmechanismcontrollingthechoicebetweenfeedingandsexualbehaviorsindrosophila AT glasgowshaleen neuronalmechanismcontrollingthechoicebetweenfeedingandsexualbehaviorsindrosophila AT moorsejacob neuronalmechanismcontrollingthechoicebetweenfeedingandsexualbehaviorsindrosophila AT winstanleymike neuronalmechanismcontrollingthechoicebetweenfeedingandsexualbehaviorsindrosophila AT moynihanpatrickj neuronalmechanismcontrollingthechoicebetweenfeedingandsexualbehaviorsindrosophila AT waddellscott neuronalmechanismcontrollingthechoicebetweenfeedingandsexualbehaviorsindrosophila AT rezavalcarolina neuronalmechanismcontrollingthechoicebetweenfeedingandsexualbehaviorsindrosophila |