Cargando…

Evaluation of Optimized Preprocessing and Modeling Algorithms for Prediction of Soil Properties Using VIS-NIR Spectroscopy

The absorbance spectra for air-dried and ground soil samples from Ontario, Canada were collected in the visible and near-infrared (VIS-NIR) region from 343 to 2200 nm. The study examined thirteen combination of six preprocessing (1st derivative, 2nd derivative, Savitzky-Golay, Gap, SNV and Detrend)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vestergaard, Rebecca-Jo, Vasava, Hiteshkumar Bhogilal, Aspinall, Doug, Chen, Songchao, Gillespie, Adam, Adamchuk, Viacheslav, Biswas, Asim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8539197/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34695958
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21206745
_version_ 1784588688476340224
author Vestergaard, Rebecca-Jo
Vasava, Hiteshkumar Bhogilal
Aspinall, Doug
Chen, Songchao
Gillespie, Adam
Adamchuk, Viacheslav
Biswas, Asim
author_facet Vestergaard, Rebecca-Jo
Vasava, Hiteshkumar Bhogilal
Aspinall, Doug
Chen, Songchao
Gillespie, Adam
Adamchuk, Viacheslav
Biswas, Asim
author_sort Vestergaard, Rebecca-Jo
collection PubMed
description The absorbance spectra for air-dried and ground soil samples from Ontario, Canada were collected in the visible and near-infrared (VIS-NIR) region from 343 to 2200 nm. The study examined thirteen combination of six preprocessing (1st derivative, 2nd derivative, Savitzky-Golay, Gap, SNV and Detrend) method included in ‘prospectr’ R package along with four modeling approaches: partial least square regression (PLSR), cubist, random forest (RF), and extreme learning machine (ELM) for prediction of the soil organic matter (SOM). The 1st derivative + gap, 2nd derivative + gap and standard normal variance (SNV) were the best preprocessing algorithms. Thus, only these three preprocessing algorithms along with four modeling approaches were used for prediction of soil pH, electrical conductively (EC), %sand, %silt, %clay, %very coarse sand (VCS), %coarse sand (CS), %medium sand (ms) and %fine sand (fs). The results showed that OM, pH, %sand, %silt and %CS were all predicted with confidence (R(2) > 0.60) and the combination of 1st derivative + gap and RF gained the best performance. A detailed comparison of the preprocessing and modeling algorithms for various soil properties in this study demonstrate that for better prediction of soil properties using VIS-NIR spectroscopy requires different preprocessing and modeling algorithms. However, in general RF and 1st derivative + gap can be labeled at the best combination of preprocessing and modelling algorithms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8539197
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85391972021-10-24 Evaluation of Optimized Preprocessing and Modeling Algorithms for Prediction of Soil Properties Using VIS-NIR Spectroscopy Vestergaard, Rebecca-Jo Vasava, Hiteshkumar Bhogilal Aspinall, Doug Chen, Songchao Gillespie, Adam Adamchuk, Viacheslav Biswas, Asim Sensors (Basel) Article The absorbance spectra for air-dried and ground soil samples from Ontario, Canada were collected in the visible and near-infrared (VIS-NIR) region from 343 to 2200 nm. The study examined thirteen combination of six preprocessing (1st derivative, 2nd derivative, Savitzky-Golay, Gap, SNV and Detrend) method included in ‘prospectr’ R package along with four modeling approaches: partial least square regression (PLSR), cubist, random forest (RF), and extreme learning machine (ELM) for prediction of the soil organic matter (SOM). The 1st derivative + gap, 2nd derivative + gap and standard normal variance (SNV) were the best preprocessing algorithms. Thus, only these three preprocessing algorithms along with four modeling approaches were used for prediction of soil pH, electrical conductively (EC), %sand, %silt, %clay, %very coarse sand (VCS), %coarse sand (CS), %medium sand (ms) and %fine sand (fs). The results showed that OM, pH, %sand, %silt and %CS were all predicted with confidence (R(2) > 0.60) and the combination of 1st derivative + gap and RF gained the best performance. A detailed comparison of the preprocessing and modeling algorithms for various soil properties in this study demonstrate that for better prediction of soil properties using VIS-NIR spectroscopy requires different preprocessing and modeling algorithms. However, in general RF and 1st derivative + gap can be labeled at the best combination of preprocessing and modelling algorithms. MDPI 2021-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8539197/ /pubmed/34695958 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21206745 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Vestergaard, Rebecca-Jo
Vasava, Hiteshkumar Bhogilal
Aspinall, Doug
Chen, Songchao
Gillespie, Adam
Adamchuk, Viacheslav
Biswas, Asim
Evaluation of Optimized Preprocessing and Modeling Algorithms for Prediction of Soil Properties Using VIS-NIR Spectroscopy
title Evaluation of Optimized Preprocessing and Modeling Algorithms for Prediction of Soil Properties Using VIS-NIR Spectroscopy
title_full Evaluation of Optimized Preprocessing and Modeling Algorithms for Prediction of Soil Properties Using VIS-NIR Spectroscopy
title_fullStr Evaluation of Optimized Preprocessing and Modeling Algorithms for Prediction of Soil Properties Using VIS-NIR Spectroscopy
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Optimized Preprocessing and Modeling Algorithms for Prediction of Soil Properties Using VIS-NIR Spectroscopy
title_short Evaluation of Optimized Preprocessing and Modeling Algorithms for Prediction of Soil Properties Using VIS-NIR Spectroscopy
title_sort evaluation of optimized preprocessing and modeling algorithms for prediction of soil properties using vis-nir spectroscopy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8539197/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34695958
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21206745
work_keys_str_mv AT vestergaardrebeccajo evaluationofoptimizedpreprocessingandmodelingalgorithmsforpredictionofsoilpropertiesusingvisnirspectroscopy
AT vasavahiteshkumarbhogilal evaluationofoptimizedpreprocessingandmodelingalgorithmsforpredictionofsoilpropertiesusingvisnirspectroscopy
AT aspinalldoug evaluationofoptimizedpreprocessingandmodelingalgorithmsforpredictionofsoilpropertiesusingvisnirspectroscopy
AT chensongchao evaluationofoptimizedpreprocessingandmodelingalgorithmsforpredictionofsoilpropertiesusingvisnirspectroscopy
AT gillespieadam evaluationofoptimizedpreprocessingandmodelingalgorithmsforpredictionofsoilpropertiesusingvisnirspectroscopy
AT adamchukviacheslav evaluationofoptimizedpreprocessingandmodelingalgorithmsforpredictionofsoilpropertiesusingvisnirspectroscopy
AT biswasasim evaluationofoptimizedpreprocessingandmodelingalgorithmsforpredictionofsoilpropertiesusingvisnirspectroscopy