Cargando…
Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty for Severe Aortic Stenosis as Rescue or Bridge Therapy
The study aimed to assess procedural complications, patient flow and clinical outcomes after balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) as rescue or bridge therapy, based on data from our registry. A total of 382 BAVs in 374 patients was performed. The main primary indication for BAV was a bridge for TAVI (...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8538854/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34682783 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10204657 |
_version_ | 1784588606481891328 |
---|---|
author | Kleczynski, Pawel Kulbat, Aleksandra Brzychczy, Piotr Dziewierz, Artur Trebacz, Jaroslaw Stapor, Maciej Sorysz, Danuta Rzeszutko, Lukasz Bartus, Stanislaw Dudek, Dariusz Legutko, Jacek |
author_facet | Kleczynski, Pawel Kulbat, Aleksandra Brzychczy, Piotr Dziewierz, Artur Trebacz, Jaroslaw Stapor, Maciej Sorysz, Danuta Rzeszutko, Lukasz Bartus, Stanislaw Dudek, Dariusz Legutko, Jacek |
author_sort | Kleczynski, Pawel |
collection | PubMed |
description | The study aimed to assess procedural complications, patient flow and clinical outcomes after balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) as rescue or bridge therapy, based on data from our registry. A total of 382 BAVs in 374 patients was performed. The main primary indication for BAV was a bridge for TAVI (n = 185, 49.4%). Other indications included a bridge for AVR (n = 26, 6.9%) and rescue procedure in hemodynamically unstable patients (n = 139, 37.2%). The mortality rate at 30 days, 6 and 12 months was 10.4%, 21.6%, 28.3%, respectively. In rescue patients, the death rate raised to 66.9% at 12 months. A significant improvement in symptoms was confirmed after BAV, after 30 days, 6 months, and in survivors after 1 year (p < 0.05 for all). Independent predictors of 12-month mortality were baseline STS score [HR (95% CI) 1.42 (1.34 to 2.88), p < 0.0001], baseline LVEF <20% [HR (95% CI) 1.89 (1.55–2.83), p < 0.0001] and LVEF <30% at 1 month [HR (95% CI) 1.97 (1.62–3.67), p < 0.0001] adjusted for age/gender. In everyday clinical practice in the TAVI era, there are still clinical indications to BAV a standalone procedure as a bridge to surgery, TAVI or for urgent high risk non-cardiac surgical procedures. Patients may improve clinically after BAV with LV function recovery, allowing to perform final therapy, within limited time window, for severe AS which ameliorates long-term outcomes. On the other hand, in patients for whom an isolated BAV becomes a destination therapy, prognosis is extremely poor. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8538854 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85388542021-10-24 Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty for Severe Aortic Stenosis as Rescue or Bridge Therapy Kleczynski, Pawel Kulbat, Aleksandra Brzychczy, Piotr Dziewierz, Artur Trebacz, Jaroslaw Stapor, Maciej Sorysz, Danuta Rzeszutko, Lukasz Bartus, Stanislaw Dudek, Dariusz Legutko, Jacek J Clin Med Article The study aimed to assess procedural complications, patient flow and clinical outcomes after balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) as rescue or bridge therapy, based on data from our registry. A total of 382 BAVs in 374 patients was performed. The main primary indication for BAV was a bridge for TAVI (n = 185, 49.4%). Other indications included a bridge for AVR (n = 26, 6.9%) and rescue procedure in hemodynamically unstable patients (n = 139, 37.2%). The mortality rate at 30 days, 6 and 12 months was 10.4%, 21.6%, 28.3%, respectively. In rescue patients, the death rate raised to 66.9% at 12 months. A significant improvement in symptoms was confirmed after BAV, after 30 days, 6 months, and in survivors after 1 year (p < 0.05 for all). Independent predictors of 12-month mortality were baseline STS score [HR (95% CI) 1.42 (1.34 to 2.88), p < 0.0001], baseline LVEF <20% [HR (95% CI) 1.89 (1.55–2.83), p < 0.0001] and LVEF <30% at 1 month [HR (95% CI) 1.97 (1.62–3.67), p < 0.0001] adjusted for age/gender. In everyday clinical practice in the TAVI era, there are still clinical indications to BAV a standalone procedure as a bridge to surgery, TAVI or for urgent high risk non-cardiac surgical procedures. Patients may improve clinically after BAV with LV function recovery, allowing to perform final therapy, within limited time window, for severe AS which ameliorates long-term outcomes. On the other hand, in patients for whom an isolated BAV becomes a destination therapy, prognosis is extremely poor. MDPI 2021-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8538854/ /pubmed/34682783 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10204657 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Kleczynski, Pawel Kulbat, Aleksandra Brzychczy, Piotr Dziewierz, Artur Trebacz, Jaroslaw Stapor, Maciej Sorysz, Danuta Rzeszutko, Lukasz Bartus, Stanislaw Dudek, Dariusz Legutko, Jacek Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty for Severe Aortic Stenosis as Rescue or Bridge Therapy |
title | Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty for Severe Aortic Stenosis as Rescue or Bridge Therapy |
title_full | Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty for Severe Aortic Stenosis as Rescue or Bridge Therapy |
title_fullStr | Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty for Severe Aortic Stenosis as Rescue or Bridge Therapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty for Severe Aortic Stenosis as Rescue or Bridge Therapy |
title_short | Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty for Severe Aortic Stenosis as Rescue or Bridge Therapy |
title_sort | balloon aortic valvuloplasty for severe aortic stenosis as rescue or bridge therapy |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8538854/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34682783 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10204657 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kleczynskipawel balloonaorticvalvuloplastyforsevereaorticstenosisasrescueorbridgetherapy AT kulbataleksandra balloonaorticvalvuloplastyforsevereaorticstenosisasrescueorbridgetherapy AT brzychczypiotr balloonaorticvalvuloplastyforsevereaorticstenosisasrescueorbridgetherapy AT dziewierzartur balloonaorticvalvuloplastyforsevereaorticstenosisasrescueorbridgetherapy AT trebaczjaroslaw balloonaorticvalvuloplastyforsevereaorticstenosisasrescueorbridgetherapy AT stapormaciej balloonaorticvalvuloplastyforsevereaorticstenosisasrescueorbridgetherapy AT soryszdanuta balloonaorticvalvuloplastyforsevereaorticstenosisasrescueorbridgetherapy AT rzeszutkolukasz balloonaorticvalvuloplastyforsevereaorticstenosisasrescueorbridgetherapy AT bartusstanislaw balloonaorticvalvuloplastyforsevereaorticstenosisasrescueorbridgetherapy AT dudekdariusz balloonaorticvalvuloplastyforsevereaorticstenosisasrescueorbridgetherapy AT legutkojacek balloonaorticvalvuloplastyforsevereaorticstenosisasrescueorbridgetherapy |