Cargando…

Influence of Implantation Depth on the Performance of Intracortical Probe Recording Sites

Microelectrode arrays (MEAs) enable the recording of electrical activity from cortical neurons which has implications for basic neuroscience and neuroprosthetic applications. The design space for MEA technology is extremely wide where devices may vary with respect to the number of monolithic shanks...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Usoro, Joshua O., Dogra, Komal, Abbott, Justin R., Radhakrishna, Rahul, Cogan, Stuart F., Pancrazio, Joseph J., Patnaik, Sourav S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8539313/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34683209
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi12101158
_version_ 1784588716873875456
author Usoro, Joshua O.
Dogra, Komal
Abbott, Justin R.
Radhakrishna, Rahul
Cogan, Stuart F.
Pancrazio, Joseph J.
Patnaik, Sourav S.
author_facet Usoro, Joshua O.
Dogra, Komal
Abbott, Justin R.
Radhakrishna, Rahul
Cogan, Stuart F.
Pancrazio, Joseph J.
Patnaik, Sourav S.
author_sort Usoro, Joshua O.
collection PubMed
description Microelectrode arrays (MEAs) enable the recording of electrical activity from cortical neurons which has implications for basic neuroscience and neuroprosthetic applications. The design space for MEA technology is extremely wide where devices may vary with respect to the number of monolithic shanks as well as placement of microelectrode sites. In the present study, we examine the differences in recording ability between two different MEA configurations: single shank (SS) and multi-shank (MS), both of which consist of 16 recording sites implanted in the rat motor cortex. We observed a significant difference in the proportion of active microelectrode sites over the 8-week indwelling period, in which SS devices exhibited a consistent ability to record activity, in contrast to the MS arrays which showed a marked decrease in activity within 2 weeks post-implantation. Furthermore, this difference was revealed to be dependent on the depth at which the microelectrode sites were located and may be mediated by anatomical heterogeneity, as well as the distribution of inhibitory neurons within the cortical layers. Our results indicate that the implantation depth of microelectrodes within the cortex needs to be considered relative to the chronic performance characterization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8539313
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85393132021-10-24 Influence of Implantation Depth on the Performance of Intracortical Probe Recording Sites Usoro, Joshua O. Dogra, Komal Abbott, Justin R. Radhakrishna, Rahul Cogan, Stuart F. Pancrazio, Joseph J. Patnaik, Sourav S. Micromachines (Basel) Communication Microelectrode arrays (MEAs) enable the recording of electrical activity from cortical neurons which has implications for basic neuroscience and neuroprosthetic applications. The design space for MEA technology is extremely wide where devices may vary with respect to the number of monolithic shanks as well as placement of microelectrode sites. In the present study, we examine the differences in recording ability between two different MEA configurations: single shank (SS) and multi-shank (MS), both of which consist of 16 recording sites implanted in the rat motor cortex. We observed a significant difference in the proportion of active microelectrode sites over the 8-week indwelling period, in which SS devices exhibited a consistent ability to record activity, in contrast to the MS arrays which showed a marked decrease in activity within 2 weeks post-implantation. Furthermore, this difference was revealed to be dependent on the depth at which the microelectrode sites were located and may be mediated by anatomical heterogeneity, as well as the distribution of inhibitory neurons within the cortical layers. Our results indicate that the implantation depth of microelectrodes within the cortex needs to be considered relative to the chronic performance characterization. MDPI 2021-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8539313/ /pubmed/34683209 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi12101158 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Communication
Usoro, Joshua O.
Dogra, Komal
Abbott, Justin R.
Radhakrishna, Rahul
Cogan, Stuart F.
Pancrazio, Joseph J.
Patnaik, Sourav S.
Influence of Implantation Depth on the Performance of Intracortical Probe Recording Sites
title Influence of Implantation Depth on the Performance of Intracortical Probe Recording Sites
title_full Influence of Implantation Depth on the Performance of Intracortical Probe Recording Sites
title_fullStr Influence of Implantation Depth on the Performance of Intracortical Probe Recording Sites
title_full_unstemmed Influence of Implantation Depth on the Performance of Intracortical Probe Recording Sites
title_short Influence of Implantation Depth on the Performance of Intracortical Probe Recording Sites
title_sort influence of implantation depth on the performance of intracortical probe recording sites
topic Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8539313/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34683209
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi12101158
work_keys_str_mv AT usorojoshuao influenceofimplantationdepthontheperformanceofintracorticalproberecordingsites
AT dograkomal influenceofimplantationdepthontheperformanceofintracorticalproberecordingsites
AT abbottjustinr influenceofimplantationdepthontheperformanceofintracorticalproberecordingsites
AT radhakrishnarahul influenceofimplantationdepthontheperformanceofintracorticalproberecordingsites
AT coganstuartf influenceofimplantationdepthontheperformanceofintracorticalproberecordingsites
AT pancraziojosephj influenceofimplantationdepthontheperformanceofintracorticalproberecordingsites
AT patnaiksouravs influenceofimplantationdepthontheperformanceofintracorticalproberecordingsites