Cargando…

Coinfection and Interference Phenomena Are the Results of Multiple Thermodynamic Competitive Interactions

Biological, physical and chemical interaction between one (or more) microorganisms and a host organism, causing host cell damage, represents an infection. Infection of a plant, animal or microorganism with a virus can prevent infection with another virus. This phenomenon is known as viral interferen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Popovic, Marko, Minceva, Mirjana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8538544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34683381
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9102060
_version_ 1784588531526533120
author Popovic, Marko
Minceva, Mirjana
author_facet Popovic, Marko
Minceva, Mirjana
author_sort Popovic, Marko
collection PubMed
description Biological, physical and chemical interaction between one (or more) microorganisms and a host organism, causing host cell damage, represents an infection. Infection of a plant, animal or microorganism with a virus can prevent infection with another virus. This phenomenon is known as viral interference. Viral interference is shown to result from two types of interactions, one taking place at the cell surface and the other intracellularly. Various viruses use different receptors to enter the same host cell, but various strains of one virus use the same receptor. The rate of virus–receptor binding can vary between different viruses attacking the same host, allowing interference or coinfection. The outcome of the virus–virus–host competition is determined by the Gibbs energies of binding and growth of the competing viruses and host. The virus with a more negative Gibbs energy of binding to the host cell receptor will enter the host first, while the virus characterized by a more negative Gibbs energy of growth will overtake the host metabolic machine and dominate. Once in the host cell, the multiplication machinery is shared by the competing viruses. Their potential to utilize it depends on the Gibbs energy of growth. Thus, the virus with a more negative Gibbs energy of growth will dominate. Therefore, the outcome can be interference or coinfection, depending on both the attachment kinetics (susceptibility) and the intracellular multiplication machinery (permittivity). The ratios of the Gibbs energies of binding and growth of the competing viruses determine the outcome of the competition. Based on this, a predictive model of virus–virus competition is proposed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8538544
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85385442021-10-24 Coinfection and Interference Phenomena Are the Results of Multiple Thermodynamic Competitive Interactions Popovic, Marko Minceva, Mirjana Microorganisms Article Biological, physical and chemical interaction between one (or more) microorganisms and a host organism, causing host cell damage, represents an infection. Infection of a plant, animal or microorganism with a virus can prevent infection with another virus. This phenomenon is known as viral interference. Viral interference is shown to result from two types of interactions, one taking place at the cell surface and the other intracellularly. Various viruses use different receptors to enter the same host cell, but various strains of one virus use the same receptor. The rate of virus–receptor binding can vary between different viruses attacking the same host, allowing interference or coinfection. The outcome of the virus–virus–host competition is determined by the Gibbs energies of binding and growth of the competing viruses and host. The virus with a more negative Gibbs energy of binding to the host cell receptor will enter the host first, while the virus characterized by a more negative Gibbs energy of growth will overtake the host metabolic machine and dominate. Once in the host cell, the multiplication machinery is shared by the competing viruses. Their potential to utilize it depends on the Gibbs energy of growth. Thus, the virus with a more negative Gibbs energy of growth will dominate. Therefore, the outcome can be interference or coinfection, depending on both the attachment kinetics (susceptibility) and the intracellular multiplication machinery (permittivity). The ratios of the Gibbs energies of binding and growth of the competing viruses determine the outcome of the competition. Based on this, a predictive model of virus–virus competition is proposed. MDPI 2021-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8538544/ /pubmed/34683381 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9102060 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Popovic, Marko
Minceva, Mirjana
Coinfection and Interference Phenomena Are the Results of Multiple Thermodynamic Competitive Interactions
title Coinfection and Interference Phenomena Are the Results of Multiple Thermodynamic Competitive Interactions
title_full Coinfection and Interference Phenomena Are the Results of Multiple Thermodynamic Competitive Interactions
title_fullStr Coinfection and Interference Phenomena Are the Results of Multiple Thermodynamic Competitive Interactions
title_full_unstemmed Coinfection and Interference Phenomena Are the Results of Multiple Thermodynamic Competitive Interactions
title_short Coinfection and Interference Phenomena Are the Results of Multiple Thermodynamic Competitive Interactions
title_sort coinfection and interference phenomena are the results of multiple thermodynamic competitive interactions
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8538544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34683381
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9102060
work_keys_str_mv AT popovicmarko coinfectionandinterferencephenomenaaretheresultsofmultiplethermodynamiccompetitiveinteractions
AT mincevamirjana coinfectionandinterferencephenomenaaretheresultsofmultiplethermodynamiccompetitiveinteractions