Cargando…
Influence of Implantation Depth on the Performance of Intracortical Probe Recording Sites
Microelectrode arrays (MEAs) enable the recording of electrical activity from cortical neurons which has implications for basic neuroscience and neuroprosthetic applications. The design space for MEA technology is extremely wide where devices may vary with respect to the number of monolithic shanks...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8539313/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34683209 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi12101158 |
_version_ | 1784588716873875456 |
---|---|
author | Usoro, Joshua O. Dogra, Komal Abbott, Justin R. Radhakrishna, Rahul Cogan, Stuart F. Pancrazio, Joseph J. Patnaik, Sourav S. |
author_facet | Usoro, Joshua O. Dogra, Komal Abbott, Justin R. Radhakrishna, Rahul Cogan, Stuart F. Pancrazio, Joseph J. Patnaik, Sourav S. |
author_sort | Usoro, Joshua O. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Microelectrode arrays (MEAs) enable the recording of electrical activity from cortical neurons which has implications for basic neuroscience and neuroprosthetic applications. The design space for MEA technology is extremely wide where devices may vary with respect to the number of monolithic shanks as well as placement of microelectrode sites. In the present study, we examine the differences in recording ability between two different MEA configurations: single shank (SS) and multi-shank (MS), both of which consist of 16 recording sites implanted in the rat motor cortex. We observed a significant difference in the proportion of active microelectrode sites over the 8-week indwelling period, in which SS devices exhibited a consistent ability to record activity, in contrast to the MS arrays which showed a marked decrease in activity within 2 weeks post-implantation. Furthermore, this difference was revealed to be dependent on the depth at which the microelectrode sites were located and may be mediated by anatomical heterogeneity, as well as the distribution of inhibitory neurons within the cortical layers. Our results indicate that the implantation depth of microelectrodes within the cortex needs to be considered relative to the chronic performance characterization. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8539313 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85393132021-10-24 Influence of Implantation Depth on the Performance of Intracortical Probe Recording Sites Usoro, Joshua O. Dogra, Komal Abbott, Justin R. Radhakrishna, Rahul Cogan, Stuart F. Pancrazio, Joseph J. Patnaik, Sourav S. Micromachines (Basel) Communication Microelectrode arrays (MEAs) enable the recording of electrical activity from cortical neurons which has implications for basic neuroscience and neuroprosthetic applications. The design space for MEA technology is extremely wide where devices may vary with respect to the number of monolithic shanks as well as placement of microelectrode sites. In the present study, we examine the differences in recording ability between two different MEA configurations: single shank (SS) and multi-shank (MS), both of which consist of 16 recording sites implanted in the rat motor cortex. We observed a significant difference in the proportion of active microelectrode sites over the 8-week indwelling period, in which SS devices exhibited a consistent ability to record activity, in contrast to the MS arrays which showed a marked decrease in activity within 2 weeks post-implantation. Furthermore, this difference was revealed to be dependent on the depth at which the microelectrode sites were located and may be mediated by anatomical heterogeneity, as well as the distribution of inhibitory neurons within the cortical layers. Our results indicate that the implantation depth of microelectrodes within the cortex needs to be considered relative to the chronic performance characterization. MDPI 2021-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8539313/ /pubmed/34683209 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi12101158 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Communication Usoro, Joshua O. Dogra, Komal Abbott, Justin R. Radhakrishna, Rahul Cogan, Stuart F. Pancrazio, Joseph J. Patnaik, Sourav S. Influence of Implantation Depth on the Performance of Intracortical Probe Recording Sites |
title | Influence of Implantation Depth on the Performance of Intracortical Probe Recording Sites |
title_full | Influence of Implantation Depth on the Performance of Intracortical Probe Recording Sites |
title_fullStr | Influence of Implantation Depth on the Performance of Intracortical Probe Recording Sites |
title_full_unstemmed | Influence of Implantation Depth on the Performance of Intracortical Probe Recording Sites |
title_short | Influence of Implantation Depth on the Performance of Intracortical Probe Recording Sites |
title_sort | influence of implantation depth on the performance of intracortical probe recording sites |
topic | Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8539313/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34683209 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi12101158 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT usorojoshuao influenceofimplantationdepthontheperformanceofintracorticalproberecordingsites AT dograkomal influenceofimplantationdepthontheperformanceofintracorticalproberecordingsites AT abbottjustinr influenceofimplantationdepthontheperformanceofintracorticalproberecordingsites AT radhakrishnarahul influenceofimplantationdepthontheperformanceofintracorticalproberecordingsites AT coganstuartf influenceofimplantationdepthontheperformanceofintracorticalproberecordingsites AT pancraziojosephj influenceofimplantationdepthontheperformanceofintracorticalproberecordingsites AT patnaiksouravs influenceofimplantationdepthontheperformanceofintracorticalproberecordingsites |