Cargando…
Coinfection and Interference Phenomena Are the Results of Multiple Thermodynamic Competitive Interactions
Biological, physical and chemical interaction between one (or more) microorganisms and a host organism, causing host cell damage, represents an infection. Infection of a plant, animal or microorganism with a virus can prevent infection with another virus. This phenomenon is known as viral interferen...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8538544/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34683381 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9102060 |
_version_ | 1784588531526533120 |
---|---|
author | Popovic, Marko Minceva, Mirjana |
author_facet | Popovic, Marko Minceva, Mirjana |
author_sort | Popovic, Marko |
collection | PubMed |
description | Biological, physical and chemical interaction between one (or more) microorganisms and a host organism, causing host cell damage, represents an infection. Infection of a plant, animal or microorganism with a virus can prevent infection with another virus. This phenomenon is known as viral interference. Viral interference is shown to result from two types of interactions, one taking place at the cell surface and the other intracellularly. Various viruses use different receptors to enter the same host cell, but various strains of one virus use the same receptor. The rate of virus–receptor binding can vary between different viruses attacking the same host, allowing interference or coinfection. The outcome of the virus–virus–host competition is determined by the Gibbs energies of binding and growth of the competing viruses and host. The virus with a more negative Gibbs energy of binding to the host cell receptor will enter the host first, while the virus characterized by a more negative Gibbs energy of growth will overtake the host metabolic machine and dominate. Once in the host cell, the multiplication machinery is shared by the competing viruses. Their potential to utilize it depends on the Gibbs energy of growth. Thus, the virus with a more negative Gibbs energy of growth will dominate. Therefore, the outcome can be interference or coinfection, depending on both the attachment kinetics (susceptibility) and the intracellular multiplication machinery (permittivity). The ratios of the Gibbs energies of binding and growth of the competing viruses determine the outcome of the competition. Based on this, a predictive model of virus–virus competition is proposed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8538544 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85385442021-10-24 Coinfection and Interference Phenomena Are the Results of Multiple Thermodynamic Competitive Interactions Popovic, Marko Minceva, Mirjana Microorganisms Article Biological, physical and chemical interaction between one (or more) microorganisms and a host organism, causing host cell damage, represents an infection. Infection of a plant, animal or microorganism with a virus can prevent infection with another virus. This phenomenon is known as viral interference. Viral interference is shown to result from two types of interactions, one taking place at the cell surface and the other intracellularly. Various viruses use different receptors to enter the same host cell, but various strains of one virus use the same receptor. The rate of virus–receptor binding can vary between different viruses attacking the same host, allowing interference or coinfection. The outcome of the virus–virus–host competition is determined by the Gibbs energies of binding and growth of the competing viruses and host. The virus with a more negative Gibbs energy of binding to the host cell receptor will enter the host first, while the virus characterized by a more negative Gibbs energy of growth will overtake the host metabolic machine and dominate. Once in the host cell, the multiplication machinery is shared by the competing viruses. Their potential to utilize it depends on the Gibbs energy of growth. Thus, the virus with a more negative Gibbs energy of growth will dominate. Therefore, the outcome can be interference or coinfection, depending on both the attachment kinetics (susceptibility) and the intracellular multiplication machinery (permittivity). The ratios of the Gibbs energies of binding and growth of the competing viruses determine the outcome of the competition. Based on this, a predictive model of virus–virus competition is proposed. MDPI 2021-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8538544/ /pubmed/34683381 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9102060 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Popovic, Marko Minceva, Mirjana Coinfection and Interference Phenomena Are the Results of Multiple Thermodynamic Competitive Interactions |
title | Coinfection and Interference Phenomena Are the Results of Multiple Thermodynamic Competitive Interactions |
title_full | Coinfection and Interference Phenomena Are the Results of Multiple Thermodynamic Competitive Interactions |
title_fullStr | Coinfection and Interference Phenomena Are the Results of Multiple Thermodynamic Competitive Interactions |
title_full_unstemmed | Coinfection and Interference Phenomena Are the Results of Multiple Thermodynamic Competitive Interactions |
title_short | Coinfection and Interference Phenomena Are the Results of Multiple Thermodynamic Competitive Interactions |
title_sort | coinfection and interference phenomena are the results of multiple thermodynamic competitive interactions |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8538544/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34683381 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9102060 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT popovicmarko coinfectionandinterferencephenomenaaretheresultsofmultiplethermodynamiccompetitiveinteractions AT mincevamirjana coinfectionandinterferencephenomenaaretheresultsofmultiplethermodynamiccompetitiveinteractions |