Cargando…
Co-Design Practices in Diet and Nutrition Research: An Integrative Review
Co-design, the method of involving users, stakeholders, and practitioners in the process of design, may assist to improve the translation of health evidence into tangible and acceptable intervention prototypes. The primary objective of this review was to identify and describe co-design techniques us...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8540362/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34684593 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu13103593 |
_version_ | 1784588968869756928 |
---|---|
author | Tay, Brenda S. J. Cox, David N. Brinkworth, Grant D. Davis, Aaron Edney, Sarah M. Gwilt, Ian Ryan, Jillian C. |
author_facet | Tay, Brenda S. J. Cox, David N. Brinkworth, Grant D. Davis, Aaron Edney, Sarah M. Gwilt, Ian Ryan, Jillian C. |
author_sort | Tay, Brenda S. J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Co-design, the method of involving users, stakeholders, and practitioners in the process of design, may assist to improve the translation of health evidence into tangible and acceptable intervention prototypes. The primary objective of this review was to identify and describe co-design techniques used in nutrition research. The secondary objective was to identify associations between co-design techniques and intervention effectiveness. An integrative review was performed using the databases Emcare, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Google Scholar. Eligible studies included those that: (1) utilised participatory research or co-design techniques, (2) described development and/or evaluation of interventions aimed at improving dietary behaviours or nutrition, and (3) targeted community-dwelling adults aged ≥18 years. We identified 2587 studies in the initial search and included 22 eligible studies. There were 15 studies that utilised co-design techniques, with a strong focus on engagement of multiple stakeholder types and use of participatory research techniques. No study implemented a complete co-design process. Most studies (14/15) reporting outcomes reported positive health (maximum p < 0.001) or health behaviour outcomes attributed to the intervention; hence, associations between co-design techniques and effectiveness could not be determined. Currently published intervention studies have used participatory research approaches rather than co-design methods. Future research is required to explore the effectiveness of co-design nutrition interventions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8540362 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85403622021-10-24 Co-Design Practices in Diet and Nutrition Research: An Integrative Review Tay, Brenda S. J. Cox, David N. Brinkworth, Grant D. Davis, Aaron Edney, Sarah M. Gwilt, Ian Ryan, Jillian C. Nutrients Review Co-design, the method of involving users, stakeholders, and practitioners in the process of design, may assist to improve the translation of health evidence into tangible and acceptable intervention prototypes. The primary objective of this review was to identify and describe co-design techniques used in nutrition research. The secondary objective was to identify associations between co-design techniques and intervention effectiveness. An integrative review was performed using the databases Emcare, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Google Scholar. Eligible studies included those that: (1) utilised participatory research or co-design techniques, (2) described development and/or evaluation of interventions aimed at improving dietary behaviours or nutrition, and (3) targeted community-dwelling adults aged ≥18 years. We identified 2587 studies in the initial search and included 22 eligible studies. There were 15 studies that utilised co-design techniques, with a strong focus on engagement of multiple stakeholder types and use of participatory research techniques. No study implemented a complete co-design process. Most studies (14/15) reporting outcomes reported positive health (maximum p < 0.001) or health behaviour outcomes attributed to the intervention; hence, associations between co-design techniques and effectiveness could not be determined. Currently published intervention studies have used participatory research approaches rather than co-design methods. Future research is required to explore the effectiveness of co-design nutrition interventions. MDPI 2021-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8540362/ /pubmed/34684593 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu13103593 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Tay, Brenda S. J. Cox, David N. Brinkworth, Grant D. Davis, Aaron Edney, Sarah M. Gwilt, Ian Ryan, Jillian C. Co-Design Practices in Diet and Nutrition Research: An Integrative Review |
title | Co-Design Practices in Diet and Nutrition Research: An Integrative Review |
title_full | Co-Design Practices in Diet and Nutrition Research: An Integrative Review |
title_fullStr | Co-Design Practices in Diet and Nutrition Research: An Integrative Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Co-Design Practices in Diet and Nutrition Research: An Integrative Review |
title_short | Co-Design Practices in Diet and Nutrition Research: An Integrative Review |
title_sort | co-design practices in diet and nutrition research: an integrative review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8540362/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34684593 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu13103593 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT taybrendasj codesignpracticesindietandnutritionresearchanintegrativereview AT coxdavidn codesignpracticesindietandnutritionresearchanintegrativereview AT brinkworthgrantd codesignpracticesindietandnutritionresearchanintegrativereview AT davisaaron codesignpracticesindietandnutritionresearchanintegrativereview AT edneysarahm codesignpracticesindietandnutritionresearchanintegrativereview AT gwiltian codesignpracticesindietandnutritionresearchanintegrativereview AT ryanjillianc codesignpracticesindietandnutritionresearchanintegrativereview |