Cargando…

Effect of different surface treatments on surface roughness, phase transformation, and biaxial flexural strength of dental zirconia

Background. Interfacial failures at the cement‒restoration interface highlights the importance of effective surface treatment with no adverse effect on the zirconia’s mechanical properties. This study aimed to determine the effect of different surface treatments on dental graded zirconia’s surface r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yahyazadehfar, Niknaz, Azimi Zavaree, Maryam, Shayegh, Sayed Shojaedin, Yahyazadehfar, Mobin, Hooshmand, Tabassom, Hakimaneh, Seyed Mohammad Reza
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8538149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34712413
http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/joddd.2021.035
_version_ 1784588436378746880
author Yahyazadehfar, Niknaz
Azimi Zavaree, Maryam
Shayegh, Sayed Shojaedin
Yahyazadehfar, Mobin
Hooshmand, Tabassom
Hakimaneh, Seyed Mohammad Reza
author_facet Yahyazadehfar, Niknaz
Azimi Zavaree, Maryam
Shayegh, Sayed Shojaedin
Yahyazadehfar, Mobin
Hooshmand, Tabassom
Hakimaneh, Seyed Mohammad Reza
author_sort Yahyazadehfar, Niknaz
collection PubMed
description Background. Interfacial failures at the cement‒restoration interface highlights the importance of effective surface treatment with no adverse effect on the zirconia’s mechanical properties. This study aimed to determine the effect of different surface treatments on dental graded zirconia’s surface roughness and certain mechanical properties. Methods. Forty sintered zirconia specimens were randomly divided into four groups (n=10): control (no surface treatment), sandblasting (SA), grinding with diamond bur (GB), and Er,Cr:YSGG laser (LS). Following surface treatment, the surface roughness and surface topography of the specimens were examined. X-ray diffraction (XRD) was conducted. In addition, the biaxial flexural strengths of specimens were evaluated. The data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc Tukey tests; the Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated between either volumetric percentage of monoclinic phase or roughness and flexural strength of specimens (α=0.05). Results. The GB group exhibited significantly greater surface roughness compared to the other groups (P < 0.005). The LS and control groups exhibited a significantly lower volumetric percentage of the monoclinic phase (P < 0.001) than the GB and SA treatments. The SA group exhibited significantly higher flexural strength than the control (P = 0.02) and GB groups (P < 0.01). Furthermore, the Weibull analysis for the LS showed higher reliability for the flexural strength than other treatments. Conclusion. Er,Cr:YSGG laser treatment, with the lowest extent of phase transformation and reliable flexural strength, can be a promising choice for surface treatment of zirconia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8538149
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85381492021-10-27 Effect of different surface treatments on surface roughness, phase transformation, and biaxial flexural strength of dental zirconia Yahyazadehfar, Niknaz Azimi Zavaree, Maryam Shayegh, Sayed Shojaedin Yahyazadehfar, Mobin Hooshmand, Tabassom Hakimaneh, Seyed Mohammad Reza J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects Original Article Background. Interfacial failures at the cement‒restoration interface highlights the importance of effective surface treatment with no adverse effect on the zirconia’s mechanical properties. This study aimed to determine the effect of different surface treatments on dental graded zirconia’s surface roughness and certain mechanical properties. Methods. Forty sintered zirconia specimens were randomly divided into four groups (n=10): control (no surface treatment), sandblasting (SA), grinding with diamond bur (GB), and Er,Cr:YSGG laser (LS). Following surface treatment, the surface roughness and surface topography of the specimens were examined. X-ray diffraction (XRD) was conducted. In addition, the biaxial flexural strengths of specimens were evaluated. The data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc Tukey tests; the Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated between either volumetric percentage of monoclinic phase or roughness and flexural strength of specimens (α=0.05). Results. The GB group exhibited significantly greater surface roughness compared to the other groups (P < 0.005). The LS and control groups exhibited a significantly lower volumetric percentage of the monoclinic phase (P < 0.001) than the GB and SA treatments. The SA group exhibited significantly higher flexural strength than the control (P = 0.02) and GB groups (P < 0.01). Furthermore, the Weibull analysis for the LS showed higher reliability for the flexural strength than other treatments. Conclusion. Er,Cr:YSGG laser treatment, with the lowest extent of phase transformation and reliable flexural strength, can be a promising choice for surface treatment of zirconia. Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2021 2021-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8538149/ /pubmed/34712413 http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/joddd.2021.035 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Yahyazadehfar, Niknaz
Azimi Zavaree, Maryam
Shayegh, Sayed Shojaedin
Yahyazadehfar, Mobin
Hooshmand, Tabassom
Hakimaneh, Seyed Mohammad Reza
Effect of different surface treatments on surface roughness, phase transformation, and biaxial flexural strength of dental zirconia
title Effect of different surface treatments on surface roughness, phase transformation, and biaxial flexural strength of dental zirconia
title_full Effect of different surface treatments on surface roughness, phase transformation, and biaxial flexural strength of dental zirconia
title_fullStr Effect of different surface treatments on surface roughness, phase transformation, and biaxial flexural strength of dental zirconia
title_full_unstemmed Effect of different surface treatments on surface roughness, phase transformation, and biaxial flexural strength of dental zirconia
title_short Effect of different surface treatments on surface roughness, phase transformation, and biaxial flexural strength of dental zirconia
title_sort effect of different surface treatments on surface roughness, phase transformation, and biaxial flexural strength of dental zirconia
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8538149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34712413
http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/joddd.2021.035
work_keys_str_mv AT yahyazadehfarniknaz effectofdifferentsurfacetreatmentsonsurfaceroughnessphasetransformationandbiaxialflexuralstrengthofdentalzirconia
AT azimizavareemaryam effectofdifferentsurfacetreatmentsonsurfaceroughnessphasetransformationandbiaxialflexuralstrengthofdentalzirconia
AT shayeghsayedshojaedin effectofdifferentsurfacetreatmentsonsurfaceroughnessphasetransformationandbiaxialflexuralstrengthofdentalzirconia
AT yahyazadehfarmobin effectofdifferentsurfacetreatmentsonsurfaceroughnessphasetransformationandbiaxialflexuralstrengthofdentalzirconia
AT hooshmandtabassom effectofdifferentsurfacetreatmentsonsurfaceroughnessphasetransformationandbiaxialflexuralstrengthofdentalzirconia
AT hakimanehseyedmohammadreza effectofdifferentsurfacetreatmentsonsurfaceroughnessphasetransformationandbiaxialflexuralstrengthofdentalzirconia