Cargando…

Biosignal-Based Human–Machine Interfaces for Assistance and Rehabilitation: A Survey

As a definition, Human–Machine Interface (HMI) enables a person to interact with a device. Starting from elementary equipment, the recent development of novel techniques and unobtrusive devices for biosignals monitoring paved the way for a new class of HMIs, which take such biosignals as inputs to c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Esposito, Daniele, Centracchio, Jessica, Andreozzi, Emilio, Gargiulo, Gaetano D., Naik, Ganesh R., Bifulco, Paolo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8540117/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34696076
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21206863
_version_ 1784588909918814208
author Esposito, Daniele
Centracchio, Jessica
Andreozzi, Emilio
Gargiulo, Gaetano D.
Naik, Ganesh R.
Bifulco, Paolo
author_facet Esposito, Daniele
Centracchio, Jessica
Andreozzi, Emilio
Gargiulo, Gaetano D.
Naik, Ganesh R.
Bifulco, Paolo
author_sort Esposito, Daniele
collection PubMed
description As a definition, Human–Machine Interface (HMI) enables a person to interact with a device. Starting from elementary equipment, the recent development of novel techniques and unobtrusive devices for biosignals monitoring paved the way for a new class of HMIs, which take such biosignals as inputs to control various applications. The current survey aims to review the large literature of the last two decades regarding biosignal-based HMIs for assistance and rehabilitation to outline state-of-the-art and identify emerging technologies and potential future research trends. PubMed and other databases were surveyed by using specific keywords. The found studies were further screened in three levels (title, abstract, full-text), and eventually, 144 journal papers and 37 conference papers were included. Four macrocategories were considered to classify the different biosignals used for HMI control: biopotential, muscle mechanical motion, body motion, and their combinations (hybrid systems). The HMIs were also classified according to their target application by considering six categories: prosthetic control, robotic control, virtual reality control, gesture recognition, communication, and smart environment control. An ever-growing number of publications has been observed over the last years. Most of the studies (about 67%) pertain to the assistive field, while 20% relate to rehabilitation and 13% to assistance and rehabilitation. A moderate increase can be observed in studies focusing on robotic control, prosthetic control, and gesture recognition in the last decade. In contrast, studies on the other targets experienced only a small increase. Biopotentials are no longer the leading control signals, and the use of muscle mechanical motion signals has experienced a considerable rise, especially in prosthetic control. Hybrid technologies are promising, as they could lead to higher performances. However, they also increase HMIs’ complexity, so their usefulness should be carefully evaluated for the specific application.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8540117
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85401172021-10-24 Biosignal-Based Human–Machine Interfaces for Assistance and Rehabilitation: A Survey Esposito, Daniele Centracchio, Jessica Andreozzi, Emilio Gargiulo, Gaetano D. Naik, Ganesh R. Bifulco, Paolo Sensors (Basel) Review As a definition, Human–Machine Interface (HMI) enables a person to interact with a device. Starting from elementary equipment, the recent development of novel techniques and unobtrusive devices for biosignals monitoring paved the way for a new class of HMIs, which take such biosignals as inputs to control various applications. The current survey aims to review the large literature of the last two decades regarding biosignal-based HMIs for assistance and rehabilitation to outline state-of-the-art and identify emerging technologies and potential future research trends. PubMed and other databases were surveyed by using specific keywords. The found studies were further screened in three levels (title, abstract, full-text), and eventually, 144 journal papers and 37 conference papers were included. Four macrocategories were considered to classify the different biosignals used for HMI control: biopotential, muscle mechanical motion, body motion, and their combinations (hybrid systems). The HMIs were also classified according to their target application by considering six categories: prosthetic control, robotic control, virtual reality control, gesture recognition, communication, and smart environment control. An ever-growing number of publications has been observed over the last years. Most of the studies (about 67%) pertain to the assistive field, while 20% relate to rehabilitation and 13% to assistance and rehabilitation. A moderate increase can be observed in studies focusing on robotic control, prosthetic control, and gesture recognition in the last decade. In contrast, studies on the other targets experienced only a small increase. Biopotentials are no longer the leading control signals, and the use of muscle mechanical motion signals has experienced a considerable rise, especially in prosthetic control. Hybrid technologies are promising, as they could lead to higher performances. However, they also increase HMIs’ complexity, so their usefulness should be carefully evaluated for the specific application. MDPI 2021-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8540117/ /pubmed/34696076 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21206863 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Esposito, Daniele
Centracchio, Jessica
Andreozzi, Emilio
Gargiulo, Gaetano D.
Naik, Ganesh R.
Bifulco, Paolo
Biosignal-Based Human–Machine Interfaces for Assistance and Rehabilitation: A Survey
title Biosignal-Based Human–Machine Interfaces for Assistance and Rehabilitation: A Survey
title_full Biosignal-Based Human–Machine Interfaces for Assistance and Rehabilitation: A Survey
title_fullStr Biosignal-Based Human–Machine Interfaces for Assistance and Rehabilitation: A Survey
title_full_unstemmed Biosignal-Based Human–Machine Interfaces for Assistance and Rehabilitation: A Survey
title_short Biosignal-Based Human–Machine Interfaces for Assistance and Rehabilitation: A Survey
title_sort biosignal-based human–machine interfaces for assistance and rehabilitation: a survey
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8540117/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34696076
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21206863
work_keys_str_mv AT espositodaniele biosignalbasedhumanmachineinterfacesforassistanceandrehabilitationasurvey
AT centracchiojessica biosignalbasedhumanmachineinterfacesforassistanceandrehabilitationasurvey
AT andreozziemilio biosignalbasedhumanmachineinterfacesforassistanceandrehabilitationasurvey
AT gargiulogaetanod biosignalbasedhumanmachineinterfacesforassistanceandrehabilitationasurvey
AT naikganeshr biosignalbasedhumanmachineinterfacesforassistanceandrehabilitationasurvey
AT bifulcopaolo biosignalbasedhumanmachineinterfacesforassistanceandrehabilitationasurvey