Cargando…
Evaluation of Optimized Preprocessing and Modeling Algorithms for Prediction of Soil Properties Using VIS-NIR Spectroscopy
The absorbance spectra for air-dried and ground soil samples from Ontario, Canada were collected in the visible and near-infrared (VIS-NIR) region from 343 to 2200 nm. The study examined thirteen combination of six preprocessing (1st derivative, 2nd derivative, Savitzky-Golay, Gap, SNV and Detrend)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8539197/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34695958 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21206745 |
_version_ | 1784588688476340224 |
---|---|
author | Vestergaard, Rebecca-Jo Vasava, Hiteshkumar Bhogilal Aspinall, Doug Chen, Songchao Gillespie, Adam Adamchuk, Viacheslav Biswas, Asim |
author_facet | Vestergaard, Rebecca-Jo Vasava, Hiteshkumar Bhogilal Aspinall, Doug Chen, Songchao Gillespie, Adam Adamchuk, Viacheslav Biswas, Asim |
author_sort | Vestergaard, Rebecca-Jo |
collection | PubMed |
description | The absorbance spectra for air-dried and ground soil samples from Ontario, Canada were collected in the visible and near-infrared (VIS-NIR) region from 343 to 2200 nm. The study examined thirteen combination of six preprocessing (1st derivative, 2nd derivative, Savitzky-Golay, Gap, SNV and Detrend) method included in ‘prospectr’ R package along with four modeling approaches: partial least square regression (PLSR), cubist, random forest (RF), and extreme learning machine (ELM) for prediction of the soil organic matter (SOM). The 1st derivative + gap, 2nd derivative + gap and standard normal variance (SNV) were the best preprocessing algorithms. Thus, only these three preprocessing algorithms along with four modeling approaches were used for prediction of soil pH, electrical conductively (EC), %sand, %silt, %clay, %very coarse sand (VCS), %coarse sand (CS), %medium sand (ms) and %fine sand (fs). The results showed that OM, pH, %sand, %silt and %CS were all predicted with confidence (R(2) > 0.60) and the combination of 1st derivative + gap and RF gained the best performance. A detailed comparison of the preprocessing and modeling algorithms for various soil properties in this study demonstrate that for better prediction of soil properties using VIS-NIR spectroscopy requires different preprocessing and modeling algorithms. However, in general RF and 1st derivative + gap can be labeled at the best combination of preprocessing and modelling algorithms. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8539197 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85391972021-10-24 Evaluation of Optimized Preprocessing and Modeling Algorithms for Prediction of Soil Properties Using VIS-NIR Spectroscopy Vestergaard, Rebecca-Jo Vasava, Hiteshkumar Bhogilal Aspinall, Doug Chen, Songchao Gillespie, Adam Adamchuk, Viacheslav Biswas, Asim Sensors (Basel) Article The absorbance spectra for air-dried and ground soil samples from Ontario, Canada were collected in the visible and near-infrared (VIS-NIR) region from 343 to 2200 nm. The study examined thirteen combination of six preprocessing (1st derivative, 2nd derivative, Savitzky-Golay, Gap, SNV and Detrend) method included in ‘prospectr’ R package along with four modeling approaches: partial least square regression (PLSR), cubist, random forest (RF), and extreme learning machine (ELM) for prediction of the soil organic matter (SOM). The 1st derivative + gap, 2nd derivative + gap and standard normal variance (SNV) were the best preprocessing algorithms. Thus, only these three preprocessing algorithms along with four modeling approaches were used for prediction of soil pH, electrical conductively (EC), %sand, %silt, %clay, %very coarse sand (VCS), %coarse sand (CS), %medium sand (ms) and %fine sand (fs). The results showed that OM, pH, %sand, %silt and %CS were all predicted with confidence (R(2) > 0.60) and the combination of 1st derivative + gap and RF gained the best performance. A detailed comparison of the preprocessing and modeling algorithms for various soil properties in this study demonstrate that for better prediction of soil properties using VIS-NIR spectroscopy requires different preprocessing and modeling algorithms. However, in general RF and 1st derivative + gap can be labeled at the best combination of preprocessing and modelling algorithms. MDPI 2021-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8539197/ /pubmed/34695958 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21206745 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Vestergaard, Rebecca-Jo Vasava, Hiteshkumar Bhogilal Aspinall, Doug Chen, Songchao Gillespie, Adam Adamchuk, Viacheslav Biswas, Asim Evaluation of Optimized Preprocessing and Modeling Algorithms for Prediction of Soil Properties Using VIS-NIR Spectroscopy |
title | Evaluation of Optimized Preprocessing and Modeling Algorithms for Prediction of Soil Properties Using VIS-NIR Spectroscopy |
title_full | Evaluation of Optimized Preprocessing and Modeling Algorithms for Prediction of Soil Properties Using VIS-NIR Spectroscopy |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Optimized Preprocessing and Modeling Algorithms for Prediction of Soil Properties Using VIS-NIR Spectroscopy |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Optimized Preprocessing and Modeling Algorithms for Prediction of Soil Properties Using VIS-NIR Spectroscopy |
title_short | Evaluation of Optimized Preprocessing and Modeling Algorithms for Prediction of Soil Properties Using VIS-NIR Spectroscopy |
title_sort | evaluation of optimized preprocessing and modeling algorithms for prediction of soil properties using vis-nir spectroscopy |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8539197/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34695958 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21206745 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vestergaardrebeccajo evaluationofoptimizedpreprocessingandmodelingalgorithmsforpredictionofsoilpropertiesusingvisnirspectroscopy AT vasavahiteshkumarbhogilal evaluationofoptimizedpreprocessingandmodelingalgorithmsforpredictionofsoilpropertiesusingvisnirspectroscopy AT aspinalldoug evaluationofoptimizedpreprocessingandmodelingalgorithmsforpredictionofsoilpropertiesusingvisnirspectroscopy AT chensongchao evaluationofoptimizedpreprocessingandmodelingalgorithmsforpredictionofsoilpropertiesusingvisnirspectroscopy AT gillespieadam evaluationofoptimizedpreprocessingandmodelingalgorithmsforpredictionofsoilpropertiesusingvisnirspectroscopy AT adamchukviacheslav evaluationofoptimizedpreprocessingandmodelingalgorithmsforpredictionofsoilpropertiesusingvisnirspectroscopy AT biswasasim evaluationofoptimizedpreprocessingandmodelingalgorithmsforpredictionofsoilpropertiesusingvisnirspectroscopy |