Cargando…

A Critical Overview of FDA and EMA Statistical Methods to Compare In Vitro Drug Dissolution Profiles of Pharmaceutical Products

A drug dissolution profile is one of the most critical dosage form characteristics with immediate and controlled drug release. Comparing the dissolution profiles of different pharmaceutical products plays a key role before starting the bioequivalence or stability studies. General recommendations for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Muselík, Jan, Komersová, Alena, Kubová, Kateřina, Matzick, Kevin, Skalická, Barbora
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8539859/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34683995
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13101703
_version_ 1784588847746646016
author Muselík, Jan
Komersová, Alena
Kubová, Kateřina
Matzick, Kevin
Skalická, Barbora
author_facet Muselík, Jan
Komersová, Alena
Kubová, Kateřina
Matzick, Kevin
Skalická, Barbora
author_sort Muselík, Jan
collection PubMed
description A drug dissolution profile is one of the most critical dosage form characteristics with immediate and controlled drug release. Comparing the dissolution profiles of different pharmaceutical products plays a key role before starting the bioequivalence or stability studies. General recommendations for dissolution profile comparison are mentioned by the EMA and FDA guidelines. However, neither the EMA nor the FDA provides unambiguous instructions for comparing the dissolution curves, except for calculating the similarity factor f(2). In agreement with the EMA and FDA strategy for comparing the dissolution profiles, this manuscript provides an overview of suitable statistical methods (CI derivation for f(2) based on bootstrap, CI derivation for the difference between reference and test samples, Mahalanobis distance, model-dependent approach and maximum deviation method), their procedures and limitations. However, usage of statistical approaches for the above-described methods can be met with difficulties, especially when combined with the requirement of practice for robust and straightforward techniques for data evaluation. Therefore, the bootstrap to derive the CI for f(2) or CI derivation for the difference between reference and test samples was selected as the method of choice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8539859
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85398592021-10-24 A Critical Overview of FDA and EMA Statistical Methods to Compare In Vitro Drug Dissolution Profiles of Pharmaceutical Products Muselík, Jan Komersová, Alena Kubová, Kateřina Matzick, Kevin Skalická, Barbora Pharmaceutics Article A drug dissolution profile is one of the most critical dosage form characteristics with immediate and controlled drug release. Comparing the dissolution profiles of different pharmaceutical products plays a key role before starting the bioequivalence or stability studies. General recommendations for dissolution profile comparison are mentioned by the EMA and FDA guidelines. However, neither the EMA nor the FDA provides unambiguous instructions for comparing the dissolution curves, except for calculating the similarity factor f(2). In agreement with the EMA and FDA strategy for comparing the dissolution profiles, this manuscript provides an overview of suitable statistical methods (CI derivation for f(2) based on bootstrap, CI derivation for the difference between reference and test samples, Mahalanobis distance, model-dependent approach and maximum deviation method), their procedures and limitations. However, usage of statistical approaches for the above-described methods can be met with difficulties, especially when combined with the requirement of practice for robust and straightforward techniques for data evaluation. Therefore, the bootstrap to derive the CI for f(2) or CI derivation for the difference between reference and test samples was selected as the method of choice. MDPI 2021-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8539859/ /pubmed/34683995 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13101703 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Muselík, Jan
Komersová, Alena
Kubová, Kateřina
Matzick, Kevin
Skalická, Barbora
A Critical Overview of FDA and EMA Statistical Methods to Compare In Vitro Drug Dissolution Profiles of Pharmaceutical Products
title A Critical Overview of FDA and EMA Statistical Methods to Compare In Vitro Drug Dissolution Profiles of Pharmaceutical Products
title_full A Critical Overview of FDA and EMA Statistical Methods to Compare In Vitro Drug Dissolution Profiles of Pharmaceutical Products
title_fullStr A Critical Overview of FDA and EMA Statistical Methods to Compare In Vitro Drug Dissolution Profiles of Pharmaceutical Products
title_full_unstemmed A Critical Overview of FDA and EMA Statistical Methods to Compare In Vitro Drug Dissolution Profiles of Pharmaceutical Products
title_short A Critical Overview of FDA and EMA Statistical Methods to Compare In Vitro Drug Dissolution Profiles of Pharmaceutical Products
title_sort critical overview of fda and ema statistical methods to compare in vitro drug dissolution profiles of pharmaceutical products
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8539859/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34683995
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13101703
work_keys_str_mv AT muselikjan acriticaloverviewoffdaandemastatisticalmethodstocompareinvitrodrugdissolutionprofilesofpharmaceuticalproducts
AT komersovaalena acriticaloverviewoffdaandemastatisticalmethodstocompareinvitrodrugdissolutionprofilesofpharmaceuticalproducts
AT kubovakaterina acriticaloverviewoffdaandemastatisticalmethodstocompareinvitrodrugdissolutionprofilesofpharmaceuticalproducts
AT matzickkevin acriticaloverviewoffdaandemastatisticalmethodstocompareinvitrodrugdissolutionprofilesofpharmaceuticalproducts
AT skalickabarbora acriticaloverviewoffdaandemastatisticalmethodstocompareinvitrodrugdissolutionprofilesofpharmaceuticalproducts
AT muselikjan criticaloverviewoffdaandemastatisticalmethodstocompareinvitrodrugdissolutionprofilesofpharmaceuticalproducts
AT komersovaalena criticaloverviewoffdaandemastatisticalmethodstocompareinvitrodrugdissolutionprofilesofpharmaceuticalproducts
AT kubovakaterina criticaloverviewoffdaandemastatisticalmethodstocompareinvitrodrugdissolutionprofilesofpharmaceuticalproducts
AT matzickkevin criticaloverviewoffdaandemastatisticalmethodstocompareinvitrodrugdissolutionprofilesofpharmaceuticalproducts
AT skalickabarbora criticaloverviewoffdaandemastatisticalmethodstocompareinvitrodrugdissolutionprofilesofpharmaceuticalproducts