Cargando…

History and Perspective of Immunotherapy for Pythiosis

The fungus-like microorganism Pythium insidiosum causes pythiosis, a life-threatening infectious disease increasingly reported worldwide. Antimicrobial drugs are ineffective. Radical surgery is an essential treatment. Pythiosis can resume post-surgically. Immunotherapy using P. insidiosum antigens (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yolanda, Hanna, Krajaejun, Theerapong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8539095/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34696188
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9101080
_version_ 1784588663853678592
author Yolanda, Hanna
Krajaejun, Theerapong
author_facet Yolanda, Hanna
Krajaejun, Theerapong
author_sort Yolanda, Hanna
collection PubMed
description The fungus-like microorganism Pythium insidiosum causes pythiosis, a life-threatening infectious disease increasingly reported worldwide. Antimicrobial drugs are ineffective. Radical surgery is an essential treatment. Pythiosis can resume post-surgically. Immunotherapy using P. insidiosum antigens (PIA) has emerged as an alternative treatment. This review aims at providing up-to-date information of the immunotherapeutic PIA, with the focus on its history, preparation, clinical application, outcome, mechanism, and recent advances, in order to promote the proper use and future development of this treatment modality. P. insidiosum crude extract is the primary source of immunotherapeutic antigens. Based on 967 documented human and animal (mainly horses) pythiosis cases, PIA immunotherapy reduced disease morbidity and mortality. Concerning clinical outcomes, 19.4% of PIA-immunized human patients succumbed to vascular pythiosis instead of 41.0% in unimmunized cases. PIA immunotherapy may not provide an advantage in a local P. insidiosum infection of the eye. Both PIA-immunized and unimmunized horses with pythiosis showed a similar survival rate of ~70%; however, demands for surgical intervention were much lesser in the immunized cases (22.8% vs. 75.2%). The proposed PIA action involves switching the non-protective T-helper-2 to protective T-helper-1 mediated immunity. By exploring the available P. insidiosum genome data, synthetic peptides, recombinant proteins, and nucleic acids are potential sources of the immunotherapeutic antigens worth investigating. The PIA therapeutic property needs improvement for a better prognosis of pythiosis patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8539095
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85390952021-10-24 History and Perspective of Immunotherapy for Pythiosis Yolanda, Hanna Krajaejun, Theerapong Vaccines (Basel) Review The fungus-like microorganism Pythium insidiosum causes pythiosis, a life-threatening infectious disease increasingly reported worldwide. Antimicrobial drugs are ineffective. Radical surgery is an essential treatment. Pythiosis can resume post-surgically. Immunotherapy using P. insidiosum antigens (PIA) has emerged as an alternative treatment. This review aims at providing up-to-date information of the immunotherapeutic PIA, with the focus on its history, preparation, clinical application, outcome, mechanism, and recent advances, in order to promote the proper use and future development of this treatment modality. P. insidiosum crude extract is the primary source of immunotherapeutic antigens. Based on 967 documented human and animal (mainly horses) pythiosis cases, PIA immunotherapy reduced disease morbidity and mortality. Concerning clinical outcomes, 19.4% of PIA-immunized human patients succumbed to vascular pythiosis instead of 41.0% in unimmunized cases. PIA immunotherapy may not provide an advantage in a local P. insidiosum infection of the eye. Both PIA-immunized and unimmunized horses with pythiosis showed a similar survival rate of ~70%; however, demands for surgical intervention were much lesser in the immunized cases (22.8% vs. 75.2%). The proposed PIA action involves switching the non-protective T-helper-2 to protective T-helper-1 mediated immunity. By exploring the available P. insidiosum genome data, synthetic peptides, recombinant proteins, and nucleic acids are potential sources of the immunotherapeutic antigens worth investigating. The PIA therapeutic property needs improvement for a better prognosis of pythiosis patients. MDPI 2021-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8539095/ /pubmed/34696188 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9101080 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Yolanda, Hanna
Krajaejun, Theerapong
History and Perspective of Immunotherapy for Pythiosis
title History and Perspective of Immunotherapy for Pythiosis
title_full History and Perspective of Immunotherapy for Pythiosis
title_fullStr History and Perspective of Immunotherapy for Pythiosis
title_full_unstemmed History and Perspective of Immunotherapy for Pythiosis
title_short History and Perspective of Immunotherapy for Pythiosis
title_sort history and perspective of immunotherapy for pythiosis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8539095/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34696188
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9101080
work_keys_str_mv AT yolandahanna historyandperspectiveofimmunotherapyforpythiosis
AT krajaejuntheerapong historyandperspectiveofimmunotherapyforpythiosis