Cargando…

Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty for Severe Aortic Stenosis as Rescue or Bridge Therapy

The study aimed to assess procedural complications, patient flow and clinical outcomes after balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) as rescue or bridge therapy, based on data from our registry. A total of 382 BAVs in 374 patients was performed. The main primary indication for BAV was a bridge for TAVI (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kleczynski, Pawel, Kulbat, Aleksandra, Brzychczy, Piotr, Dziewierz, Artur, Trebacz, Jaroslaw, Stapor, Maciej, Sorysz, Danuta, Rzeszutko, Lukasz, Bartus, Stanislaw, Dudek, Dariusz, Legutko, Jacek
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8538854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34682783
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10204657
_version_ 1784588606481891328
author Kleczynski, Pawel
Kulbat, Aleksandra
Brzychczy, Piotr
Dziewierz, Artur
Trebacz, Jaroslaw
Stapor, Maciej
Sorysz, Danuta
Rzeszutko, Lukasz
Bartus, Stanislaw
Dudek, Dariusz
Legutko, Jacek
author_facet Kleczynski, Pawel
Kulbat, Aleksandra
Brzychczy, Piotr
Dziewierz, Artur
Trebacz, Jaroslaw
Stapor, Maciej
Sorysz, Danuta
Rzeszutko, Lukasz
Bartus, Stanislaw
Dudek, Dariusz
Legutko, Jacek
author_sort Kleczynski, Pawel
collection PubMed
description The study aimed to assess procedural complications, patient flow and clinical outcomes after balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) as rescue or bridge therapy, based on data from our registry. A total of 382 BAVs in 374 patients was performed. The main primary indication for BAV was a bridge for TAVI (n = 185, 49.4%). Other indications included a bridge for AVR (n = 26, 6.9%) and rescue procedure in hemodynamically unstable patients (n = 139, 37.2%). The mortality rate at 30 days, 6 and 12 months was 10.4%, 21.6%, 28.3%, respectively. In rescue patients, the death rate raised to 66.9% at 12 months. A significant improvement in symptoms was confirmed after BAV, after 30 days, 6 months, and in survivors after 1 year (p < 0.05 for all). Independent predictors of 12-month mortality were baseline STS score [HR (95% CI) 1.42 (1.34 to 2.88), p < 0.0001], baseline LVEF <20% [HR (95% CI) 1.89 (1.55–2.83), p < 0.0001] and LVEF <30% at 1 month [HR (95% CI) 1.97 (1.62–3.67), p < 0.0001] adjusted for age/gender. In everyday clinical practice in the TAVI era, there are still clinical indications to BAV a standalone procedure as a bridge to surgery, TAVI or for urgent high risk non-cardiac surgical procedures. Patients may improve clinically after BAV with LV function recovery, allowing to perform final therapy, within limited time window, for severe AS which ameliorates long-term outcomes. On the other hand, in patients for whom an isolated BAV becomes a destination therapy, prognosis is extremely poor.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8538854
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85388542021-10-24 Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty for Severe Aortic Stenosis as Rescue or Bridge Therapy Kleczynski, Pawel Kulbat, Aleksandra Brzychczy, Piotr Dziewierz, Artur Trebacz, Jaroslaw Stapor, Maciej Sorysz, Danuta Rzeszutko, Lukasz Bartus, Stanislaw Dudek, Dariusz Legutko, Jacek J Clin Med Article The study aimed to assess procedural complications, patient flow and clinical outcomes after balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) as rescue or bridge therapy, based on data from our registry. A total of 382 BAVs in 374 patients was performed. The main primary indication for BAV was a bridge for TAVI (n = 185, 49.4%). Other indications included a bridge for AVR (n = 26, 6.9%) and rescue procedure in hemodynamically unstable patients (n = 139, 37.2%). The mortality rate at 30 days, 6 and 12 months was 10.4%, 21.6%, 28.3%, respectively. In rescue patients, the death rate raised to 66.9% at 12 months. A significant improvement in symptoms was confirmed after BAV, after 30 days, 6 months, and in survivors after 1 year (p < 0.05 for all). Independent predictors of 12-month mortality were baseline STS score [HR (95% CI) 1.42 (1.34 to 2.88), p < 0.0001], baseline LVEF <20% [HR (95% CI) 1.89 (1.55–2.83), p < 0.0001] and LVEF <30% at 1 month [HR (95% CI) 1.97 (1.62–3.67), p < 0.0001] adjusted for age/gender. In everyday clinical practice in the TAVI era, there are still clinical indications to BAV a standalone procedure as a bridge to surgery, TAVI or for urgent high risk non-cardiac surgical procedures. Patients may improve clinically after BAV with LV function recovery, allowing to perform final therapy, within limited time window, for severe AS which ameliorates long-term outcomes. On the other hand, in patients for whom an isolated BAV becomes a destination therapy, prognosis is extremely poor. MDPI 2021-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8538854/ /pubmed/34682783 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10204657 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kleczynski, Pawel
Kulbat, Aleksandra
Brzychczy, Piotr
Dziewierz, Artur
Trebacz, Jaroslaw
Stapor, Maciej
Sorysz, Danuta
Rzeszutko, Lukasz
Bartus, Stanislaw
Dudek, Dariusz
Legutko, Jacek
Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty for Severe Aortic Stenosis as Rescue or Bridge Therapy
title Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty for Severe Aortic Stenosis as Rescue or Bridge Therapy
title_full Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty for Severe Aortic Stenosis as Rescue or Bridge Therapy
title_fullStr Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty for Severe Aortic Stenosis as Rescue or Bridge Therapy
title_full_unstemmed Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty for Severe Aortic Stenosis as Rescue or Bridge Therapy
title_short Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty for Severe Aortic Stenosis as Rescue or Bridge Therapy
title_sort balloon aortic valvuloplasty for severe aortic stenosis as rescue or bridge therapy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8538854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34682783
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10204657
work_keys_str_mv AT kleczynskipawel balloonaorticvalvuloplastyforsevereaorticstenosisasrescueorbridgetherapy
AT kulbataleksandra balloonaorticvalvuloplastyforsevereaorticstenosisasrescueorbridgetherapy
AT brzychczypiotr balloonaorticvalvuloplastyforsevereaorticstenosisasrescueorbridgetherapy
AT dziewierzartur balloonaorticvalvuloplastyforsevereaorticstenosisasrescueorbridgetherapy
AT trebaczjaroslaw balloonaorticvalvuloplastyforsevereaorticstenosisasrescueorbridgetherapy
AT stapormaciej balloonaorticvalvuloplastyforsevereaorticstenosisasrescueorbridgetherapy
AT soryszdanuta balloonaorticvalvuloplastyforsevereaorticstenosisasrescueorbridgetherapy
AT rzeszutkolukasz balloonaorticvalvuloplastyforsevereaorticstenosisasrescueorbridgetherapy
AT bartusstanislaw balloonaorticvalvuloplastyforsevereaorticstenosisasrescueorbridgetherapy
AT dudekdariusz balloonaorticvalvuloplastyforsevereaorticstenosisasrescueorbridgetherapy
AT legutkojacek balloonaorticvalvuloplastyforsevereaorticstenosisasrescueorbridgetherapy