Cargando…
A Critical Overview of FDA and EMA Statistical Methods to Compare In Vitro Drug Dissolution Profiles of Pharmaceutical Products
A drug dissolution profile is one of the most critical dosage form characteristics with immediate and controlled drug release. Comparing the dissolution profiles of different pharmaceutical products plays a key role before starting the bioequivalence or stability studies. General recommendations for...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8539859/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34683995 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13101703 |
_version_ | 1784588847746646016 |
---|---|
author | Muselík, Jan Komersová, Alena Kubová, Kateřina Matzick, Kevin Skalická, Barbora |
author_facet | Muselík, Jan Komersová, Alena Kubová, Kateřina Matzick, Kevin Skalická, Barbora |
author_sort | Muselík, Jan |
collection | PubMed |
description | A drug dissolution profile is one of the most critical dosage form characteristics with immediate and controlled drug release. Comparing the dissolution profiles of different pharmaceutical products plays a key role before starting the bioequivalence or stability studies. General recommendations for dissolution profile comparison are mentioned by the EMA and FDA guidelines. However, neither the EMA nor the FDA provides unambiguous instructions for comparing the dissolution curves, except for calculating the similarity factor f(2). In agreement with the EMA and FDA strategy for comparing the dissolution profiles, this manuscript provides an overview of suitable statistical methods (CI derivation for f(2) based on bootstrap, CI derivation for the difference between reference and test samples, Mahalanobis distance, model-dependent approach and maximum deviation method), their procedures and limitations. However, usage of statistical approaches for the above-described methods can be met with difficulties, especially when combined with the requirement of practice for robust and straightforward techniques for data evaluation. Therefore, the bootstrap to derive the CI for f(2) or CI derivation for the difference between reference and test samples was selected as the method of choice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8539859 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85398592021-10-24 A Critical Overview of FDA and EMA Statistical Methods to Compare In Vitro Drug Dissolution Profiles of Pharmaceutical Products Muselík, Jan Komersová, Alena Kubová, Kateřina Matzick, Kevin Skalická, Barbora Pharmaceutics Article A drug dissolution profile is one of the most critical dosage form characteristics with immediate and controlled drug release. Comparing the dissolution profiles of different pharmaceutical products plays a key role before starting the bioequivalence or stability studies. General recommendations for dissolution profile comparison are mentioned by the EMA and FDA guidelines. However, neither the EMA nor the FDA provides unambiguous instructions for comparing the dissolution curves, except for calculating the similarity factor f(2). In agreement with the EMA and FDA strategy for comparing the dissolution profiles, this manuscript provides an overview of suitable statistical methods (CI derivation for f(2) based on bootstrap, CI derivation for the difference between reference and test samples, Mahalanobis distance, model-dependent approach and maximum deviation method), their procedures and limitations. However, usage of statistical approaches for the above-described methods can be met with difficulties, especially when combined with the requirement of practice for robust and straightforward techniques for data evaluation. Therefore, the bootstrap to derive the CI for f(2) or CI derivation for the difference between reference and test samples was selected as the method of choice. MDPI 2021-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8539859/ /pubmed/34683995 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13101703 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Muselík, Jan Komersová, Alena Kubová, Kateřina Matzick, Kevin Skalická, Barbora A Critical Overview of FDA and EMA Statistical Methods to Compare In Vitro Drug Dissolution Profiles of Pharmaceutical Products |
title | A Critical Overview of FDA and EMA Statistical Methods to Compare In Vitro Drug Dissolution Profiles of Pharmaceutical Products |
title_full | A Critical Overview of FDA and EMA Statistical Methods to Compare In Vitro Drug Dissolution Profiles of Pharmaceutical Products |
title_fullStr | A Critical Overview of FDA and EMA Statistical Methods to Compare In Vitro Drug Dissolution Profiles of Pharmaceutical Products |
title_full_unstemmed | A Critical Overview of FDA and EMA Statistical Methods to Compare In Vitro Drug Dissolution Profiles of Pharmaceutical Products |
title_short | A Critical Overview of FDA and EMA Statistical Methods to Compare In Vitro Drug Dissolution Profiles of Pharmaceutical Products |
title_sort | critical overview of fda and ema statistical methods to compare in vitro drug dissolution profiles of pharmaceutical products |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8539859/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34683995 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13101703 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT muselikjan acriticaloverviewoffdaandemastatisticalmethodstocompareinvitrodrugdissolutionprofilesofpharmaceuticalproducts AT komersovaalena acriticaloverviewoffdaandemastatisticalmethodstocompareinvitrodrugdissolutionprofilesofpharmaceuticalproducts AT kubovakaterina acriticaloverviewoffdaandemastatisticalmethodstocompareinvitrodrugdissolutionprofilesofpharmaceuticalproducts AT matzickkevin acriticaloverviewoffdaandemastatisticalmethodstocompareinvitrodrugdissolutionprofilesofpharmaceuticalproducts AT skalickabarbora acriticaloverviewoffdaandemastatisticalmethodstocompareinvitrodrugdissolutionprofilesofpharmaceuticalproducts AT muselikjan criticaloverviewoffdaandemastatisticalmethodstocompareinvitrodrugdissolutionprofilesofpharmaceuticalproducts AT komersovaalena criticaloverviewoffdaandemastatisticalmethodstocompareinvitrodrugdissolutionprofilesofpharmaceuticalproducts AT kubovakaterina criticaloverviewoffdaandemastatisticalmethodstocompareinvitrodrugdissolutionprofilesofpharmaceuticalproducts AT matzickkevin criticaloverviewoffdaandemastatisticalmethodstocompareinvitrodrugdissolutionprofilesofpharmaceuticalproducts AT skalickabarbora criticaloverviewoffdaandemastatisticalmethodstocompareinvitrodrugdissolutionprofilesofpharmaceuticalproducts |