Cargando…

Relationship between Nutritional Status and Clinical Outcome in Patients Treated for Lung Cancer

Background. Between 34.5% and 69% of the patients with lung cancer are at risk of malnutrition. Quality of life (QoL) and physical status assessment provides valuable prognostic data on lung cancer patients. Malnutrition is a prognostic parameter for clinical outcome. Therefore, the identification o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Polański, Jacek, Chabowski, Mariusz, Świątoniowska-Lonc, Natalia, Dudek, Krzysztof, Jankowska-Polańska, Beata, Zabierowski, Jan, Mazur, Grzegorz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8539241/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34684333
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu13103332
_version_ 1784588699086880768
author Polański, Jacek
Chabowski, Mariusz
Świątoniowska-Lonc, Natalia
Dudek, Krzysztof
Jankowska-Polańska, Beata
Zabierowski, Jan
Mazur, Grzegorz
author_facet Polański, Jacek
Chabowski, Mariusz
Świątoniowska-Lonc, Natalia
Dudek, Krzysztof
Jankowska-Polańska, Beata
Zabierowski, Jan
Mazur, Grzegorz
author_sort Polański, Jacek
collection PubMed
description Background. Between 34.5% and 69% of the patients with lung cancer are at risk of malnutrition. Quality of life (QoL) and physical status assessment provides valuable prognostic data on lung cancer patients. Malnutrition is a prognostic parameter for clinical outcome. Therefore, the identification of significant factors affecting the clinical outcome and QoL is important. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between nutritional status and outcome, i.e., overall survival, time to tumor progression, and QoL, in lung cancer patients. Materials and methods. We performed a systematic search of the Pubmed/MEDLINE databases per the Cochrane guidelines to conduct a meta-analysis consistent with the PRISMA statement, using the following keywords: “lung cancer,” “malnutrition,” “nutrition,” “quality of life,” “well-being,” “health-related quality of life,” and “outcome.” Out of the 96 papers identified, 12 were included in our meta-analysis. Results. Our meta-analysis shows that patients with a good nutritional status have a better QoL than malnourished patients in the following functioning domains: physical (g = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.19 to 1.46, p < 0.001), role (g = 1.45, 95% CI = 1.31 to 1.59, p < 0.001), emotional (g = 1.10, 95% CI = 0.97 to 1.24, p < 0.001), cognitive (g = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.76 to 1.06, p < 0.001), and social (g = 1.41, 95% CI = 1.27 to 1.56, p < 0.001). The risk of death was significantly higher in malnourished than in well-nourished patients (HR = 1.53, 95% CI = 1.25 to 1.86, p < 0.001). Nutritional status was significantly associated with survival, indicating that patients with a poorer nutritional status are at more risk of relapse. Conclusions. Nutritional status is a significant clinical and prognostic parameter in the assessment of lung cancer treatment. Malnutrition is associated with poorer outcome in terms of overall survival, time to tumor progression, and QoL in patients treated for lung cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8539241
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85392412021-10-24 Relationship between Nutritional Status and Clinical Outcome in Patients Treated for Lung Cancer Polański, Jacek Chabowski, Mariusz Świątoniowska-Lonc, Natalia Dudek, Krzysztof Jankowska-Polańska, Beata Zabierowski, Jan Mazur, Grzegorz Nutrients Article Background. Between 34.5% and 69% of the patients with lung cancer are at risk of malnutrition. Quality of life (QoL) and physical status assessment provides valuable prognostic data on lung cancer patients. Malnutrition is a prognostic parameter for clinical outcome. Therefore, the identification of significant factors affecting the clinical outcome and QoL is important. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between nutritional status and outcome, i.e., overall survival, time to tumor progression, and QoL, in lung cancer patients. Materials and methods. We performed a systematic search of the Pubmed/MEDLINE databases per the Cochrane guidelines to conduct a meta-analysis consistent with the PRISMA statement, using the following keywords: “lung cancer,” “malnutrition,” “nutrition,” “quality of life,” “well-being,” “health-related quality of life,” and “outcome.” Out of the 96 papers identified, 12 were included in our meta-analysis. Results. Our meta-analysis shows that patients with a good nutritional status have a better QoL than malnourished patients in the following functioning domains: physical (g = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.19 to 1.46, p < 0.001), role (g = 1.45, 95% CI = 1.31 to 1.59, p < 0.001), emotional (g = 1.10, 95% CI = 0.97 to 1.24, p < 0.001), cognitive (g = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.76 to 1.06, p < 0.001), and social (g = 1.41, 95% CI = 1.27 to 1.56, p < 0.001). The risk of death was significantly higher in malnourished than in well-nourished patients (HR = 1.53, 95% CI = 1.25 to 1.86, p < 0.001). Nutritional status was significantly associated with survival, indicating that patients with a poorer nutritional status are at more risk of relapse. Conclusions. Nutritional status is a significant clinical and prognostic parameter in the assessment of lung cancer treatment. Malnutrition is associated with poorer outcome in terms of overall survival, time to tumor progression, and QoL in patients treated for lung cancer. MDPI 2021-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8539241/ /pubmed/34684333 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu13103332 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Polański, Jacek
Chabowski, Mariusz
Świątoniowska-Lonc, Natalia
Dudek, Krzysztof
Jankowska-Polańska, Beata
Zabierowski, Jan
Mazur, Grzegorz
Relationship between Nutritional Status and Clinical Outcome in Patients Treated for Lung Cancer
title Relationship between Nutritional Status and Clinical Outcome in Patients Treated for Lung Cancer
title_full Relationship between Nutritional Status and Clinical Outcome in Patients Treated for Lung Cancer
title_fullStr Relationship between Nutritional Status and Clinical Outcome in Patients Treated for Lung Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Relationship between Nutritional Status and Clinical Outcome in Patients Treated for Lung Cancer
title_short Relationship between Nutritional Status and Clinical Outcome in Patients Treated for Lung Cancer
title_sort relationship between nutritional status and clinical outcome in patients treated for lung cancer
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8539241/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34684333
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu13103332
work_keys_str_mv AT polanskijacek relationshipbetweennutritionalstatusandclinicaloutcomeinpatientstreatedforlungcancer
AT chabowskimariusz relationshipbetweennutritionalstatusandclinicaloutcomeinpatientstreatedforlungcancer
AT swiatoniowskaloncnatalia relationshipbetweennutritionalstatusandclinicaloutcomeinpatientstreatedforlungcancer
AT dudekkrzysztof relationshipbetweennutritionalstatusandclinicaloutcomeinpatientstreatedforlungcancer
AT jankowskapolanskabeata relationshipbetweennutritionalstatusandclinicaloutcomeinpatientstreatedforlungcancer
AT zabierowskijan relationshipbetweennutritionalstatusandclinicaloutcomeinpatientstreatedforlungcancer
AT mazurgrzegorz relationshipbetweennutritionalstatusandclinicaloutcomeinpatientstreatedforlungcancer