Cargando…

Co-Design Practices in Diet and Nutrition Research: An Integrative Review

Co-design, the method of involving users, stakeholders, and practitioners in the process of design, may assist to improve the translation of health evidence into tangible and acceptable intervention prototypes. The primary objective of this review was to identify and describe co-design techniques us...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tay, Brenda S. J., Cox, David N., Brinkworth, Grant D., Davis, Aaron, Edney, Sarah M., Gwilt, Ian, Ryan, Jillian C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8540362/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34684593
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu13103593
_version_ 1784588968869756928
author Tay, Brenda S. J.
Cox, David N.
Brinkworth, Grant D.
Davis, Aaron
Edney, Sarah M.
Gwilt, Ian
Ryan, Jillian C.
author_facet Tay, Brenda S. J.
Cox, David N.
Brinkworth, Grant D.
Davis, Aaron
Edney, Sarah M.
Gwilt, Ian
Ryan, Jillian C.
author_sort Tay, Brenda S. J.
collection PubMed
description Co-design, the method of involving users, stakeholders, and practitioners in the process of design, may assist to improve the translation of health evidence into tangible and acceptable intervention prototypes. The primary objective of this review was to identify and describe co-design techniques used in nutrition research. The secondary objective was to identify associations between co-design techniques and intervention effectiveness. An integrative review was performed using the databases Emcare, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Google Scholar. Eligible studies included those that: (1) utilised participatory research or co-design techniques, (2) described development and/or evaluation of interventions aimed at improving dietary behaviours or nutrition, and (3) targeted community-dwelling adults aged ≥18 years. We identified 2587 studies in the initial search and included 22 eligible studies. There were 15 studies that utilised co-design techniques, with a strong focus on engagement of multiple stakeholder types and use of participatory research techniques. No study implemented a complete co-design process. Most studies (14/15) reporting outcomes reported positive health (maximum p < 0.001) or health behaviour outcomes attributed to the intervention; hence, associations between co-design techniques and effectiveness could not be determined. Currently published intervention studies have used participatory research approaches rather than co-design methods. Future research is required to explore the effectiveness of co-design nutrition interventions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8540362
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85403622021-10-24 Co-Design Practices in Diet and Nutrition Research: An Integrative Review Tay, Brenda S. J. Cox, David N. Brinkworth, Grant D. Davis, Aaron Edney, Sarah M. Gwilt, Ian Ryan, Jillian C. Nutrients Review Co-design, the method of involving users, stakeholders, and practitioners in the process of design, may assist to improve the translation of health evidence into tangible and acceptable intervention prototypes. The primary objective of this review was to identify and describe co-design techniques used in nutrition research. The secondary objective was to identify associations between co-design techniques and intervention effectiveness. An integrative review was performed using the databases Emcare, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Google Scholar. Eligible studies included those that: (1) utilised participatory research or co-design techniques, (2) described development and/or evaluation of interventions aimed at improving dietary behaviours or nutrition, and (3) targeted community-dwelling adults aged ≥18 years. We identified 2587 studies in the initial search and included 22 eligible studies. There were 15 studies that utilised co-design techniques, with a strong focus on engagement of multiple stakeholder types and use of participatory research techniques. No study implemented a complete co-design process. Most studies (14/15) reporting outcomes reported positive health (maximum p < 0.001) or health behaviour outcomes attributed to the intervention; hence, associations between co-design techniques and effectiveness could not be determined. Currently published intervention studies have used participatory research approaches rather than co-design methods. Future research is required to explore the effectiveness of co-design nutrition interventions. MDPI 2021-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8540362/ /pubmed/34684593 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu13103593 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Tay, Brenda S. J.
Cox, David N.
Brinkworth, Grant D.
Davis, Aaron
Edney, Sarah M.
Gwilt, Ian
Ryan, Jillian C.
Co-Design Practices in Diet and Nutrition Research: An Integrative Review
title Co-Design Practices in Diet and Nutrition Research: An Integrative Review
title_full Co-Design Practices in Diet and Nutrition Research: An Integrative Review
title_fullStr Co-Design Practices in Diet and Nutrition Research: An Integrative Review
title_full_unstemmed Co-Design Practices in Diet and Nutrition Research: An Integrative Review
title_short Co-Design Practices in Diet and Nutrition Research: An Integrative Review
title_sort co-design practices in diet and nutrition research: an integrative review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8540362/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34684593
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu13103593
work_keys_str_mv AT taybrendasj codesignpracticesindietandnutritionresearchanintegrativereview
AT coxdavidn codesignpracticesindietandnutritionresearchanintegrativereview
AT brinkworthgrantd codesignpracticesindietandnutritionresearchanintegrativereview
AT davisaaron codesignpracticesindietandnutritionresearchanintegrativereview
AT edneysarahm codesignpracticesindietandnutritionresearchanintegrativereview
AT gwiltian codesignpracticesindietandnutritionresearchanintegrativereview
AT ryanjillianc codesignpracticesindietandnutritionresearchanintegrativereview