Cargando…
Effect of different surface treatments on surface roughness, phase transformation, and biaxial flexural strength of dental zirconia
Background. Interfacial failures at the cement‒restoration interface highlights the importance of effective surface treatment with no adverse effect on the zirconia’s mechanical properties. This study aimed to determine the effect of different surface treatments on dental graded zirconia’s surface r...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8538149/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34712413 http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/joddd.2021.035 |
_version_ | 1784588436378746880 |
---|---|
author | Yahyazadehfar, Niknaz Azimi Zavaree, Maryam Shayegh, Sayed Shojaedin Yahyazadehfar, Mobin Hooshmand, Tabassom Hakimaneh, Seyed Mohammad Reza |
author_facet | Yahyazadehfar, Niknaz Azimi Zavaree, Maryam Shayegh, Sayed Shojaedin Yahyazadehfar, Mobin Hooshmand, Tabassom Hakimaneh, Seyed Mohammad Reza |
author_sort | Yahyazadehfar, Niknaz |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background. Interfacial failures at the cement‒restoration interface highlights the importance of effective surface treatment with no adverse effect on the zirconia’s mechanical properties. This study aimed to determine the effect of different surface treatments on dental graded zirconia’s surface roughness and certain mechanical properties. Methods. Forty sintered zirconia specimens were randomly divided into four groups (n=10): control (no surface treatment), sandblasting (SA), grinding with diamond bur (GB), and Er,Cr:YSGG laser (LS). Following surface treatment, the surface roughness and surface topography of the specimens were examined. X-ray diffraction (XRD) was conducted. In addition, the biaxial flexural strengths of specimens were evaluated. The data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc Tukey tests; the Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated between either volumetric percentage of monoclinic phase or roughness and flexural strength of specimens (α=0.05). Results. The GB group exhibited significantly greater surface roughness compared to the other groups (P < 0.005). The LS and control groups exhibited a significantly lower volumetric percentage of the monoclinic phase (P < 0.001) than the GB and SA treatments. The SA group exhibited significantly higher flexural strength than the control (P = 0.02) and GB groups (P < 0.01). Furthermore, the Weibull analysis for the LS showed higher reliability for the flexural strength than other treatments. Conclusion. Er,Cr:YSGG laser treatment, with the lowest extent of phase transformation and reliable flexural strength, can be a promising choice for surface treatment of zirconia. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8538149 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Tabriz University of Medical Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85381492021-10-27 Effect of different surface treatments on surface roughness, phase transformation, and biaxial flexural strength of dental zirconia Yahyazadehfar, Niknaz Azimi Zavaree, Maryam Shayegh, Sayed Shojaedin Yahyazadehfar, Mobin Hooshmand, Tabassom Hakimaneh, Seyed Mohammad Reza J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects Original Article Background. Interfacial failures at the cement‒restoration interface highlights the importance of effective surface treatment with no adverse effect on the zirconia’s mechanical properties. This study aimed to determine the effect of different surface treatments on dental graded zirconia’s surface roughness and certain mechanical properties. Methods. Forty sintered zirconia specimens were randomly divided into four groups (n=10): control (no surface treatment), sandblasting (SA), grinding with diamond bur (GB), and Er,Cr:YSGG laser (LS). Following surface treatment, the surface roughness and surface topography of the specimens were examined. X-ray diffraction (XRD) was conducted. In addition, the biaxial flexural strengths of specimens were evaluated. The data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc Tukey tests; the Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated between either volumetric percentage of monoclinic phase or roughness and flexural strength of specimens (α=0.05). Results. The GB group exhibited significantly greater surface roughness compared to the other groups (P < 0.005). The LS and control groups exhibited a significantly lower volumetric percentage of the monoclinic phase (P < 0.001) than the GB and SA treatments. The SA group exhibited significantly higher flexural strength than the control (P = 0.02) and GB groups (P < 0.01). Furthermore, the Weibull analysis for the LS showed higher reliability for the flexural strength than other treatments. Conclusion. Er,Cr:YSGG laser treatment, with the lowest extent of phase transformation and reliable flexural strength, can be a promising choice for surface treatment of zirconia. Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2021 2021-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8538149/ /pubmed/34712413 http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/joddd.2021.035 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Yahyazadehfar, Niknaz Azimi Zavaree, Maryam Shayegh, Sayed Shojaedin Yahyazadehfar, Mobin Hooshmand, Tabassom Hakimaneh, Seyed Mohammad Reza Effect of different surface treatments on surface roughness, phase transformation, and biaxial flexural strength of dental zirconia |
title | Effect of different surface treatments on surface roughness, phase transformation, and biaxial flexural strength of dental zirconia |
title_full | Effect of different surface treatments on surface roughness, phase transformation, and biaxial flexural strength of dental zirconia |
title_fullStr | Effect of different surface treatments on surface roughness, phase transformation, and biaxial flexural strength of dental zirconia |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of different surface treatments on surface roughness, phase transformation, and biaxial flexural strength of dental zirconia |
title_short | Effect of different surface treatments on surface roughness, phase transformation, and biaxial flexural strength of dental zirconia |
title_sort | effect of different surface treatments on surface roughness, phase transformation, and biaxial flexural strength of dental zirconia |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8538149/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34712413 http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/joddd.2021.035 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yahyazadehfarniknaz effectofdifferentsurfacetreatmentsonsurfaceroughnessphasetransformationandbiaxialflexuralstrengthofdentalzirconia AT azimizavareemaryam effectofdifferentsurfacetreatmentsonsurfaceroughnessphasetransformationandbiaxialflexuralstrengthofdentalzirconia AT shayeghsayedshojaedin effectofdifferentsurfacetreatmentsonsurfaceroughnessphasetransformationandbiaxialflexuralstrengthofdentalzirconia AT yahyazadehfarmobin effectofdifferentsurfacetreatmentsonsurfaceroughnessphasetransformationandbiaxialflexuralstrengthofdentalzirconia AT hooshmandtabassom effectofdifferentsurfacetreatmentsonsurfaceroughnessphasetransformationandbiaxialflexuralstrengthofdentalzirconia AT hakimanehseyedmohammadreza effectofdifferentsurfacetreatmentsonsurfaceroughnessphasetransformationandbiaxialflexuralstrengthofdentalzirconia |