Cargando…
Shared Care and Virtual Clinics for Glaucoma in a Hospital Setting
Glaucoma patients require lifelong management, and the prevalence of glaucoma is expected to increase, resulting in capacity problems in many hospital eye departments. New models of care delivery are needed to offer requisite capacity. This review evaluates two alternative schemes for glaucoma care...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8538177/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34682908 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10204785 |
_version_ | 1784588442960658432 |
---|---|
author | Simons, Anne-Sophie Vercauteren, Julie Barbosa-Breda, João Stalmans, Ingeborg |
author_facet | Simons, Anne-Sophie Vercauteren, Julie Barbosa-Breda, João Stalmans, Ingeborg |
author_sort | Simons, Anne-Sophie |
collection | PubMed |
description | Glaucoma patients require lifelong management, and the prevalence of glaucoma is expected to increase, resulting in capacity problems in many hospital eye departments. New models of care delivery are needed to offer requisite capacity. This review evaluates two alternative schemes for glaucoma care within a hospital, i.e., shared care (SC) and virtual clinics (VCs), whereby non-medical staff are entrusted with more responsibilities, and compares these schemes with the “traditional” ophthalmologist-led outpatient service (standard care). A literature search was conducted in three large bibliographic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Trip), and the abstracts from the prior five annual meetings of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology were consulted. Twenty-nine were included in the review (14 on SC and 15 on VCs). Patients with low risk of vision loss were considered suitable for these approaches. Among the non-medical staff, optometrists were the most frequently involved. The quality of both schemes was good and improved with the non-medical staff being trained in glaucoma care. No evidence was found on patients feeling disadvantaged by the lack of a doctor visit. Both schemes increased the hospital’s efficiency. Both SC and VCs are promising approaches to tackle the upcoming capacity problems of hospital-based glaucoma care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8538177 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85381772021-10-24 Shared Care and Virtual Clinics for Glaucoma in a Hospital Setting Simons, Anne-Sophie Vercauteren, Julie Barbosa-Breda, João Stalmans, Ingeborg J Clin Med Review Glaucoma patients require lifelong management, and the prevalence of glaucoma is expected to increase, resulting in capacity problems in many hospital eye departments. New models of care delivery are needed to offer requisite capacity. This review evaluates two alternative schemes for glaucoma care within a hospital, i.e., shared care (SC) and virtual clinics (VCs), whereby non-medical staff are entrusted with more responsibilities, and compares these schemes with the “traditional” ophthalmologist-led outpatient service (standard care). A literature search was conducted in three large bibliographic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Trip), and the abstracts from the prior five annual meetings of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology were consulted. Twenty-nine were included in the review (14 on SC and 15 on VCs). Patients with low risk of vision loss were considered suitable for these approaches. Among the non-medical staff, optometrists were the most frequently involved. The quality of both schemes was good and improved with the non-medical staff being trained in glaucoma care. No evidence was found on patients feeling disadvantaged by the lack of a doctor visit. Both schemes increased the hospital’s efficiency. Both SC and VCs are promising approaches to tackle the upcoming capacity problems of hospital-based glaucoma care. MDPI 2021-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8538177/ /pubmed/34682908 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10204785 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Simons, Anne-Sophie Vercauteren, Julie Barbosa-Breda, João Stalmans, Ingeborg Shared Care and Virtual Clinics for Glaucoma in a Hospital Setting |
title | Shared Care and Virtual Clinics for Glaucoma in a Hospital Setting |
title_full | Shared Care and Virtual Clinics for Glaucoma in a Hospital Setting |
title_fullStr | Shared Care and Virtual Clinics for Glaucoma in a Hospital Setting |
title_full_unstemmed | Shared Care and Virtual Clinics for Glaucoma in a Hospital Setting |
title_short | Shared Care and Virtual Clinics for Glaucoma in a Hospital Setting |
title_sort | shared care and virtual clinics for glaucoma in a hospital setting |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8538177/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34682908 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10204785 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT simonsannesophie sharedcareandvirtualclinicsforglaucomainahospitalsetting AT vercauterenjulie sharedcareandvirtualclinicsforglaucomainahospitalsetting AT barbosabredajoao sharedcareandvirtualclinicsforglaucomainahospitalsetting AT stalmansingeborg sharedcareandvirtualclinicsforglaucomainahospitalsetting |